BackgroundObesity interventions rely predominantly on managing dietary intake and/or increasing physical activity but sustained adherence to behavioural regimens is often poor. Avatar technology is well established within the computer gaming industry and evidence suggests that virtual representations of self may impact real-world behaviour, acting as a catalyst for sustained weight loss behaviour modification. However, the effectiveness of avatar technology in promoting weight loss is unclear.AimsWe aimed to assess the quantity and quality of empirical support for the use of avatar technologies in adult weight loss interventions.MethodA systematic review of empirical studies was undertaken. The key objectives were to determine if: (i) the inclusion of avatar technology leads to greater weight loss achievement compared to routine intervention; and (ii) whether weight loss achievement is improved by avatar personalisation (avatar visually reflects self).ResultsWe identified 6 papers that reported weight loss data. Avatar-based interventions for weight loss management were found to be effective in the short (4–6 weeks) and medium (3–6 months) term and improved weight loss maintenance in the long term (12 months). Only 2 papers included avatar personalisation, but results suggested there may be some added motivational benefit.ConclusionsThe current evidence supports that avatars may positively impact weight loss achievement and improve motivation. However, with only 6 papers identified the evidence base is limited and therefore findings need to be interpreted with caution.

Continuously reducing excess blood glucose is a primary goal for the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Most patients with T2D require glucose-lowering medications to achieve and maintain adequate glycemic control; however, treatment failure may occur, limiting treatment options. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are an emerging therapeutic class that can be prescribed for patients instead of basal insulin after the failure of oral therapies. Recent studies have focused on the durability and tolerability of long-term GLP-1RA therapy. This review summarizes the key efficacy and safety findings from prospective phase 3 clinical studies of at least 76 weeks’ duration for the GLP-1RAs currently approved in the United States and the European Union (albiglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide twice daily [BID], exenatide once weekly [QW], liraglutide, and lixisenatide). Currently, most of the long-term data are from uncontrolled extension studies, and continuous patient benefit has been observed for up to 3 years with multiple GLP-1RAs. Four-year comparative data demonstrated a longer time to treatment failure for exenatide BID than for sulfonylurea, and 3-year comparative extension data demonstrated greater glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reductions and weight loss with exenatide QW than with insulin glargine. Currently, the longest extension study for a GLP-1RA is the DURATION-1 study of exenatide QW, with >7 years of clinical data available. Data from DURATION-1 demonstrated that continuous HbA1c reductions and weight loss were observed for the patients continuing on the treatment, with no unexpected adverse events. Taken together, these data support GLP-1RAs as a long-term noninsulin treatment option after the failure of oral therapies.

Background: Liraglutide may be less effective in patients with more advanced type 2 diabetes. This study from the Association of British Clinical Diabetologists Nationwide Liraglutide Audit analysed changes in HbA1c of patients after 26 weeks of treatment with liraglutide 1.2 mg, stratified according to the intensity of their background diabetes therapy, or according to their duration of diabetes. Methods: Patients using liraglutide as add-on therapy were stratified for receipt to one, two or three oral antidiabetic agents (OADs) or insulin (± OAD), or for diabetes duration of 0-5 years, 6-10 years, or >10 years. Changes

The ageing population is expected to increase the burden of osteoporosis on the health care system. Secondary causes of osteoporosis are found in a proportion of patients. There is much controversy regarding the best work-up for patients who have been diagnosed as having osteoporosis based on bone mineral density. It is difficult to decide where interventions should be targeted both from a patient's perspective and for cost effectiveness. We evaluated the utility of a standard panel (full blood count, plasma viscosity, plasma protein, electrophoresis, urine Bence Jones protein, thyroid function test, bone profile, fasting lipids and liver function test) of biochemical investigations in 327 consecutive patients (287 females, 40 males) referred to the new patient osteoporosis clinic from April 1999 to March 2000. Patients were characterised after measurement of spinal/femoral neck bone mineral density after a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan. There were 88 patients with osteoporosis, 91 with osteopenia, 130 had normal bone mineral density and 20 who did not have a bone scan. No case of multiple myeloma was found in this cohort of patients. There was no difference in the mean plasma viscosity of patients with and without osteoporosis (P=0.182). There was no significant difference in the abnormal urine calcium/creatinine (Ca/Cr ratio) in patients with osteoporosis and those without osteoporosis (P=0.316). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of hypothyroidism (P=0.213) or thyrotoxicosis (P=0.138) in patients with and without osteoporosis. There was no strong correlation between cholesterol concentrations and osteoporosis (r=0.069). We found no utility in performing a myeloma screen. A small proportion of patients had abnormalities of calcium homeostasis or thyroid disease. We recommend that a screening biochemical evaluation should be restricted to calcium/bone profile and thyroid function tests in patients with a presumptive diagnosis of osteoporosis.