The main characteristics of mechanically ventilated ARDS patients affected with COVID-19, and the adherence to lung-protective ventilation strategies are not well known. We describe characteristics and outcomes of confirmed ARDS in COVID-19 patients managed with invasive mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective, observational study in consecutive, mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS (as defined by the Berlin criteria) affected with with COVID-19 (confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in nasal or pharyngeal swab specimens), admitted to a network of 36 Spanish and Andorran intensive care units (ICUs) between March 12 and June 1, 2020. We examined the clinical features, ventilatory management, and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 ARDS patients, and compared some results with other relevant studies in non-COVID-19 ARDS patients. Results: A total of 742 patients were analysed with complete 28-day outcome data: 128 (17.1%) with mild, 331 (44.6%) with moderate, and 283 (38.1%) with severe ARDS. At baseline, defined as the first day on invasive MV, median (IQR) values were: tidal volume 6.9 (6.3-7.8) ml/kg predicted body weight, positive end-expiratory pressure 12 (11-14) cmH 2 O. Values of respiratory system compliance 35 (27-45) ml/cmH 2 O, plateau pressure 25 (22-29) cmH 2 O, and driving pressure 12 (10-16) cmH 2 O were similar to values from non-COVID-19 ARDS patients observed in other studies. Recruitment maneuvers, prone position and neuromuscular blocking agents were used in 79%, 76% and 72% of patients, respectively. The risk of 28-day mortality was lower in mild ARDS [hazard ratio (RR) 0.56 (95% CI 0.33-0.93), p = 0.026] and moderate ARDS [hazard ratio (RR) 0.69 (95% CI 0.47-0.97), p = 0.035] when compared to severe ARDS. The 28-day mortality was similar to other observational studies in non-COVID-19 ARDS patients. Conclusions: In this large series, COVID-19 ARDS patients have features similar to other causes of ARDS, compliance with lung-protective ventilation was high, and the risk of 28-day mortality increased with the degree of ARDS severity.

Background Awake prone positioning (awake-PP) in non-intubated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients could avoid endotracheal intubation, reduce the use of critical care resources, and improve survival. We aimed to examine whether the combination of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO) with awake-PP prevents the need for intubation when compared to HFNO alone. Methods Prospective, multicenter, adjusted observational cohort study in consecutive COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) receiving respiratory support with HFNO from 12 March to 9 June 2020. Patients were classified as HFNO with or without awake-PP. Logistic models were fitted to predict treatment at baseline using the following variables: age, sex, obesity, non-respiratory Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, APACHE-II, C-reactive protein, days from symptoms onset to HFNO initiation, respiratory rate, and peripheral oxyhemoglobin saturation. We compared data on demographics, vital signs, laboratory markers, need for invasive mechanical ventilation, days to intubation, ICU length of stay, and ICU mortality between HFNO patients with and without awake-PP. Results A total of 1076 patients with COVID-19 ARF were admitted, of which 199 patients received HFNO and were analyzed. Fifty-five (27.6%) were pronated during HFNO; 60 (41%) and 22 (40%) patients from the HFNO and HFNO + awake-PP groups were intubated. The use of awake-PP as an adjunctive therapy to HFNO did not reduce the risk of intubation [RR 0.87 (95% CI 0.53–1.43), p = 0.60]. Patients treated with HFNO + awake-PP showed a trend for delay in intubation compared to HFNO alone [median 1 (interquartile range, IQR 1.0–2.5) vs 2 IQR 1.0–3.0] days (p = 0.055), but awake-PP did not affect 28-day mortality [RR 1.04 (95% CI 0.40–2.72), p = 0.92]. Conclusion In patients with COVID-19 ARF treated with HFNO, the use of awake-PP did not reduce the need for intubation or affect mortality.

Impact of the research: Although bilateral phrenic nerve stimulation did not increase the proportion of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation compared to the standard of care, it resulted in substantial improvements in inspiratory pressure generation capacity without major safety issues. In the absence of previous clinical data, these findings suggest that diaphragm pacing could be effective in mitigating diaphragm dysfunction in patients difficult to wean from mechanical ventilation. Author contributions:The academic authors (MD, MGDA, TS) wrote the first draft of the manuscript and verified the underlying data. All authors critically reviewed and approved the manuscript and are accountable its accuracy and integrity. Dr Martin Dres had full access to all the data in the study and takes full responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Teresa Nelson conducted and is responsible for the data analysis. Support:The study was funded by Lungpacer Medical Inc, PA, USA.

Detection of posttransplant donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies (DSA) constitutes a risk factor for kidney allograft loss. Together with complement activation, NK‐cell antibody‐dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) has been proposed to contribute to the microvascular damage associated to humoral rejection. In the present observational exploratory study, we have tried to find a relationship of circulating donor‐specific and nondonor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies (DSA and HLA non‐DSA) with peripheral blood NK‐cell subsets and clinical features in 393 renal allograft recipients. Multivariate analysis indicated that retransplantation and pretransplant sensitization were associated with detection of posttransplant DSA. Recipient female gender, DR mismatch and acute rejection were significantly associated with posttransplant DSA compared to HLA non‐DSA. In contrast with patients without detectable anti‐HLA antibodies, DSA and HLA non‐DSA patients displayed lower proportions of NK‐cells, associated with increased CD56bright and NKG2A+ subsets, the latter being more marked in DSA cases. These differences appeared unrelated to retransplantation, previous acute rejection or immunosuppressive therapy. Although preliminary and observational in nature, our results suggest that the assessment of the NK‐cell immunophenotype may contribute to define signatures of alloreactive humoral responses in renal allograft recipients.

Preformed HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) only detected with Luminex have been associated with increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and graft failure after kidney transplantation (KT). Their evolution after KT may modify this risk. We analyzed postransplant evolution of preformed DSA identified retrospectively and their impact on outcomes of 370 KT performed 2006-2014. Antibodies were monitored prospectively at 1-3-5 years after KT and if any dysfunction. Early acute ABMR was more frequent among patients with preformed DSA class-I or I + II than isolated class-II (29.4% vs 4.5%, p = 0.02). One year post-KT, 20 of 34 patients with functioning KT had persistent DSA. Preformed DSA class-II persisted more frequently than class-I/I + II (66.7% vs 33.3%; p = 0.031). The only risk factor independently associated with persistence was pretransplant MFI. Patients with de novo DSA had the highest risk of ABMR (HR 22.2 [CI 6.1-81.2]). Although recipients with persisting preformed DSA had significantly increased ABMR risk (HR 14.7 [CI 6.5-33.0]), those with cleared preformed DSA also had a higher risk than those without DSA (HR 7.01 [CI 2.2-21.8]). Preformed DSA are a very important risk factor for ABMR and graft loss. Patients who clear preformed DSA still show an increased risk of ABMR and graft loss after KT.