Continuous spikes and waves during sleep (CSWS) is an epileptic encephalopathy characterized in most patients by (1) difficult to control seizures, (2) interictal epileptiform activity that becomes prominent during sleep leading to an electroencephalogram (EEG) pattern of electrical status epilepticus in sleep (ESES), and (3) neurocognitive regression. In this paper, we will summarize current epidemiological, clinical, and EEG knowledge on CSWS and will provide suggestions for treatment. CSWS typically presents with seizures around 2–4 years of age. Neurocognitive regression occurs around 5-6 years of age, and it is accompanied by subacute worsening of EEG abnormalities and seizures. At approximately 6–9 years of age, there is a gradual resolution of seizures and EEG abnormalities, but the neurocognitive deficits persist in most patients. The cause of CSWS is unknown, but early developmental lesions play a major role in approximately half of the patients, and genetic associations have recently been described. High-dose benzodiazepines and corticosteroids have been successfully used to treat clinical and electroencephalographic features. Corticosteroids are often reserved for refractory disease because of adverse events. Valproate, ethosuximide, levetiracetam, sulthiame, and lamotrigine have been also used with some success. Epilepsy surgery may be considered in a few selected patients.

Objective.Compare the effectiveness of initial treatment for infantile spasms.Methods.The National Infantile Spasms Consortium prospectively followed children with new onset infantile spasms that began at age 2-24 months at 23 US centers (2012-2018). Freedom from treatment failure at 60 days required no second treatment for infantile spasms and no clinical spasms after 30 days of treatment initiation. We managed treatment selection bias with propensity score weighting and within-center correlation with generalized estimating equations.Results.Freedom from treatment failure rates were: ACTH 88/190 (46%), oral steroids 42/95 (44%), vigabatrin 32/87 (37%), and non-standard therapy 4/51 (8%). Changing from oral steroids to ACTH was not estimated to affect response (observed 44% estimated to change to 44% [95% CI 34–54]). Changing from non-standard therapy to ACTH would improve response from 8% to 39 [17–67]%, and to oral steroids from 8% to 38 [15–68]%. There were large but not statistically significant estimated effects of changing from vigabatrin to ACTH (29% to 42 [15–75]%), vigabatrin to oral steroids (29% to 42 [28–57]%), and non-standard therapy to vigabatrin (8% to 20 [6-50]%). Among children treated with vigabatrin, those with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) responded more often than others (62% vs 29%; p<0.05)Conclusion.Compared to non-standard therapy, ACTH and oral steroids are superior for initial treatment of infantile spasms. The estimated effectiveness of vigabatrin is between ACTH / oral steroids and non-standard therapy, though the sample was underpowered for statistical confidence. When used, vigabatrin worked best for TSC.Classification of Evidence:This study provides Class III evidence that for children with new onset infantile spasms, ACTH or oral steroids were superior to non-standard therapies.