Noninvasive markers would be useful for the assessment of portal hypertension (PH) and esophageal varices (EV) in patients with cirrhosis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the performance of the indocyanine green (ICG) retention test as a noninvasive marker of PH and EV, measured against the gold standards (hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] measurement and upper endoscopy). We prospectively enrolled patients with compensated cirrhosis referral to our unit. All patients underwent laboratory tests, abdominal ultrasound, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, HVPG measurement, and the ICG 15-minute retention (ICG-r15) test. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the ICG retention test and other noninvasive tools for the diagnosis of PH and EV. Ninety-six consecutive Child-Pugh A patients (67 male and 29 female; 60.3 6 11.8 years of age) were enrolled. Seventy-four patients had clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), of whom 59 had severe portal hypertension (SPH). ICG-r15 and Lok index were independently related to the presence of both CSPH and SPH, whereas ICG-r15 and INR were related to EV. ICG-r15 values (<6.7% and <6.9%, respectively) were able to rule out the presence of CSPH and SPH (LR 2 0.15 and 0.14); ICG-r15 <10% provided a 97.8% sensitivity (LR 2 0.042) for the exclusion of EV and a 100% sensitivity (LR 2 0.0) for large EV. Conclusion: The ICG-r15 test is an effective tool for assessment of PH in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Although this would not replace endoscopy, the ICG-r15 appears able to identify patients with advanced liver disease in which endoscopy is mandatory as well as rule out the presence of EV in patients with compensated cirrhosis. (HEPATOLOGY 2014;59:643-650) H istological and hemodynamic alterations occurring in the course of chronic liver disease (CLD) are characterized by progressive deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM), leading to liver tissue fibrogenesis and intra-and extrahepatic vascular changes. Capillarization of hepatic sinusoids as well as development of intrahepatic shunts and neoangiogenesis lead to increased intrahepatic resistance to blood flow.1,2 Both architectural and dynamic alterations (activation of myofibroblasts and hepatic stellate cells), together with increased portal blood flow resulting from splanchnic vasodilatation, lead to the development of portal hypertension (PH).The presence of PH is commonly observed in patients with liver cirrhosis. Development of PH significantly increases the risk of complications, such as

Pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis (PCI) is a rare condition that may be associated with a variety of diseases. The presenting clinical picture may be very heterogeneous and represent a challenge for the clinician. In the present paper we describe both a common and an uncommon clinical presentation of PCI and review the pertaining literature. Our cases confirm that, apart from asymptomatic cases, the clinical presentation of PCI may be widely different and suggest that a new onset of stipsis might be the presenting symptom. Diagnosis might be suggested by a simple X-ray of the digestive tract showing a change in the characteristics of the intestinal wall in two-thirds of these patients. However, one third of the patients do not have a suggestive X-ray and require a computed tomography (CT) scan/nuclear magnetic resonance that may reveal a thickened bowel wall containing gas to confirm the diagnosis and distinguish PCI from intraluminal air or submucosal fat. CT also allows the detection of additional findings that may suggest an underlying, potentially worrisome cause of PCI such as bowel wall thickening, altered contrast mucosal enhancement, dilated bowel, soft tissue stranding, ascites and the presence of portal air. Our results also point out that clinicians and endoscopists should be aware of the possible presentations of PCI in order to correctly manage the patients affected with this disease and avoid unnecessary surgeries. The increasing number of colonoscopies performed for colon cancer screening makes PCI more frequently casually encountered and/or provoked, therefore the possible endoscopic appearances of this disease should be well known by endoscopists.

ICG-r15 appears to be strictly related to liver decompensation, longitudinally confirming the preliminary findings of its correlation with PH among patients with compensated cirrhosis, and can be used for patient prognostication.

Background The differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lymph nodes (LNs) is crucial for patient management and clinical outcome. The use of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has been evaluated in several studies with diverse results. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the pooled diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS) and contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) in this setting. Methods A systematic electronic search was performed, including all original papers dealing with assessment of the nature of the LNs using CE-EUS or CH-EUS. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio. The Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve method was used to calculate the area under the curve. Statistical analysis was carried out using Meta-Disc V.1.4, Stata V.12.0 and Review Manager V.5.2. Results Among 210 pertinent studies, four (336 patients) were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity was 82.1 % (75.1 – 87.7 %) and pooled specificity was 90.7 % (85.9 – 94.3 %) with significant heterogeneity found in sensitivity; the positive-likelihood ratio (LR) was 7.77 (5.09 – 11.85) and the negative-LR was 0.15 (0.05 – 0.46); the pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 54 (15 – 190). Subgroup analysis including studies performed using CH-EUS (two studies, 177 LNs) showed a pooled sensitivity of 87.7 % (77.0 – 93.9 %) and a pooled specificity of 91.8 % (84.5 % – 96.4 %) with no significant heterogeneity; the pooled positive-LR was 9.51 (4.95 – 18.28) and the pooled negative-LR was 0.14 (0.06 – 0.35); pooled DOR was 68.42 (15.5 – 301.4). Conclusions From these data, CE-EUS is not recommended due to inadequate sensitivity. On the other hand, CH-EUS studies showed optimal accuracy (pooled sensitivity 87.7 % and specificity 91.8 %), comparable to elastography and even EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), suggesting a role in the diagnostic algorithm.