Summary Like mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow (BM‐MSCs), adipose tissue‐derived adult stem cells (ADAS cells) can differentiate into several lineages and present therapeutical potential for repairing damaged tissues. The use of allogenic stem cells can enlarge their therapeutical interest, provided that the grafted cells could be tolerated. We investigate here, for the first time, the immunosuppressive properties of ADAS cells compared with the well‐characterized immunosuppressive properties of BM‐MSCs. ADAS cells did not provoke in vitro alloreactivity of incompatible lymphocytes and, moreover, suppressed mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) and lymphocyte proliferative response to mitogens. The impairment of inhibition when ADAS cells and BM‐MSCs were separated from lymphocytes by a permeable membrane suggests that cell contact is required for a full inhibitory effect. Hepatocyte growth factor is secreted by both stem cells but, similar to interleukin‐10 and transforming growth factor‐β (TGF‐β), the levels of which were undetectable in supernatants of MLR inhibited by ADAS cells or BM‐MSCs, it did not seem implicated in the stem cell suppressive effect. These findings support that ADAS cells share immunosuppressive properties with BM‐MSCs. Therefore, ADAS cell‐based reconstructive therapy could employ allogenic cells and because of their immunosuppressive properties, ADAS cells could be an alternative source to BM‐MSCs to treat allogenic conflicts.

Background In the high-prevalence setting of Pakistan, screening, diagnosis and treatment services for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients are commonly offered in specialized facilities. We aimed to describe the cascade of care in a Médecins Sans Frontières primary health care clinic offering CHC care in an informal settlement in Karachi, Pakistan. Methods This was a retrospective cohort analysis using routinely collected data. Three different screening algorithms were assessed among patients with one or more CHC risk factors. Results Among the 87 348 patients attending the outpatient clinic, 5003 (6%) presented with one or more risk factors. Rapid diagnostic test (RDT) positivity was 38% overall. Approximately 60% of the CHC patients across all risk categories were in the early stage of the disease, with an aspartate aminotransferase:platelet ratio index score <1. The sequential delays in the cascade differed between the three groups, with the interval between screening and treatment initiation being the shortest in the cohort tested with GeneXpert onsite. Conclusions Delays between screening and treatment can be reduced by putting in place more patient-centric testing algorithms. New strategies, to better identify and treat the hidden at-risk populations, should be developed and implemented.

We have used laser-assisted confocal microscopy to evaluate the intracellular distribution of daunorubicin (DNR) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell lines and fresh AML cells according to their differentiation phenotype. In KG1a, KG1, TF-1 and HEL cells, which express the early differentiation marker CD34, DNR was distributed in perinuclear vesicles which could be associated with the Golgi apparatus, as suggested by the distribution of fluorescent probes specific for intracellular organelles. In contrast, U937 and HL-60 cells, which display a more mature phenotype, exhibited nuclear and diffuse cytoplasmic DNR fluorescence. DNR sequestration was not correlated with P-glycoprotein (P-gp) or multidrug resistance protein expression. Furthermore, PSC833, a potent P-gp blocker, had little effect on drug sequestration in CD34 1 AML cells. We also tested the effect of metabolic inhibitors, cytoskeleton inhibitors and carboxy-ionophores on DNR distribution in both CD34 2 and CD34 1 AML cells. However, only non-specific metabolic inhibitors restored nucleic/cytoplasmic distribution in CD34 1 cells. In these cells, the intracellular distribution of doxorubicin and idarubicin was very similar to that of DNR, while the distribution of methoxymorpholinyl-doxorubicin was nuclear and diffusely cytoplasmic. In fresh AML cells, DNR was also concentrated in the perinuclear region in CD34 1 but not in CD34 2 cells. However, DNR sequestration was not observed in normal CD34 1 cells. Finally, our results show that DNR is sequestered in organelles in CD34 1 AML cells via an active mechanism which appears to be different from P-gp-mediated transport. Abnormal DNR distribution may account for the natural resistance of immature AML cells to anthracyclines.