Kinetics and pharmacologic effects of three formulations of nifedipine were examined in six healthy young men in a crossover design. Each subject received intravenous nifedipine, 0.015 mg/kg body weight, 20 mg in a capsule, and 20 mg in a slow-release tablet. Changes in heart rate (HR), blood pressure, heart dimensions, and plasma norepinephrine levels (PNE) were examined serially. Plasma concentrations of nifedipine (Cp) and urinary metabolite concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography. After intravenous injection the elimination t1/2 was 1.7 +/- 0.4 hr, systemic clearance was 26.7 +/- 5.4 l/hr, and volume of distribution was 0.8 +/- 0.2 l/kg. After the capsule, Cp rose rapidly, to a maximum concentration (Cmax) of 117 +/- 15 ng/ml at a maximum time (tmax) of 1.4 +/- 0.5 hr. After the sustained release tablet tmax was 4.2 +/- 0.7 hr and Cmax was 26 +/- 10 ng/ml. Nifedipine bioavailability was 56% +/- 25% for the capsule and 52% +/- 13% for the tablet, but there were large interindividual differences. Urinary excretion was 58% +/- 13% 24 hr after intravenous injection, and after 32 hr was 55% +/- 13% after capsules and 32% +/- 8% after tablets. HR increased briefly after intravenous injection and after capsules (15 to 20 bpm), but not significantly after tablets. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) fell briefly after capsules (8 to 10 mm Hg), but there was a sustained effect after tablets. Cardiac dimensions were unchanged. PNE levels paralleled plasma drug levels in the three experiments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

No abstract

The relevance of the rate of increase in the plasma concentration of nifedipine for the drug's hemodynamic effect was investigated in healthy volunteers. Nifedipine was given intravenously according to two regimens, each designed to produce the same steady-state concentration, but attained gradually (within 5 to 7 hours) with one regimen and rapidly (within 3 minutes) with the other. The mean steady-state concentrations obtained were 31.7 +/- 5.2 (SD) ng/ml and 29.4 +/- 9.8 ng/ml, respectively (not significant). With the gradual regimen, heart rate was unchanged and diastolic blood pressure was lowered gradually by approximately 10 mm Hg. With the rapid regimen, heart rate increased immediately and remained elevated for the duration of the infusion, whereas diastolic blood pressure did not change significantly. At the end of the gradual-rise regimen, the infusion rate was increased tenfold for 10 minutes, promptly resulting in tachycardia and a paradoxical rise in diastolic blood pressure. These divergent hemodynamic responses of the gradual- and rapid-rise regimens could well be related to differences in baroreceptor activation. It is concluded that the hemodynamic response to nifedipine is influenced by the rate of increase of its concentration in plasma.

The pharmacokinetics and hemodynamic effects of nifedipine were studied in patients with liver cirrhosis and in age-matched healthy control subjects. In a randomized order each subject received nifedipine by intravenous infusion (4.5 mg in 45 minutes) and as a tablet (20 mg). After intravenous nifedipine patients had a longer elimination t1/2 (420 +/- 254 vs. 111 +/- 22 minutes; P less than 0.01), a greater volume of distribution (1.29 +/- 0.60 vs. 0.97 +/- 0.42 L/kg), and a lower systemic clearance (233 +/- 109 vs. 588 +/- 140 ml/min; P less than 0.001). Plasma protein binding of nifedipine was lower in the patients (P less than 0.001). After oral nifedipine systemic availability was much higher in patients (90.5% +/- 26.2% vs. 51.1% +/- 17.1%; P less than 0.01) and maximal in patients with a portacaval shunt. Blood pressure decreased and heart rate increased after intravenous nifedipine and these effects could be fitted to plasma concentrations by a sigmoidal model. Maximal effects on heart rate and diastolic blood pressure were not different in liver cirrhosis. When free drug levels were considered, the concentrations corresponding to half the maximal effect were also not different. Blood pressure changes with oral nifedipine were comparable with those after intravenous infusion. We conclude that in patients with liver cirrhosis the pharmacokinetics of nifedipine are considerably altered; dose reduction is recommended when such patients need oral nifedipine.