Two cultivars of Vitis vinifera L., namely Grenache and Shiraz, have been described as having near‐isohydric and near‐anisohydric responses respectively to soil water stress (Schultz, Plant Cell and Environment, 26, 1393–1405, 2003). Given that contrast in sensitivity to soil water, a question arises as to whether atmospheric moisture stress will elicit similar differences. The present study was undertaken to investigate this issue by comparing stomatal responses in these same two cultivars to contrasting vapour pressure deficit (VPD). Test material included field grape vines in the Barossa Valley and pot‐grown vines under partial shade in Adelaide. Our experiments showed that the same isohydric/anisohydric distinction as described by Schultz (2003) is apparent in leaf responses to atmospheric moisture stress. In the more isohydric cultivar, Grenache, stomatal conductance is more responsive to changes in VPD. This heightened sensitivity (compared with Shiraz) appears to be associated with higher levels of abscisic acid (ABA) in Grenache xylem sap. Expression studies on the key genes in the ABA biosynthetic pathway indicate that regulation of the V.v.nced1 gene expression in leaf tissue, but not in the root tissues, is associated with the changes in the xylem sap ABA. Moreover, the two cultivars (Grenache and Shiraz) differed with respect to both scale and time course of those responses. We conclude that these two Vitis vinifera cultivars do indeed differ significantly in the way that they respond to potentially stressful atmospheric conditions, and that ABA physiology is a key process in these contrasting responses. An understanding of such mechanisms, including the relative importance of roots and shoots in determining vine response to abiotic stress, is highly relevant to irrigation scheduling, and to management of associated variation in vineyard productivity across diverse environments.
Gradients were observed in xylem sap ABA and in stomatal conductance along canes of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz. To investigate the source of the ABA responsible for these gradients a series of girdling and decapitation experiments were carried out. Leaf stomatal conductance and bulk ABA of leaves and apices were measured in control plants and in response to apex removal or girdling. Gradients in leaf ABA were observed over the first eight expanded leaves of field-grown Shiraz, with higher concentrations of ABA observed towards the apex. Gradients in stomatal conductance that correlated negatively with the concentration of ABA in the leaf ([ABA]leaf) were also observed over the first eight leaves. No significant effect of decapitation was observed on either leaf ABA or stomatal conductance except for the leaf immediately below the apex where a transient increase in [ABA]leaf was observed after 24 h with no corresponding decrease in conductance. Girdling resulted in an increase in [ABA]leaf in leaves distal to the girdle without the corresponding effect on conductance. These effects were further studied at the level of gene activity. To facilitate this, gene sequences encoding two key enzymes involved in the biosynthetic pathway of ABA in grape, zeaxanthin epoxidase (Zep) and 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (NCED), were isolated and characterised. The cDNA sequences were used as probes to measure the abundances of their respective mRNAs in the leaf and apical material. Levels of expression of one of the two genes encoding NCED, VvNCED1, reflected the gradients in [ABA]leaf in control vines, however treatment-induced changes in ABA were not always associated with corresponding changes in VvNCED1 expression. The abundances of both the VvNCED2 mRNA and Zep mRNA increased with increasing leaf age and did not appear to be associated with either the [ABA]leaf or the expression of VvNCED1. Our results indicate that observed gradients in g s are correlated with [ABA] gradients in mature leaves and xylem sap and that these [ABA] gradients are not derived directly from the apical tissues but, at least partially, from local synthesis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.