Cardiac hypertrophy is a well known response to increased hemodynamic load. Mechanical stress is considered to be the trigger inducing a growth response in the overloaded myocardium. Furthermore, mechanical stress induces the release of growth-promoting factors, such as angiotensin II, endothelin-1, and transforming growth factor-beta, which provide a second line of growth induction. In this review, we will focus on the primary effects of mechanical stress: how mechanical stress may be sensed, and which signal transduction pathways may couple mechanical stress to modulation of gene expression, and to increased protein synthesis. Mechanical stress may be coupled to intracellular signals that are responsible for the hypertrophic response via integrins and the cytoskeleton or via sarcolemmal proteins, such as phospholipases, ion channels and ion exchangers. The signal transduction pathways that may be involved belong to two groups: (1) the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) pathway; and (2) the janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway. The MAPK pathway can be subdivided into the extracellular-regulated kinase (ERK), the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and the 38-kDa MAPK (p38 MAPK) pathway. Alternatively, the stress signal may be directly submitted to the nucleus via the cytoskeleton without the involvement of signal transduction pathways. Finally, by promoting an increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration stretch may stimulate the calcium/calmodulin-dependent phosphatase calcineurin, a novel hypertrophic signalling pathway.
Objective: To study the effects of the active metabolite of vitamin D 3 , 1,25(OH) 2 D 3 , an immunomodulatory hormone, on the generation of so-called immature dendritic cells (iDCs) generated from monocytes (Mo-iDCs). Design and methods: Human peripheral blood monocytes were cultured to iDCs in the presence of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin (IL)-4 for 1 week, with or without the extra addition of 10 28 M 1,25(OH) 2 D 3 to the culture. Their phenotypes (CD14, CD1a, CD83, HLA-DR, CD80, CD86 and CD40 expression) were examined by¯uorescence-activated cell sorting, and their T-cell stimulatory potential was investigated in allogeneic mixed lymphocyte reaction (allo-MLR). Additionally, their in vitro production of IL-10, IL-12 and transforming growth factor b (TGF-b) were examined by using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: When 1,25(OH) 2 D 3 was added to monocytes in culture with GM-CSF and IL-4, it hampered the maturation of Mo-iDCs. First, the phenotype of the 1,25(OH) 2 D 3 -differentiated DCs was affected, there being impaired downregulation of the monocytic marker CD14 and impaired upregulation of the markers CD1a, CD83, HLA-DR, CD80 and CD40. CD86 was expressed on more 1,25(OH) 2 D 3 -differentiated DCs. Secondly, the T-cell stimulatory capability of 1,25(OH) 2 D 3 -differentiated DCs was upregulated relative to the original monocytes to a lesser degree than DCs differentiated without 1,25(OH) 2 D 3 when tested in an allo-MLR. With regard to the production of cytokines, Staphylococcus aureus cowan 1 strain (SAC)-induced IL-10 production, although not enhanced, remained high in 1,25(OH) 2 D 3 -differentiated DCs, but was strongly downregulated in DCs generated in the absence of 1,25(OH) 2 D 3 . SAC/interferon-g-induced IL-12 production was clearly upregulated in both types of DC relative to those of the original monocytes, and TGF-b production was downregulated. Conclusion: Our data con®rm earlier reports showing that 1,25(OH) 2 D 3 hampers the maturation of fully active immunostimulatory major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II+, CD1a+, CD80+ DCs from monocytes. Our data supplement the data from other reports by showing that the expression of CD86 was upregulated in 1,25(OH) 2 D 3 -differentiated DCs, whilst the capacity for IL-10 production remained high. Collectively, these data are in line with earlier descriptions of suppressive activities of this steroid-like hormone with respect to the stimulation of cell-mediated immunity.
Blood monocytes have an altered proinflammatory status in BD. Lithium treatment restores this altered status. Short-term in vitro exposure of monocytes to lithium has other effects than lithium treatment.
OBJECTIVE— There is evidence that monocytes of patients with type 1 diabetes show proinflammatory activation and disturbed migration/adhesion, but the evidence is inconsistent. Our hypothesis is that monocytes are distinctly activated/disturbed in different subforms of autoimmune diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS— We studied patterns of inflammatory gene expression in monocytes of patients with type 1 diabetes (juvenile onset, n = 30; adult onset, n = 30) and latent autoimmune diabetes of the adult (LADA) ( n = 30) (controls subjects, n = 49; type 2 diabetic patients, n = 30) using quantitative PCR. We tested 25 selected genes: 12 genes detected in a prestudy via whole-genome analyses plus an additional 13 genes identified as part of a monocyte inflammatory signature previously reported. RESULTS— We identified two distinct monocyte gene expression clusters in autoimmune diabetes. One cluster (comprising 12 proinflammatory cytokine/compound genes with a putative key gene PDE4B ) was detected in 60% of LADA and 28% of adult-onset type 1 diabetic patients but in only 10% of juvenile-onset type 1 diabetic patients. A second cluster (comprising 10 chemotaxis, adhesion, motility, and metabolism genes) was detected in 43% of juvenile-onset type 1 diabetic and 33% of LADA patients but in only 9% of adult-onset type 1 diabetic patients. CONCLUSIONS— Subgroups of type 1 diabetic patients show an abnormal monocyte gene expression with two profiles, supporting a concept of heterogeneity in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diabetes only partly overlapping with the presently known diagnostic categories.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.