Objective Delirium occurs frequently in adults, and is an independent predictor of mortality. However, the epidemiology and outcomes of pediatric delirium are not well-characterized. The primary objectives of this study were to describe the incidence of delirium in critically ill children, its duration, associated risk factors, and effect on in-hospital outcomes, including mortality. Secondary objectives included determination of delirium subtype, and effect of delirium on duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), and length of hospital stay (LOS). Design Prospective longitudinal cohort study. Setting Urban academic tertiary care pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Patients All consecutive admissions from September 2014 through August 2015. Intervention Children were screened for delirium twice daily throughout their ICU stay. Measurements and Main Results Of 1547 consecutive patients, delirium was diagnosed in 267 (17%), and lasted a median of two days (IQR 1,5). Seventy-eight percent of children with delirium developed it within the first three PICU days. Most cases of delirium were of the hypoactive (46%) and mixed (45%) subtypes; only 8% of delirium episodes were characterized as hyperactive delirium. In multivariable analysis, independent predictors of delirium included age ≤2 years, developmental delay, severity of illness, prior coma, mechanical ventilation, and receipt of benzodiazepines and anticholinergics. PICU LOS was increased in children with delirium (adjusted relative LOS 2.3, CI= 2.1, 2.5, p<0.001), as was duration of MV (median 4 vs. 1 day, p<0.001). Delirium was a strong and independent predictor of mortality (adjusted OR 4.39, CI= 1.96–9.99, p<0.001). Conclusions Delirium occurs frequently in critically ill children and is independently associated with mortality. Some in-hospital risk factors for delirium development are modifiable. Interventional studies are needed to determine best practices to limit delirium exposure in at-risk children.

Objective To determine the costs associated with delirium in critically ill children. Design Prospective observational study. Setting An urban, academic, tertiary-care pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in New York City. Patients Four-hundred and sixty-four consecutive PICU admissions between 9/2/2014 and 12/19/2014. Interventions None. Measurements and Main Results All children were assessed for delirium daily throughout their PICU stay. Hospital costs were analyzed using cost-to-charge ratios, in 2014 dollars. Median total PICU costs were higher in patients with delirium than in patients who were never delirious ($18,832 vs. $4,803, p<0.0001). Costs increased incrementally with number of days spent delirious (median cost of $9,173 for 1 day with delirium, $19,682 for 2–3 days with delirium, and $75,833 for >3 days with delirium, p<0.0001); this remained highly significant even after adjusting for PICU length of stay (p<0.0001). After controlling for age, gender, severity of illness, and PICU length of stay, delirium was associated with an 85% increase in PICU costs (p<0.0001). Conclusions Pediatric delirium is associated with a major increase in PICU costs. Further research directed at prevention and treatment of pediatric delirium is essential to improve outcomes in this population, and could lead to substantial healthcare savings.

BackgroundThe Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) is a single tool that is intuitive, is easy to use, and includes both agitation and sedation. The RASS has never been formally validated for pediatric populations. The objective of this study was to assess inter-rater agreement and criterion validity of the RASS in critically ill children.MethodsTo evaluate validity, the RASS score was compared to both a visual analog scale (VAS) scored by the patient’s nurse, and the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS), performed by a researcher. The nurse completed the VAS by drawing a single line on a 10-cm scale anchored by “unresponsive” and “combative.” The UMSS was used to validate the sedation portion of the RASS only, as it does not include grades of agitation. For inter-rater agreement, one researcher and the patient’s nurse simultaneously but independently scored the RASS.ResultsOne hundred patient encounters were obtained from 50 unique patients, ages 2 months to 21 years. Of these, 27 assessments were on children who were mechanically ventilated and 73 were on children who were spontaneously breathing. In validity testing, the RASS was highly correlated with the nurse’s VAS (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.810, p < .0001) and with the UMSS (weighted kappa 0.902, p < .0001). Inter-rater agreement between nurse- and researcher-assessed RASS was excellent, with weighted kappa of 0.825 (p < .0001).ConclusionsThe RASS is a valid responsiveness tool for use in critically ill children. It allows for accurate assessment of awareness in mechanically ventilated and spontaneously breathing patients, and may improve our ability to titrate sedatives and assess for delirium in pediatrics.

Many areas of health IT application remain understudied and the majority of studies have non-significant or mixed findings. Our study suggests that larger, higher quality studies need to be conducted, particularly in the long-term care and ambulatory care settings.