Epidemiologic surveys of congenital anomalies such as EA, which is a rare disease, provide valuable data for public health authorities and fulfill one important mission of reference centers. When compared with previous epidemiological data, this national population-based registry suggests that the incidence of EA remains stable.
Type 1 congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation (CCAM), the most frequent malformation of the lung, is the only type to present intracystic mucinous cell clusters, which may form beyond the cysts extracystic mucinous proliferation resembling mucinous bronchioloalveolar carcinomas (BACs). As mucinous BACs are increasingly described in the literature in young patients with CCAM, we hypothesized that type 1 CCAM mucinous cells could represent BAC precursors. We reviewed 7 cases of type 1 CCAM including 6 with intracystic mucinous cell clusters, 3 with extracystic mucinous proliferations, and 4 with mucinous BAC or mixed adenocarcinoma with predominant BAC. K-ras mutations at codon 12 were detected in 3/3 intracystic mucinous cell clusters, in 2/3 extracystic mucinous proliferations, and in 3/4 BAC. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at p16(INK4) locus, with microsatellite alterations in 3 cases, was observed in 2/3 intracystic mucinous cell clusters, in 2/3 extracystic mucinous proliferations, and in all BAC. Two extracystic mucinous proliferations showed LOH at FHIT and Rb loci, respectively. P16(INK4) expression was lost in 2 intracystic mucinous cell clusters, 1 extracystic mucinous proliferation, and 1 BAC. Neither epidermal growth factor receptor mutation on exons 18, 19, and 21 nor P53 accumulation was observed. All lesions expressed MUC5AC, but were negative for MUC2, CDX2, and TTF-1. In conclusion, type 1 CCAM mucinous cells share the same differentiation profile with corresponding mucinous BAC, consistent with a common bronchial origin. Moreover, the high frequency of K-ras mutation and LOH and/or microsatellite alterations at p16(INK4) locus presented by these mucinous cells justifies their consideration as BAC precursors.
Background Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas (SPPN) can relapse very late, but little is known about risk factors for recurrence and optimal treatment. We aimed to identify risk factors for recurrence and to analyze treatment modalities in all French pediatric cases of SPPN over the past 20 years. Material and methods Data were collected from pediatric oncologists and surgeons, and also from adult pancreatic surgeons in order to identify late recurrences. Results Fifty‐one patients (41 girls) were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 13.1 years [8.7–17.9]. Abdominal pain was the commonest presenting symptom (32/49, 65%). The tumor was located in the pancreatic head in 24 patients (47%). Preoperative biopsy or cytology was performed in 14 cases (28%). All patients were operated with a median of 23 days [0–163] after diagnosis. The rate of postoperative morbidity was 29%. With a median follow‐up of 65 months [0.3–221], the overall and event‐free survival was 100% and 71%, respectively. Seven patients (13.7%) relapsed with a median of 43 months [33–94] after initial surgery. Six were treated surgically, either alone (n = 3) or with perioperative chemotherapy (n = 2) or hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (n = 1). One patient in whom further treatment was not feasible was still alive at last news. Risk factors for recurrence were positive surgical margins (P = 0.03) and age less than 13.5 years at diagnosis (P = 0.03). Conclusions SPPN recurrence in this pediatric series was a rare and late event that did not undermine overall survival. Complete surgical removal of recurrent tumors appears to be the best option.
BackgroundCongenital esophageal stenosis (CES) is a rare condition frequently associated with esophageal atresia (EA). There are limited data from small series about the presentation, treatment, and outcomes of CES.MethodsMedical records of all patients with CES included in the French Network on Esophageal Malformations and Congenital Diseases were reviewed retrospectively with regard to diagnosis, treatment, and outcome.ResultsOver 18 years, 61 patients (30 boys) had CES, and 29 (47%) of these patients also had EA. The mean age at diagnosis was 24 months (1 day to 14 years) and was younger in patients with CES and EA than in those with isolated CES (7 vs. 126 months, p < 0.05). Twenty-one of the 61 patients with CES had no clinical symptoms: in three patients, the findings were incidental, and in 18 of the 29 patients with associated EA, CES was diagnosed at the time of surgical repair of EA or during a postoperative systematic esophageal barium study. In the 40 other patients, at diagnosis, 50% presented with dysphasia, 40% with vomiting, 50% with food impaction, and 42% with respiratory symptoms. Diagnosis of CES was confirmed by esophageal barium study (56/61) and/or esophageal endoscopy (50/61). Sixteen patients had tracheobronchial remnants (TBR), 40 had fibromuscular stenosis (FMS), and five had membrane stenosis (MS). Thirty-four patients (56%) were treated by dilation only (13/34 remained asymptomatic at follow-up); 15 patients were treated by dilation but required later surgery because of failure (4/15 remained asymptomatic at follow-up); and nine patients had a primary surgical intervention (4/9 were asymptomatic at follow-up). Dilation was complicated by esophageal perforation in two patients (3.4%). At follow-up, dysphagia remained in 36% (21/58) of patients, but the incidence did not differ between the EA and the isolated CS groups (10/29 vs. 7/32, p = 0.27).ConclusionsCS diagnosis can be delayed when associated with EA. Dilation may be effective for treating patients with FMS and MS, but surgical repair is often required for those with TBR. Our results show clearly that, regardless of the therapeutic option, dysphagia occurs frequently, and patients with CES should be followed over the long term.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.