No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Objectives: The first objective was to assess the diagnostic value of new biochemical criteria proposed to discriminate pleural transudates from exudates and to compare their efficiency with those of Light’s criteria. The second objective of the study was to assess the interstudy variability of the parameters repeatedly determinated in two different groups of patients with pleural effusion. Patients and Methods: We recorded clinical characteristics and final diagnoses and measured pleural fluid (PF) and serum levels of protein, LDH, cholesterol and cholinesterase of 243 patients with pleural effusion. Results: Sixty-one (25%) pleural effusions were transudates and 182 were exudates. The sensitivity (99%) and accuracy (96%) of Light’s criteria were higher than those of the other criteria tested, although the differences with those of the PF LDH-cholesterol combination (96 and 93%) did not show statistical significance. Pleural LDH concentration was the criterion with the highest specificity (95%), being significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of Light’s criteria. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of most criteria tested did not vary when compared with those obtained in a study performed 5 years previously. Conclusions: Light’s criteria remain the criteria of choice for segregating exudates from transudates. Based on cost-efficiency reasons, the PF LDH-cholesterol combination appears as an alternative. Because both sets of criteria misdiagnose a substantial percentage of transudates, exceptions based on good clinical judgment and the complementary use of a more specific criterion, as the PF concentration of LDH, must be considered.

Background The disposable bronchoscope is an excellent alternative to face the problem of SARS-CoV-2 and other cross infections, but the bronchoscopist's perception of its quality has not been evaluated. Methods To evaluate the quality of the Ambu-aScope4 disposable bronchoscope, we carried out a cross-sectional study in 21 Spanish pulmonology services. We use a standardized questionnaire completed by the bronchoscopists at the end of each bronchoscopy. The variables were described with absolute and relative frequencies, measures of central tendency and dispersion depending on their nature. The existence of learning curves was evaluated by CUSUM analysis. Results The most frequent indications in 300 included bronchoscopies was bronchial aspiration in 69.3% and the median duration of these was 9.1 min. The route of entry was nasal in 47.2% and oral in 34.1%. The average score for ease of use, image, and aspiration quality was 80/100. All the planned techniques were performed in 94.9% and the bronchoscopist was satisfied in 96.6% of the bronchoscopies. They highlighted the portability and immediacy of the aScope4TM to start the procedure in 99.3%, the possibility of taking and storing images in 99.3%. The CUSUM analysis showed average scores > 70/100 from the first procedure and from the 9th procedure more than 80% of the scores exceeded the 80/100 score. Conclusions The aScope4™ scored well for ease of use, imaging, and aspiration. We found a learning curve with excellent scores from the 9th procedure. Bronchoscopists highlighted its portability, immediacy of use and the possibility of taking and storing images.