Background: Most frequent attendance in primary care is temporary, but persistent frequent attendance is expensive and may be suitable for psychological intervention. To plan appropriate intervention and service delivery, there is a need for research involving standardised psychiatric interviews with assessment of physical health and health status.

Objective: To assess the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial of occupational therapy predischarge home visits for people after stroke. Design: Randomized controlled trial and cohort study. We randomized eligible patients for whom there was clinical uncertainty about the need to conduct a home visit to a randomized controlled trial; patients for whom a visit was judged 'essential' were enrolled into a cohort study. Setting: Stroke rehabilitation unit of teaching hospital. Participants: One hundred and twenty-six participants hospitalized following recent stroke. Interventions: Predischarge home visit or structured, hospital-based interview. Main outcome measures:The primary objective was to collect information on the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial, including eligibility, control intervention and outcome assessments. The primary outcome measure was the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale at one month after discharge from hospital. Secondary outcomes included mood, quality of life and costs at one week and one month following discharge. Results: Ninety-three people were allocated to the randomized controlled trial; 47 were randomized to intervention and 46 to control. Thirty-three were enrolled into the cohort study. More people were allocated to the randomized controlled trial as the study progressed. One hundred and thirteen people (90%) received the proposed intervention, although there was a need for stricter protocol adherence. Follow-up was good: at one month 114 (90%) were assessed. There were no significant differences Clinical Rehabilitation 27(5) between the groups in the randomized controlled trial for the primary outcome measure at one month. The average cost of a home visit was £208. Conclusion: A trial is feasible and warranted given the resource implications of predischarge occupational therapy home visits.

Occupational therapy interventions, such as home visits, have been identified as being resource-intensive, but cost-effectiveness analyses are rarely, if ever, carried out. We sought to estimate the cost-effectiveness of occupational therapy home visits after stroke, as part of a feasibility study, and to demonstrate the value and methods of economic evaluation. Method: We completed a cost-effectiveness analysis of pre-discharge occupational therapy home visits after stroke compared with a hospital-based interview, carried out alongside a feasibility randomized controlled trial. Our primary outcome was quality-adjusted life years. Full cost and outcome data were available for 65 trial participants. Findings: We found that the mean total cost of a home visit was £183, compared with £75 for a hospital interview. Home visits are shown to be slightly more effective, resulting in a cost per quality-adjusted life year of just over £20,000. Conclusion: Our analysis is the only economic evaluation of this intervention to date. Home visits are shown to be more expensive and more effective than a hospital-based interview, but our results are subject to a high level of uncertainty and should be treated as such. Further economic evaluations in this field are encouraged.

Background: Three-dimensional laser scanning has been used for patient measurement for cranial helmets and spinal braces. Ankle–foot orthoses are commonly prescribed for children with orthopaedic conditions. This trial sought to compare ankle–foot orthoses produced by laser scanning or traditional plaster casting. Objectives: Assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of using laser scanning to produce ankle–foot orthoses. Study design: Randomised controlled trial with blinding of orthotists and patients to the construction technique used. Methods: A randomised double-blind trial comparing fabrication of ankle–foot orthoses from casts or laser scans. Results: The time spent in the rectification and moulding of scanned ankle–foot orthoses was around 50% less than for cast ankle–foot orthoses. A non-significant increase of 9 days was seen in the time to delivery to the patient for laser scanning with computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing. There was a higher incidence of problems with the scan-based ankle–foot orthoses at delivery of the device, but no difference in how long the ankle–foot orthoses lasted. Costs associated with laser scanning were not significantly different from traditional methods of ankle–foot orthosis manufacture. Conclusion: Compared with conventional casting techniques, laser scan–based ankle–foot orthosis manufacture did not significantly improve either the quality of the final product or the time to delivery. Clinical relevance Ankle–foot orthoses (AFOs) are a common requirement for chronic neurological conditions during childhood. Improved efficiency of provision of AFOs would benefit children and families by reducing the delay in provision of devices and would benefit the health service by making best use of valuable orthotist time.