Some controversy remains about the clinical or pathological definition of the different types of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and especially the diagnostic and prognostic value of dermal lymphatic involvement. Our purpose was to classify the different types of IBC for which diagnosis was confirmed intraoperatively and ascertain features allowing reliable diagnosis. We studied clinical findings, biological data, and treatment outcome in a series of 144 successive patients. Our results suggest that there are 2 biologically different entities i.e., true IBC and pseudo-IBC. True IBC, whose course is currently fatal in all cases, can be divided into 2 sub-categories i.e., common true IBC (75.7% of cases), in which inflammatory signs occur primarily or secondarily, and occult true IBC (13.2% of cases). Dermal emboli have been observed in 61% of common true IBC, but their absence did not alter the rapidly unfavourable outcome. Extensive lymph-node involvement, other biological features and survival were the same in the 2 sub-categories. Pseudo-IBC (11.1% of cases) can easily be confused with common true IBC. The biological characteristics of pseudo-IBC differ from those of true IBC: no dermal lymphatic involvement and little or no lymph-node involvement. Despite large tumour size, outcome was particularly favourable. It is of great importance to differentiate true and pseudo-IBC, for which the treatments are different. Confirmation of true IBC requires pathological demonstration of dermal lymphatic emboli or extensive lymph-node involvement. Occult IBC must be identified for patients presenting rapidly growing tumours.

The relationship of age with prognostic factors and outcome of breast cancer has long been controversial due to numerous confounding factors. In order to clarify the prognostic value of age, we analyzed a homogeneous population of 1,266 patients treated for breast cancer at the same institution (mean follow-up: 62 months). Three groups were compared: patients under 35 years of age, non-menopausal patients over 35 years of age, and post-menopausal patients under the age of 70 years. A higher frequency of undifferentiated tumors, histoprognostic grade-3 cancer, microscopic lymph-node involvement and negative hormonal receptor status was observed in patients under 35 years. In addition, clinical but not anatomical tumor size was greater in young patients, suggesting higher stromal activity. Metastasis-free survival and overall survival were significantly poorer before 35 years. Differences were observed when patients were matched with regard to stage, anatomic size, histoprognostic grade, microscopic lymph-node involvement and receptor status. Multivariate analysis of both overall and metastasis-free survival demonstrated that age younger than 35 years was an independent risk factor. Younger women had a higher risk of local recurrence but, unlike older women, they did not experience any worsening of the already unfavorable outcome due to recurrence.

The relationship between pregnancy and the outcome of breast cancer remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic value of pregnancy at the time of diagnosis of primary infiltrating breast cancer. In a retrospective multi-center study we compared a group of 154 patients presenting pregnancy-associated (PA) breast cancer with a control group of 308 patients presenting non-pregnancy-associated (non-PA) breast cancer. Classic prognostic factors , treatment modalities, disease-free survival and overall survival were compared in the 2 groups. The relative importance of pregnancy was assessed by Cox multivariate analysis. There was a significantly higher proportion of inflammatory breast cancer, large tumors and negative receptor status in the PA group. Five-year recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survival were lower both in the whole PA group and in the PA subgroup excluding patients with inflammatory breast cancer than in the corresponding non-PA groups. According to clinical stage, histoprognostic grade and microscopic lymph-node involvement, probability of 5-year metastasis-free survival and overall survival was lower in the PA group. Outcome was significantly poorer after chemother-apy for patients in the PA subgroup than in the non-PA subgroup. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that pregnancy was an independent and significant prognostic factor. Pregnancy has an adverse effect on the outcome of breast cancer. Concurrent or recent pregnancy should be taken into account in the development of new systemic therapies. Our findings have important implications for further research into the basic mechanisms of cancer. Int. The relationship between pregnancy and breast cancer remains controversial. Recent series (De La Rochefordière et al., 1993; Bonnier et al., 1995b) and several registry-based studies (Adami et al., 1986) indicate that breast cancer has a poorer prognosis in younger women. Hormonal and immunologic changes associated with pregnancy could promote the growth and spread of breast cancer and modify response to treatment. However, published data concerning the effects of recent or concurrent pregnancy on the outcome of breast cancer present several limitations, such as a small patient population collected over long periods of time, failure to take age into account, comparison with unmatched controls, and unbalanced prognostic factors. Moreover, since breast cancer is uncommon during pregnancy, anecdotal case reports describing rapidly unfavorable outcomes have encouraged misinformation. The purpose of the present retrospective multi-institutional study was to analyze the prognostic value of pregnancy at the time of diagnosis of primary infiltrating breast cancer. We compared a group of 154 patients presenting pregnancy-associated (PA) breast cancer with a control group of 308 patients presenting non-pregnancy-associated (non-PA) breast cancer. The 2 groups were matched with regard to age and date of beginning of treatment. Classic prognostic fac...

The relationship between pregnancy and the outcome of breast cancer remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic value of pregnancy at the time of diagnosis of primary infiltrating breast cancer. In a retrospective multi-center study we compared a group of 154 patients presenting pregnancy-associated (PA) breast cancer with a control group of 308 patients presenting non-pregnancyassociated (non-PA) breast cancer. Classic prognostic factors, treatment modalities, disease-free survival and overall survival were compared in the 2 groups. The relative importance of pregnancy was assessed by Cox multivariate analysis. There was a significantly higher proportion of inflammatory breast cancer, large tumors and negative receptor status in the PA group. Five-year recurrence-free survival, metastasisfree survival and overall survival were lower both in the whole PA group and in the PA sub-group excluding patients with inflammatory breast cancer than in the corresponding non-PA groups. According to clinical stage, histoprognostic grade and microscopic lymph-node involvement, probability of 5-year metastasis-free survival and overall survival was lower in the PA group. Outcome was significantly poorer after chemotherapy for patients in the PA sub-group than in the non-PA sub-group. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that pregnancy was an independent and significant prognostic factor. Pregnancy has an adverse effect on the outcome of breast cancer. Concurrent or recent pregnancy should be taken into account in the development of new systemic therapies. Our findings have important implications for further research into the basic mechanisms of cancer. Int.

Hormone‐replacement therapy (HRT) is widely used by post‐menopausal women. Although this treatment may slightly increase the incidence of breast cancer, more and more cases are diagnosed while women are taking HRT. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the influence of HRT on prognostic factors and outcome of breast cancer. Data on all breast‐cancer patients, including precise information on HRT, was prospectively and systematically recorded in a data base. From 1985 to 1995, 1379 post‐menopausal women fulfilled the eligibility criteria for this study. All were treated by us (P.B. and L.P.) in our ward of a large public hospital of Marseilles, France. The clinical features, laboratory findings and survival rates in 142 HRT users who developed breast cancer while being treated were compared with those of 284 matched never user breast‐cancer patients. Patients who developed breast cancer during HRT had fewer locally advanced cancers and smaller and better‐differentiated cancers. Lymph‐node involvement was significantly less frequent in the user group than in the non‐user group (non‐significant). Estradiol receptivity was both qualitatively and quantitatively lower in users. There was no significant difference with regard to recurrence and metastasis‐free survival and overall survival. We conclude that HRT does not affect the prognosis of breast cancer. Regular surveillance during HRT allows early detection of smaller lesions. The higher number of well‐differentiated cancers and the distribution of hormone receptivity may reflect interaction between neoplastic tissue and exogenous hormones. Int. J. Cancer (Pred. Oncol.) 79:278–282, 1998.© 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.