BACKGROUND: Return-to-school processes indicate ‘when’ to initiate activities and ‘what’ activities should be accomplished, but are missing ‘how’ to implement the process. The SCHOOLFirst website provides the ‘how’ through building concussion knowledge, creating a supportive culture and defining roles. Due to the involvement of pre-service teachers in schools during training and imminent transition to becoming teachers, it is important that pre-service teachers are trained in concussion and can optimally support current and future students. OBJECTIVE: To determine: 1) pre-service teachers’ knowledge and confidence surrounding the return-to-school process before and after using the SCHOOLFirst website; 2) the usability, intended use and satisfaction of the SCHOOLFirst website from the perspective of pre-service teachers. METHODS: Thirty pre-service teachers completed the demographic survey, knowledge and confidence survey, System Usability Scale, and satisfaction and intended use survey after participating in a workshop. RESULTS: Significant increases in concussion knowledge (Z = –4.093, p < 0.001) and confidence in helping students return-to-school (Z = –4.620, p < 0.001) were measured after using the SCHOOLFirst website. Participants were satisfied with the SCHOOLFirst website (93.4%) and intend to use it in the future when supporting a student post-concussion (96.4%). CONCLUSION: The SCHOOLFirst website is a valuable tool for pre-service teachers to support students’ return-to-school post-concussion.
Background Clinical practice guidelines are systematically developed statements that assist clinicians in making evidence informed decisions regarding patient care. Within pediatric concussion, the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation released the Guidelines for Diagnosing and Managing Pediatric Concussion in 2014. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 2014 guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) evaluation tool, in addition to a brief knowledge translation survey, and to utilize the collected feedback from end users to inform improvements to support an updated version. An integrated knowledge translation approach was employed using clinical experts as guideline appraisers. Methods A purposive sample of researchers, physicians, allied health professionals, policy makers, educators and knowledge translation experts involved in updating the guidelines (N = 31) completed the AGREE II Likert scale survey regarding the 2014 guideline, and provided written justifications for their ratings. Domain and item AGREE II scaled scores were reported stratified by demographic factors, and written justifications were synthesized using content analysis to determine areas of improvement for the 2014 guideline. Results Appraisers scored the editorial independence (88.9%) and scope and purpose (80.8%) domains the highest, indicating high quality. The guidelines scored the lowest in the applicability domain (69.3%). Participants with less than 10 years of experience in their respective disciplines, as well as physicians and allied health professionals consistently provided higher ratings across domains compared to other professions. Conclusions The process of evaluating the 2014 guideline resulted in these important outcomes: (1) identified areas of the guideline that may have affected the lack of previous clinical uptake while abiding by a clinical practice guideline development framework; (2) shared and informed decision making regarding content and format of the revised clinical practice guideline; and (3) targeted content, clinical questions and dissemination strategies, which are key to clinical uptake.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.