Spreading depolarizations (SD) are waves of abrupt, near-complete breakdown of neuronal transmembrane ion gradients, are the largest possible pathophysiologic disruption of viable cerebral gray matter, and are a crucial mechanism of lesion development. Spreading depolarizations are increasingly recorded during multimodal neuromonitoring in neurocritical care as a causal biomarker providing a diagnostic summary measure of metabolic failure and excitotoxic injury. Focal ischemia causes spreading depolarization within minutes. Further spreading depolarizations arise for hours to days due to energy supply-demand mismatch in viable tissue. Spreading depolarizations exacerbate neuronal injury through prolonged ionic breakdown and spreading depolarization-related hypoperfusion (spreading ischemia). Local duration of the depolarization indicates local tissue energy status and risk of injury. Regional electrocorticographic monitoring affords even remote detection of injury because spreading depolarizations propagate widely from ischemic or metabolically stressed zones; characteristic patterns, including temporal clusters of spreading depolarizations and persistent depression of spontaneous cortical activity, can be recognized and quantified. Here, we describe the experimental basis for interpreting these patterns and illustrate their translation to human disease. We further provide consensus recommendations for electrocorticographic methods to record, classify, and score spreading depolarizations and associated spreading depressions. These methods offer distinct advantages over other neuromonitoring modalities and allow for future refinement through less invasive and more automated approaches.

Spreading depolarizations are waves of mass neuronal and glial depolarization that propagate across the injured human cortex. They can occur with depression of neuronal activity as spreading depressions or isoelectric spreading depolarizations on a background of absent or minimal electroencephalogram activity. Spreading depolarizations are characterized by the loss of neuronal ion homeostasis and are believed to damage functional neurons, leading to neuronal necrosis or neurological degeneration and poor outcome. Analgesics and sedatives influence activity-dependent neuronal ion homeostasis and therefore represent potential modulators of spreading depolarizations. In this exploratory retrospective international multicentre analysis, we investigated the influence of midazolam, propofol, fentanyl, sufentanil, ketamine and morphine on the occurrence of spreading depolarizations in 115 brain-injured patients. A surface electrode strip was placed on the cortex, and continuous electrocorticographical recordings were obtained. We used multivariable binary logistic regression to quantify associations between the investigated drugs and the hours of electrocorticographical recordings with and without spreading depolarizations or clusters of spreading depolarizations. We found that administration of ketamine was associated with a reduction of spreading depolarizations and spreading depolarization clusters (P < 0.05). Midazolam anaesthesia, in contrast, was associated with an increased number of spreading depolarization clusters (P < 0.05). By using a univariate odds ratio analysis, we also found a significant association between ketamine administration and reduced occurrence of isoelectric spreading depolarizations in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid haemorrhage and malignant hemispheric stroke (P < 0.05). Our findings suggest that ketamine-or another N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist-may represent a viable treatment for patients at risk for spreading depolarizations. This hypothesis will be tested in a prospective study.

Focal brain damage after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage predominantly results from intracerebral haemorrhage, and early and delayed cerebral ischaemia. The prospective, observational, multicentre, cohort, diagnostic phase III trial, DISCHARGE-1, primarily investigated whether the peak total spreading depolarization-induced depression duration of a recording day during delayed neuromonitoring (delayed depression duration) indicates delayed ipsilateral infarction. Consecutive patients (n = 205) who required neurosurgery were enrolled in six university hospitals from September 2009 to April 2018. Subdural electrodes for electrocorticography were implanted. Participants were excluded on the basis of exclusion criteria, technical problems in data quality, missing neuroimages or patient withdrawal (n = 25). Evaluators were blinded to other measures. Longitudinal MRI, and CT studies if clinically indicated, revealed that 162/180 patients developed focal brain damage during the first 2 weeks. During 4.5 years of cumulative recording, 6777 spreading depolarizations occurred in 161/180 patients and 238 electrographic seizures in 14/180. Ten patients died early; 90/170 developed delayed infarction ipsilateral to the electrodes. Primary objective was to investigate whether a 60-min delayed depression duration cut-off in a 24-h window predicts delayed infarction with &gt;0.60 sensitivity and &gt;0.80 specificity, and to estimate a new cut-off. The 60-min cut-off was too short. Sensitivity was sufficient [= 0.76 (95% confidence interval: 0.65–0.84), P = 0.0014] but specificity was 0.59 (0.47–0.70), i.e. &lt;0.80 (P &lt; 0.0001). Nevertheless, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of delayed depression duration was 0.76 (0.69–0.83, P &lt; 0.0001) for delayed infarction and 0.88 (0.81–0.94, P &lt; 0.0001) for delayed ischaemia (reversible delayed neurological deficit or infarction). In secondary analysis, a new 180-min cut-off indicated delayed infarction with a targeted 0.62 sensitivity and 0.83 specificity. In awake patients, the AUROC curve of delayed depression duration was 0.84 (0.70–0.97, P = 0.001) and the prespecified 60-min cut-off showed 0.71 sensitivity and 0.82 specificity for reversible neurological deficits. In multivariate analysis, delayed depression duration (β = 0.474, P &lt; 0.001), delayed median Glasgow Coma Score (β = −0.201, P = 0.005) and peak transcranial Doppler (β = 0.169, P = 0.016) explained 35% of variance in delayed infarction. Another key finding was that spreading depolarization-variables were included in every multiple regression model of early, delayed and total brain damage, patient outcome and death, strongly suggesting that they are an independent biomarker of progressive brain injury. While the 60-min cut-off of cumulative depression in a 24-h window indicated reversible delayed neurological deficit, only a 180-min cut-off indicated new infarction with &gt;0.60 sensitivity and &gt;0.80 specificity. Although spontaneous resolution of the neurological deficit is still possible, we recommend initiating rescue treatment at the 60-min rather than the 180-min cut-off if progression of injury to infarction is to be prevented.