In heterogeneous distributed computing (HC) systems, diversity can exist in both computational resources and arriving tasks. In an inconsistently heterogeneous computing system, task types have different execution times on heterogeneous machines. A method is required to map arriving tasks to machines based on machine availability and performance, maximizing the number of tasks meeting deadlines (defined as robustness). For tasks with hard deadlines (e.g., those in live video streaming), tasks that miss their deadlines are dropped. The problem investigated in this research is maximizing the robustness of an oversubscribed HC system. A way to maximize this robustness is to prune (i.e., defer or drop) tasks with low probability of meeting their deadlines to increase the probability of other tasks meeting their deadlines. In this paper, we first provide a mathematical model to estimate a task's probability of meeting its deadline in the presence of task dropping. We then investigate methods for engaging probabilistic dropping and we find thresholds for dropping and deferring. Next, we develop a pruning-aware mapping heuristic and extend it to engender fairness across various task types. We show the cost benefit of using probabilistic pruning in an HC system. Simulation results, harnessing a selection of mapping heuristics, show efficacy of the pruning mechanism in improving robustness (on average by 25%) and cost in an oversubscribed HC system by up to 40%.

Cloud-based serverless computing is an increasingly popular computing paradigm. In this paradigm, different services have diverse computing requirements that justify deploying an inconsistently Heterogeneous Computing (HC) system to efficiently process them. In an inconsistently HC system, each task needed for a given service, potentially exhibits different execution times on each type of machine. An ideal resource allocation system must be aware of such uncertainties in execution times and be robust against them, so that Quality of Service (QoS) requirements of users are met. This research aims to maximize the robustness of an HC system utilized to offer a serverless computing system, particularly when the system is oversubscribed. Our strategy to maximize robustness is to develop a task pruning mechanism that can be added to existing task-mapping heuristics without altering them. Pruning tasks with a low probability of meeting their deadlines improves the likelihood of other tasks meeting their deadlines, thereby increasing system robustness and overall QoS. To evaluate the impact of the pruning mechanism, we examine it on various configurations of heterogeneous and homogeneous computing systems. Evaluation results indicate a considerable improvement (up to 35%) in the system robustness.

Video streaming is growing in popularity and has become the most bandwidth-consuming Internet service. As such, robust streaming in terms of low latency and uninterrupted streaming experience, particularly for viewers in distant areas, has become a challenge. The common practice to reduce latency is to pre-process multiple versions of each video and use Content Delivery Networks (CDN) to cache videos that are popular in a geographical area. However, with the fast-growing video repository sizes, caching video contents in multiple versions on each CDN is becoming inefficient. Accordingly, in this paper, we propose the architecture for Fog Delivery Networks (FDN) and provide methods to federate them (called F-FDN) to reduce video streaming latency. In addition to caching, FDNs have the ability to process videos in an on-demand manner. F-FDN leverages cached contents on the neighboring FDNs to further reduce latency. In particular, F-FDN is equipped with methods that aim at reducing latency through probabilistically evaluating the cost benefit of fetching video segments either from neighboring FDNs or by processing them. Experimental results against alternative streaming methods show that both on-demand processing and leveraging cached video segments on neighboring FDNs can remarkably reduce streaming latency (on average 52%).

Cloud-based computing systems could get oversubscribed due to budget constraints of cloud users which causes violation of Quality of Experience (QoE) metrics such as tasks' deadlines. We investigate an approach to achieve robustness against uncertain task arrival and oversubscription through smart reuse of computation while similar tasks are waiting for execution. Our motivation in this study is a cloud-based video streaming engine that processes video streaming tasks in an on-demand manner. We propose a mechanism to identify various types of "mergeable" tasks and determine when it is appropriate to aggregate tasks without affecting QoS of other tasks. Experiment shows that our mechanism can improve robustness of the system and also saves the overall time of using cloud services by more than 14%.

Cloud providers offer a variety of execution platforms in form of bare-metal, VM, and containers. However, due to the pros and cons of each execution platform, choosing the appropriate platform for a specific cloud-based application has become a challenge for solution architects. The possibility to combine these platforms (e.g., deploying containers within VMs) offers new capacities that makes the challenge even further complicated. However, there is a little study in the literature on the pros and cons of deploying different application types on various execution platforms. In particular, evaluation of diverse hardware configurations and different CPU provisioning methods, such as CPU pinning, have not been sufficiently studied in the literature. In this work, the performance overhead of container, VM, and bare-metal execution platforms are measured and analyzed for four categories of real-world applications, namely video processing, parallel processing (MPI), web processing, and No-SQL, respectively representing CPU intensive, parallel processing, and two IO intensive processes. Our analyses reveal a set of interesting and sometimes counterintuitive findings that can be used as best practices by the solution architects to efficiently deploy cloud-based applications. Here are some notable mentions: (A) Under specific circumstances, containers can impose a higher overhead than VMs; (B) Containers on top of VMs can mitigate the overhead of VMs for certain applications; (C) Containers with a large number of cores impose a lower overhead than those with a few cores.