Background/Aim: SLC20A1 has been identified as a prognostic marker in ER+ breast cancer. However, the role of SLC20A1 expression in breast cancer subtypes other than the ER+ types remains unclear. Materials and Methods: Genomics datasets were downloaded and analyzed, and the effect of SLC20A1 knockdown using targeted siRNA on cell viability and tumor-sphere formation was assessed. Results: SLC20A1 high patients with ER+, claudin-low or basal-like breast cancers showed poor prognoses. SLC20A1 high patients treated with radiotherapy had poor clinical outcomes. SLC20A1 knockdown suppressed the viability of MDA-MB 231 (claudin-low), MDA-MB 468 (basal-like) and MCF-7 (ER+) cells, and tumor-sphere formation by ALDH1 high cells. These results suggest that SLC20A1 is involved in cancer progression and contributes to clinical outcomes in patients with ER+, claudin-low and basal-like breast cancers. Conclusion: SLC20A1 is a potential prognostic marker and therapeutic target in ER+, claudin-low and basal-like breast cancers.Breast cancer is the most commonly occurring cancer among women worldwide, with 2.1 million new cases (24.2% of all cancers in women) and 0.6 million cancer-related deaths (15.0% of all cancer-related deaths among woman) annually (1). Breast cancer is classified using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and gene expression patterns (PAM50) (2-7). Based on IHC, breast cancer is classified into four types: ER+ and/or PgR+ HER2-type, ER+ and/or PgR+ HER2+ type, ER-and PgR-HER2+ type and triple negative type (TNBC). Based on PAM50, breast cancer is classified into at least six subtypes: normal-like, luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, claudin-low and basal-like (2-7). Among these, the luminal A and luminal B types express ER (8, 9), and some luminal B and HER2-enriched types express HER2 (4, 8-11). Many claudin-low and basal-like types overlap with the TNBC type (6,(12)(13)(14).Breast cancer treatment mainly entails surgery, radiotherapy and drug therapy, which may include chemotherapy, endocrine therapy and/or molecular target therapy. Overall, breast cancer prognosis is good. Endocrine therapy is selected against ER+ type and a HER2-targeted antibody, such as trastuzumab, is used to treat HER2 type (11,15,16). However, there is no effective drug or molecular targeted therapy for TNBC or its overlapping claudin-low and basal-like types. Consequently, those patients are treated only with surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and have poor prognoses (6,13,(15)(16)(17). Moreover, it is also known that in some of these cases, chemo-and/or radiotherapy actually stimulates cancer progression (18)(19)(20). It is therefore essential to identify effective prognostic markers and molecular targets that can be exploited for the treatment of the claudin-low and basallike breast cancer subtypes.A major hurdle that must be overcome for therapy to be effective against the claudin-low and basal-like subtypes is 43 This article is freely accessible online.
This study is an evaluation of the effect of gastrointestinal cancer chemotherapy with short‐term periodic steroid premedication on bone metabolism. Primary endpoints were changes in bone mineral densities and metabolic bone turnover 16 weeks after initiation of chemotherapy.
In the present study, we newly established a SCSC cell line with strong invasiveness. This is the first report on the establishment of SCSC cell line. The SCSC cell line can be a useful cell model for the study to know the cytodifferentiation and nature of SCSC.
ObjectiveFew data regarding the incidence of cancer-associated thromboembolism (TE) are available for Asian populations. We investigated the incidence of TE (TEi) and its risk factors among gastric and colorectal cancer (GCC) patients received chemotherapy in a daily practice setting.DesignA retrospective cohort study.SettingA single-institutional study that used data from Sapporo City General Hospital, Japan, on patients treated between January 2008 and May 2015.ParticipantsFive hundred Japanese GCC patients who started chemotherapy from January 2008 to May 2015.Primary and secondary outcome measuresTE was diagnosed by reviewing all the reports of contrast-enhanced CT performed during the follow-up period. All types of thrombosis detected by CT or additional imaging tests, such as venous TE, arterial TE and cerebral infarction, were defined as TE. Medical records of all identified patients were reviewed and potential risk factors for TE, including clinicopathological backgrounds, were collected. We defined the following patients as ‘active cancer’; patients with unresectable advanced GCC, cancer recurrence during or after completing adjuvant chemotherapy and/or presence of other malignant tumours.ResultsOf the 500 patients, 70 patients (14.0%) developed TE during the follow-up period. TEi was 9.2% and 17.3% in GCC patients, 18.1% and 3.5% in active and non-active cancer patients, and 24.0% and 12.9% in multiple and single primary, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that colorectal cancer (CRC) (OR 2.371; 95% CI 1.328 to 4.233), active cancer (OR 7.593; 95% CI 2.950 to 19.543) and multiple primary (OR 2.527; 95% CI 1.189 to 5.370) were independently associated with TEi.ConclusionTEi was 14.0% among Japanese GCC patients received chemotherapy, and was significantly higher among patients with CRC, active cancer and multiple primary than among those with gastric cancer, non-active cancer and single primary, respectively.Trial registration numberUMIN000018912.
Background/Aim: p62 (also known as sequestosome 1) is involved in cancer progression, and high expression of p62 indicates poor clinical outcome in several cancer types. However, the association between p62 gene expression and cancer stem cells (CSCs) in breast cancer subtypes remains unclear. Materials and Methods: In the present study, genomic datasets of primary breast cancer (The Cancer Genome Atlas, n=593; and Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium, n=2,509) were downloaded. p62 Expression was then examined in normal and breast cancer tissues derived from the same patients. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were employed to evaluate disease-specific survival. Next, the effect on cell viability and in vitro tumor-sphere formation of p62 knockdown using targeted small interfering RNA was assessed by using cells with high activity of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1 high ). Results: Patients with normal-like, luminal A or luminal B breast cancer with p62 high had poor prognosis. Furthermore, patients with p62 high ALDH1A3 high luminal B type also exhibited poor prognoses. Knockdown of p62 suppressed viability and tumor-sphere formation by ALDH1 high cells of the luminal B-type cell lines BT-474 and MDA-MB- These results suggest that p62 is essential for cancerous progression of ALDH1-positive luminal B breast CSCs, and contributes to poor prognosis of luminal B breast cancer. Conclusion: p62 is potentially a prognostic marker and therapeutic target for ALDH1-positive luminal B breast CSCs.Breast cancer has the highest prevalence among cancers of women worldwide, with 2.26 million new cases (24.5% of all cancer cases in women) and 685,000 cancer-associated mortalities (15.5% of all cancer-associated mortalities among women) annually (1). Breast cancer is classified using two parameters: Immunohistochemistry and gene-expression patterns [prediction analysis of microarray 50 (PAM50)] (2-8). Based on its PAM50, breast cancer is classified into at least six subtypes: Normal-like, luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-enriched, claudin-low and basal-like (5, 7, 8). Among these, the luminal B type expresses estrogen receptor, and certain luminal B tumors express HER2 and highly express proliferation-related genes such as marker of proliferation Ki-67 (MKI67). In addition, the luminal B type has poorer prognosis (7,(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). Breast cancer treatment mainly entails surgery, radiotherapy and drug therapy, including chemotherapy, endocrine therapy and molecular targeted therapy. However, there are still numerous 3299
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.