Background: A carotid web (CaW) is a shelf-like lesion in the posterior aspect of the internal carotid bulb and represents an intimal variant of fibromuscular dysplasia. CaW has been associated with recurrent strokes and conventionally treated with surgical excision. We report a multicenter experience of stenting in patients with symptomatic CaWs. Methods: Retrospective review of consecutive patients admitted to 5 comprehensive stroke centers who were identified to have a symptomatic CaW and treated with carotid stenting. A symptomatic CaW was defined by the presence of a shelf-like/linear, smooth filling defect in the posterior aspect of the carotid bulb diagnosed by neck CT angiography (CTA) and confirmed with conventional angiography in patients with negative stroke workup. Results: Twenty-four patients with stented symptomatic CaW were identified (stroke in 83% and transient ischemic attack in 17%). Their median age was 47 years (IQR 41–61), 14 (58%) were female, and were 17 (71%) black. The degree of stenosis by NASCET was 0% (range 0–11). All patients were placed on dual antiplatelets and stented at a median of 9 days (IQR 4–35) after the last event. Closed-cell stents were used in 18 (75%) of the cases. No periprocedural events occurred with the exception of 2 cases of asymptomatic hypotension/bradycardia. Clinical follow-up after stent placement occurred for a median of 12 months (IQR 3–19) with no new cerebrovascular events noted. Functional independence at 90 days was achieved in 22 (91%) patients. Follow-up vascular imaging (ultrasound n = 18/CTA n = 5) was performed at a median of 10 months (IQR 3–18) and revealed no stenosis. Conclusions: Stenting for symptomatic CaW appears to be a safe and effective alternative to surgical resection. Further studies are warranted.

Background Bypassing the emergency department and the computed tomography suite by directly transporting to the neuroangiography suite for imaging assessment and treatment may shorten reperfusion times while maintaining proper patient selection. Objective To determine whether flat-panel detector multiphase computed tomography angiography protocol is associated with reduced treatment times and a similar safety profile as the standard imaging protocol. Methods Single-center prospective study of consecutive patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion strokes transferred to our facility for consideration of endovascular therapy from May 2016 to December 2017. Those with basilar strokes and/or presenting to the emergency department were excluded. Patients were categorized into two groups: (1) flat-panel detector CT assessment in stroke to reduce times to intra-arterial treatment group, with patients transferred directly to the suite for multiphase computed tomography angiography; and (2) patients undergoing standard protocol including computed tomography ± computed tomography angiography/CT perfusion. The groups were matched for age, baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, and pretreatment glucose. Baseline characteristics, time metrics, and outcomes were compared. Results Out of 419 patients who underwent endovascular therapy over the study period, 210 patients fit inclusion criteria, with 54 (25.7%) in the flat-panel detector CT assessment in stroke to reduce times to intra-arterial treatment group. After matching, 49 flat-panel detector CT assessment in stroke to reduce times to intra-arterial treatment/control pairs were generated and analyzed. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Flat-panel detector CT assessment in stroke to reduce times to intra-arterial treatment patients had significantly shorter median door-to-puncture (33 [26.5-47] vs. 55 [44.5–66] min, p < 0.001), door-to-reperfusion (85 [57.5–115.5] vs. 110 [80–153], p = 0.005) and picture-to-puncture (18 [13.5–22.5] vs. 42 [32–47.5] min, p < 0.001) times. There were no differences in rates of successful reperfusion (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b-3, 95.9% vs. 100%, p = 0.5), parenchymal hematomas type-2 (4.1% vs. 2%, p = 1.00), good outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale 0–2, 44.9% vs. 40.8%, p = 0.68), and 90-day mortality (14.3% vs. 22.4%, p = 0.30). Conclusion Directly transferring patients to angiography and using multiphase computed tomography angiography to determine the eligibility for endovascular therapy is safe and may result in a significant reduction in treatment times. Future larger studies are warranted.

Purpose: Carotid web (CaW) is an underrecognized cause of cryptogenic stroke in young patients. The optimal imaging for CaW is unknown. We aim to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of diverse imaging modalities for the diagnosis of CaW.Methods: Retrospective analysis of institutional neurovascular database was performed to identify patients with multimodal (CT angiogram–CTA, digital subtraction angiogram–DSA, and/or ultrasound–US) imaging diagnosis of CaW or atherosclerosis. Baseline clinical demographics were recorded. Blinded image analysis was performed for each imaging modality by separate readers. Discrepancies were settled by consensus. Two-sided Cohen's Kappa (κ) coefficient was used to evaluate the inter-rater agreement for the etiological diagnosis between imaging modalities.Results: Thirty patients/60 carotids were evaluated by CTA and 55 carotids were included. Patients with symptomatic CaW (n = 20), compared to individuals with atherosclerosis (n = 10), were younger (49 ± 9 vs. 60 ± 8 years; p < 0.01), more commonly female (75% vs. 30%; p = 0.01), and less frequently presented vascular risk factors: Hypertension (40% vs. 100%; p < 0.01), hyperlipidemia (0% vs. 50%; p < 0.01), diabetes (10% vs. 40%; p = 0.05), and smoking (5% vs. 70%; p < 0.01). High inter-rater correlation strength existed for CTA (n = 55; κ = 0.88; p < 0.0001) and DSA (n = 28; κ = 0.86, p < 0.0001) readers for lesion diagnosis while US inter-rater agreement was lower (κ = 0.553; p = 0.001). Across modalities CTA and DSA shared very high strength of agreement (κ = 0.92; p < 0.0001), compared to a less pronounced agreement between US and CTA (κ = 0.553; p = 0.001). The strength of correlation between DSA-CTA was significantly more robust as compared to US-CTA (Z = 3.58; p = 0.0003).Conclusion: CTA and DSA demonstrated comparable and superior performance as compared to US in the diagnosis of CaW.