Objective To assess the impact of resilience, the ability to withstand and bounce back from adversity, on measures of well-being, self-reported stress, and mental health diagnoses. Methods This study was a cross-sectional survey of participants seen at an executive health practice at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, from January 2012 through September 2016. Participants completed an anonymous survey that included demographic information and 3 validated survey instruments—the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), the 12-item Linear Analogue Self-Assessment Scale (LASA), and the 14-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Self-reported history of mental health diagnoses was also collected. CD-RISC scores were used to stratify participants into lower (<30), medium (30–34), or higher (≥35) resilience categories. Participants’ LASA scores, PSS scores, and self-reported mental health diagnoses were compared among resilience categories. Results Of the 2,027 eligible participants, 1,954 met the study inclusion criteria as currently employed corporate-sponsored executive or business professionals (self-designated) who completed the CD-RISC survey. Most participants (62.5%) were aged 40 to 59 years. The majority were male (78.3%), white (95.3%), educated (86.2%), and in a committed relationship (89.7%). Among participants, 41.7% reported higher resilience, 34.3% had medium resilience, and 24.0% had lower resilience. The quality of life and overall LASA scores were positively associated with higher resilience ( P < .001). PSS scores and self-reported mental health diagnoses were negatively associated with higher resilience ( P < .001). These associations remained significant after adjusting for patient characteristics. Conclusions In this cross-sectional survey of a large cohort of corporative executives, the lower-resilience cohort had a 4-fold higher prevalence of depression and an almost 3-fold higher prevalence of anxiety compared with the higher-resilience cohort. High resilience was positively associated with well-being and negatively associated with perceived stress. Our findings suggest that higher resilience in the executive workplace environment is associated with better mental health, reduced stress, and greater well-being.
Objectives To determine whether autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is associated with adverse fetal outcomes and maternal complications Methods We identified a cohort of 146 patients seen for pregnancy and cystic kidney disease at Mayo Clinic from 1975 to 2010. From this cohort, 54 patients met the ultrasound diagnostic criteria for ADPKD (ADPKD group), while the other 92 patients were diagnosed as “Simple Cyst” (control group). We compared the fetal and maternal outcomes of pregnancy and long-term maternal prognoses between these two groups. Results Overall, the fetal complication rates were similar between the ADPKD and control groups. Rates of spontaneous abortion (15.1% vs. 14%, P=.77) and premature birth (11.1% vs. 6.8%, P=.44) were comparable between groups, while the rate of fetal distress (3.4% vs. 0.7%, P<.01) was increased in the ADPKD group. The rate of preeclampsia in the patients with simple cysts (2%) was similar to that of the general population. In contrast, the pregnant ADPKD patients had higher risks for hypertension, proteinuria, edema, urinary tract infection, renal dysfunction, and preeclampsia during their pregnancies. Conclusion ADPKD is associated with increased maternal complications during pregnancy, but only has a slight potential of increased rates of fetal complications.
Objective To elucidate whether cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is protective or contributory to coronary artery disease plaque burden. Patients and Methods Study participants were working middle-aged men from the Mayo Clinic Executive Health Program who underwent coronary artery calcium (CAC) assessment and exercise treadmill testing for risk stratification. Data from January 1, 1995, through December 31, 2008, were considered. The CAC assessment score was used for lifelong plaque burden analysis; functional aerobic capacity (FAC) from treadmill testing was analyzed as 4 ranked categories of CRF. Known risk factors for cardiovascular disease, including family history, were also considered. Results In 2946 male patients in this retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study, known cardiovascular risk factor profiles and risk calculations tended to uniformly improve with increasing CRF, defined by the FAC level. Only the above-average group, or the third of 4 levels, was found consistently lower than other levels of FAC for CAC scores. The above-average group also had statistical significance after controlling for age, body mass index, and family history of coronary artery disease in a U-shaped distribution rather than the expected linear dose-response relationship. Plaque burden was significantly increased in patients with the highest FAC level ( P =.005) compared with the above-average group despite the observed maximal risk factor optimization in all known conventional cardiovascular risk factors. Conclusion For men, maximal CRF is associated with increased atherosclerosis, established with CAC scores. By comparison, average-to-moderate CRF appears to be cardioprotective regardless of either age or the influence of other contributing, recognized cardiac risk factors.
Clinical question:What is the best management approach for gynecomastia?Results:In most patients, surgical correction usually leads to immediate cosmetic and symptomatic improvement and is considered the best approach. In men who are being treated with antiandrogen therapies, pharmacological intervention with tamoxifen is the most effective approach, followed by radiotherapy.Implementation:Pitfalls to avoid when treating gynecomastia Failure to detect the very rare male breast cancerOverly aggressive early intervention or evaluationAppropriate medical interventionWhen to refer to specialist treatment
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.