All three immunosuppressive regimens provided excellent safety and efficacy. However, the best results overall were achieved with TAC+MMF. The combination may provide particular benefit to kidney allograft recipients with DGF. In patients who experienced DGF, graft survival was better at 3 years in those patients receiving TAC in combination with either MMF or AZA as compared with the patients receiving CsA with MMF.
All three immunosuppressive regi-mens provided excellent safety and efficacy. How-ever, the best results overall were achieved with tacrolimus+MMF. The combination may provide particular benefit to kidney allograft recipients who develop delayed graft function/acute tubular necrosis. Renal function at 2 years was better in the tacrolimus treatment groups compared with the CsA group.
The aim of this study was to characterize the circadian variation of oral tacrolimus disposition in 8 stable liver allograft recipients. In the steady state, a total of 23 blood samples was taken before and after tacrolimus administration during a 24-hr period and the pharmacokinetic parameters were compared. The area under the curve (AUC) of tacrolimus after the morning dose was significantly larger than after the evening dose (211+/-43 ng x hr/ml [morning] vs. 179+/-45 ng x hr/ml [evening], P=0.02). The time to peak (Tmax) was significantly shorter after the morning dose than after the evening dose (1.6+/-0.7 hr [morning] vs. 2.9+/-0.6 hr [evening], P=0.002). The peak (Cmax) was significantly higher after the morning dose than after the evening dose (32.2+/-10.2 ng/ml [morning] vs. 19.1+/-4.3 ng/ml [evening], P=0.003). However, the trough (Cmin) was not significantly different between the morning dose and the evening dose (13.1+/-3.9 ng/ml [morning] vs. 13.3+/-4.4 ng/ml [evening], P=0.4). This study demonstrated that tacrolimus disposition in liver transplant patients was determined by administration time.
All regimens yielded similar acute rejection rates and graft survival, but the tacrolimus + MMF regimen was associated with the lowest rate of steroid resistant rejection requiring antilymphocyte therapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.