Male BC is usually ER, PR and AR-positive, Luminal B-like/HER2-negative. Of note, 56% patients had T1 tumors but only 4% had BCS. ER was highly positive in >90% of cases but only 77% received adjuvant ET. ER, PR and AR were associated with OS and RFS, whereas grade, Ki67 and IHC surrogates were not. Significant improvement in survival over time was observed.

Applying minimum requirements and quality indicators is essential to improve organisation, performance and outcome in breast care. Efficacy and compliance have to be constantly monitored to evaluate the quality of patient care and to allow appropriate corrective actions leading to improvements in patient care.

The overall incidence of osteosarcoma is low. However, the occurrence of osteosarcoma in a setting of multiple primary tumours is not infrequent, although population-based incidence numbers are unknown. The occurrence of osteosarcoma and other malignancies is frequently related to treatment, and can also be the result of genetic predisposition as in patients with retinoblastoma, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, Werner syndrome and Rothmund-Thomson syndrome. The aim of our study is to establish the incidence of osteosarcoma associated with other malignancies in a populationwide study and to find out if these osteosarcomas have a specific subtype, that could draw attention to a genetic predisposition to malignancy. A list of all patients registered in the Dutch National Pathology Register, named PALGA, with a diagnosis of osteosarcoma between 1975 and May 2000 was retrieved. All patients with another malignancy besides osteosarcoma were selected. All patients registered in the same period with a tonsillectomy served as a control for the occurrence of malignancy in a normal population. In a second step, only osteosarcoma patients with a history of retinoblastoma or a malignancy before the age of 46 years, since these are most probable to have a hereditary cancer syndrome, were retained for further analysis. The osteosarcomas were subtyped as common, chondroblastic, fibroblastic, teleangiectatic, anaplastic, osteoclast-rich or small cell. As a control for osteosarcoma subtypes the data of 570 patients entered in two studies from the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup (EORTC/MRC) were used. Of all 938 patients registered with the diagnosis of osteosarcoma, 66 had a history of multiple primary tumours. Four patients had a surface osteosarcoma, three an extraskeletal osteosarcoma and 59 had intramedullar highgrade osteosarcoma. Of this last group, one patient was known with Rothmund -Thomson syndrome, one had retinoblastoma and 30 had their malignancies before the age of 46. Of these 32 patients, 17 had osteosarcoma of the long bones. Especially women seem to be more susceptible for the development of multiple primaries. In nine patients, the histological subtype could be assessed by revision of available histological slides. All of these patients had an osteosarcoma subtype other than common as opposed to 29% in the control group of the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup. It is concluded that although the www.nature.com/ejhg incidence of osteosarcoma is low, the occurrence of another malignancy in osteosarcoma patients is higher than in the normal population. Specifically, osteosarcoma patients have a relative risk of 2.4 (95% confidence interval 1.88 -3.07) to develop another malignancy. A noncommon subtype of osteosarcoma should draw attention to a possible genetic predisposition of the patient involved.

Previous studies on the counsellees' perception of DNA test results did not clarify whether counsellees were asked about their recollections or interpretations, and focused only on patients' own risks and not on the likelihood that cancer is heritable in the family. We tested differences and correlations of four perception aspects: recollections and interpretations of both cancer risks and heredity likelihood. In a retrospective study, women tested for BRCA1/2 on average, 5 years ago, completed questionnaires about their perception. Participants had received an unclassified variant (n = 76), uninformative (n = 76) or pathogenic mutation (n = 51) result in BRCA1/2. Analyses included t-tests, correlations and structural equation modelling. The counsellees' perception showed to consist of four distinctive phenomena: recollections and interpretations of cancer risks and of heredity likelihood. This distinctiveness was suggested by significant differences between these perception variables. Moderate to strong correlations were found between these variables, suggesting that these differences between variables were consistent. The relationships between these variables were not influenced by actually communicated DNA test results, sociodemographics, medical and pedigree information, or framing of cancer risk questions. The largest differences between recollections and interpretations were found in the unclassified variant group and the smallest in uninformatives. Cancer risks and heredity likelihood correlated least in the pathogenic mutation group. Communication of ambiguous genetic information enlarged the differences. To understand the counsellees' perception of genetic counselling, researchers should study recollections and interpretations of cancer risks and heredity likelihood. Genetic counsellors should explicitly address the counsellees' recollections and interpretations, and be aware of possible inaccuracies.

No abstract