The purpose of this study was to determine whether the loss of muscle strength in the elderly could be explained entirely by a decline in the physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) of muscle. Isometric force, muscle activation (twitch interpolation), and coactivation (surface electromyograph) were measured during maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) of the elbow flexors (EFs) and extensors (EEs) in 20 young (23 +/- 3 yr) and 13 older (81 +/- 6 yr) healthy men. PCSA was determined using magnetic resonance imaging, and normalized force (NF) was calculated as the MVC/PCSA ratio. The PCSA was smaller in the old compared with the young men, more so in the EEs (28%) compared with the EFs (19%) (P < 0.001); however, the decline in MVC (approximately 30%) with age was similar in the two muscle groups. Muscle activation was not different between the groups, but coactivation was greater (5%) (P < 0.001) in the old men for both muscles. NF was less (11%) in the EFs (P < 0.01) and tended to be unchanged in the EEs of the old compared with young subjects. The relative maintenance of NF in the EEs compared with the EFs may be related to age-associated changes in the architecture of the triceps brachii muscle. In conclusion, although the decline in PCSA explained the majority of strength loss in the old men, additional factors such as greater coactivation or reduced specific tension also may have contributed to the age-related loss of isometric strength.

The contributions of nervous system muscle activation and muscle atrophy to poststroke weakness have not been evaluated together in the same subject. Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) torque, voluntary activation (twitch interpolation), and electromyographic (EMG) amplitude were determined bilaterally in the plantar flexors of seven chronic stroke survivors (40-63 yr, 24-51 mo poststroke). Volumes of the plantar flexor muscles were determined bilaterally with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The mean (±SD) contralesional (paretic) MVC torque was less than one-half of the ipsilesional leg: 56.7 ± 57.4 vs. 147 ± 35.7 Nm (P = 0.006). Contralesional voluntary activation was only 48 ± 36.9%, but was near complete in the ipsilesional leg, 97 ± 1.9% (P = 0.01). The contralesional MVC EMG amplitude (normalized to the maximum M-wave peak-to-peak amplitude) of the gastrocnemii and soleus were 36.0 ± 28.5 and 36.0 ± 31.0% of the ipsilesional leg. Tibialis anterior (TA) EMG coactivation was not different between the contralesional (23.2 ± 24.0% of TA MVC EMG) and ipsilesional side (12.3 ± 5.7%) (P = 0.24). However, TA EMG coactivation was excessive (71%) in one subject and accounted for ~8% of her weakness based on the estimated antagonist torque. Relative (%ipsilesional leg) plantar flexor and gastrocnemii volumes were 88 ± 6% (P = 0.004) and 76 ± 15% (P = 0.01), respectively. Interlimb volume differences of the soleus, deep plantar flexors, and peronei were not significant. Preferred walking speed (0.83 ± 0.33 m/s) was related to the contralesional MVC torque (r(2) = 0.57, P = 0.05, N = 7), but the two subjects with the greatest weakness walked faster than three others. Our findings suggest that plantar flexor weakness in mobile chronic stroke survivors reflects mostly voluntary activation failure, with smaller contributions from antagonist activity and atrophy.

We have compared the number of muscle fibers in the biceps brachii muscle (BB) of six old men (82.3 +/- 4.3 years) and six young men (21.2 +/- 1.9 years). Muscle fiber number was estimated by dividing the maximal area of the BB, determined with magnetic resonance imaging, by the mean fiber area of the BB determined in a muscle biopsy. The percentage of type II fibers in the BB ( approximately 60%) and the type I fiber area were not different between the groups. The BB area (-26%), type II fiber area (-24%), mean fiber area (-20%), and maximal voluntary contraction strength (MVC) of the elbow flexor muscles (-27%) were lower in the old than young group. However, the estimated number of muscle fibers was not significantly different between the young (253000) and old (234000) men. Consequently, the smaller BB area of the old men could be explained primarily by a smaller type II fiber size. These findings suggest that old age is not associated with a reduced number of muscle fibers in the BB. The relative contribution of a reduction in fiber number to age-related muscle atrophy may be muscle-dependent.