Hopelessness is a pre-eminent risk factor for suicide and non-fatal self-harm. Although the Beck Hopelessness Scale is often used for schizophrenia, its factor structure has been given relatively little consideration in this context. This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Taiwanese version of the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS-T) in a chronic schizophrenia out-patient sample. One hundred and two (102) outpatients were evaluated using the translated Taiwanese version of the BHS (BHS-T), as well as several Beck-related symptom rating scales and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for psycho-pathology. The patients were also evaluated for suicidal intent using the critical items of the Scale for Suicide Ideation (SSI) and suicide attempts. The psychometric properties of the BHS-T were also evaluated, including construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergence, and discriminative validity. The BHS-T showed good overall reliability and stability over time. This translated scale comprised a two-factor solution corresponding negative expectation and loss of motivation dimensions. Differences in mean hopelessness scores between participants with and without suicidal intent were significant. The results also indicated that, among individuals with schizophrenia, "negative expectation in the future" is more closely linked to suicide intent than "loss of motivation for the future". The BHS-T is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring the multi-dimensionality of hopelessness and may complement clinical suicidal risk assessments in individuals with schizophrenia.

BackgroundThe Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS) was designed for the assessment of the cognitive processes involved in self-reflection and the ability to modify erroneous beliefs and misinterpretations. Studies investigating the factor structure of the BCIS have indicated a two-factor model in the psychotic population. The factor structure of the BCIS, however, has not received much consideration in the nonpsychiatric population. The present study examined the factor structure and validity of the BCIS and compared its scores between nonpsychiatric individuals and outpatients with psychosis.MethodThe Taiwanese version of the BCIS was administered to 507 nonpsychiatric individuals and 118 outpatients with schizophrenia. The psychometric properties of the BCIS were examined through the following analyses: exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, reliability, correlation analyses, and discriminative validity.ResultsThe BCIS showed adequate internal consistency and stability over time. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses on the 15-item measure indicated a two-factor solution that supported the two dimensions of the Taiwanese BCIS, which was also observed with the original BCIS. Following the construct validation, we obtained a composite index (self-reflectiveness minus self-certainty) of the Taiwanese BCIS that reflected cognitive insight. Consistent with previous studies, our results indicated that psychosis is associated with low self-reflectiveness and high self-certainty, which possibly reflect lower cognitive insight. Our results also showed that better cognitive insight is related to worse depression in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, but not in nonpsychiatric individuals. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.731. A composite index of 3 was a good limit, with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 51%.ConclusionThe BCIS proved to be useful for measuring cognitive insight in Taiwanese nonpsychiatric and psychotic populations.

The PDI is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring the dimensionality of delusion proneness and appears to complement subclinical psychosis assessment scales for both epidemiological and clinical research in Taiwan.

The Cardiff anomalous perceptions scale (CAPS) has been recently designed for the assessment of anomalous perceptual experiences in the general population, and includes dimensions that measure distress, intrusiveness, and frequency. The purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of a Taiwanese version of the CAPS. The English version of the CAPS was translated into Taiwanese (CAPS-T) and the latter was applied to this study. We administered the questionnaire to a consecutive sample of 192 participants with (n = 106; clinical group including schizophrenia and affective psychosis) or without psychotic disorders (n = 86; non-clinical group). In addition to the CAPS-T, the Taiwanese version of the brief psychiatric symptom rating scale (BSRS) measured the severity of the psychopathology. We also tested the psychometric properties of the CAPS-T including construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent and discriminative validity. Overall, the CAPS-T showed good construct validity, internal consistency, and stability over time and correlated significantly with the psychoticism subscale of the BSRS. As predicted, the mean differences in CAPS-T scores between participants with or without a psychotic disorder were significant. Convergent and discriminative validity were satisfactory. A score of 5 was found to the best threshold in discriminating between clinical and non-clinical samples. Our findings indicate that the Taiwanese version of the CAPS is a reliable and valid instrument to measure the multidimensionality of perceptual anomalies in general and appears to complement the clinical measures of psychosis proneness in Taiwan.

No abstract