Seabirds that forage in dense groups can be especially vulnerable to anthropogenic threats at sea. To mitigate these threats to populations, nesting habitat restoration may be a viable option by reducing negative density dependence. Accordingly, we undertook a before‐after control‐impact (BACI) experiment to test whether habitat modification could be an effective means of restoring nesting habitat of crested auklets (Aethia cristatella) breeding on Gareloi Island, Alaska, USA. Despite supporting large numbers of crevice‐nesting auklets, many lava flows at Gareloi Island are in a stage of late vegetative succession that may prevent birds from accessing subterranean nesting habitat. We hypothesized that crested auklet density is highest in unvegetated blocky and porous lava, and predicted that removing vegetation from the surface would allow new recruits to secure previously unavailable nesting sites. In 2009 and 2010, we delineated 34 200‐m2 plots throughout the southeast colony at Gareloi, and color marked a subset of crested auklets landing in each plot to measure movement and abundance. We removed vegetative overgrowth and peat from half of each plot at the end of the 2009 (4 plots) and 2010 (30 plots) breeding seasons. Before and after vegetation removal, we counted the number of active nesting sites and calculated the ratio of banded to un‐banded breeders on the surface of each plot half. Overall, active nesting sites, number of individuals on the surface, and number of breeders landing did not increase after vegetation removal. However, among banded individuals that moved among plot halves, birds were 1.7 times more likely to move to a de‐vegetated plot half. Based on our experimental results, we found no evidence that vegetation removal increased crested auklet numbers at Gareloi Island, and thus in the short term this may not be a viable option for increasing crested auklet abundance. © 2016 The Wildlife Society.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Nest predation is the main cause of nest failure for ducks. Understanding how habitat features influence predator movements may facilitate management of upland and wetland breeding habitats that reduces predator encounter rates with duck nests and increases nest survival rates. For 1618 duck nests, nest survival increased with distance to phragmites (Phragmites australis), shrubs, telephone poles, human structures, and canals, but not for four other habitat features. Using GPS collars, we tracked 25 raccoons (Procyon lotor) and 16 striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) over 4 years during waterfowl breeding and found marked differences in how these predators were located relative to specific habitat features; moreover, the probability of duck nests being encountered by predators differed by species. Specifically, proximity to canals, wetlands, trees, levees/roads, human structures, shrubs, and telephone poles increased the likelihood of a nest being encountered by collared raccoons. For collared skunks, nests were more likely to be encountered if they were closer to canals, trees, and shrubs, and farther from wetlands and human structures. Most predator encounters with duck nests were attributable to a few individuals; 29.2% of raccoons and 38.5% of skunks were responsible for 95.6% of total nest encounters. During the central span of duck nesting (April 17–June 14: 58 nights), these seven raccoons and five skunks encountered >1 nest on 50.8 ± 29.2% (mean ± SD) and 41.5 ± 28.3% of nights, respectively, and of those nights individual raccoons and skunks averaged 2.60 ± 1.28 and 2.50 ± 1.09 nest encounters/night, respectively. For collared predators that encountered >1 nest, a higher proportion of nests encountered by skunks had evidence of predation (51.9 ± 26.6%) compared to nests encountered by raccoons (22.3 ± 17.1%). Because duck eggs were most likely consumed as raccoons and skunks opportunistically discovered nests, managing the habitat features those predators most strongly associated with could potentially reduce rates of egg predation.