No abstract

Forty-one Wagner revision stems were implanted at the Orthopedic Department of the University of Tübingen between July 1990 and January 1993. We report the results of 37 patients at an average follow-up of 27 months (13-48 months) postoperatively. The main indication was stem loosening with considerable loss of bone. In addition, we used the implant 4 times in primary arthroplasty. At follow-up examination 33 patients (89%) were satisfied with the postoperative outcome. According to the Merle D'Aubigné score (12-point scale), 32 patients showed a poor functional result of less than 6 points preoperatively. Postoperatively, the results of 36 patients could be classified as very good to good. To categorise the radiological destruction of the implant bed, we used the femoral shaft defect classification of the DGOT (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Traumatologie) in conjunction with the classification of Pak and Paproski [5, 11]. Twenty patients presented with trochanteric and calcar defects, and 11 patients with a combination of a calcar and shaft defect. We found a circular shaft defect in 2 patients. In 7 cases we assessed the bone remodelling postoperatively as very good, with strong newly formed bone structures, and in 25 cases as good, with remodelling of the old stem bed and bony structuring of the osteolyses. A secondary sinking in of the Wagner stem was seen in 7 cases. Only one stem had to be revised because of pain symptoms and loosening; in all other cases a secondary stabilisation of the revision-stem took place. With the Wagner revision stem, there is the possibility of achieving mechanical stability even in situations with massive bone loss. The evacuation of bone cement and granulation tissues is facilitated by the transfemoral approach, bony remodelling is accelerated, and bone grafting is often not necessary. As our short-term results show, the concept is a promising one. Nevertheless, we will be very careful in following these patients in the long term, as we have noticed stem sinkage in a small percentage of cases.

No abstract

No abstract

Introduction Soft tissue swelling of the knee joint can be caused by many diseases. Lipomas are one of the most reasonable differential diagnoses we have to consider. Therefore, we now present the uncommon case of a Lipoma arborescens (LA) and differentiate it from a quite similar manifesting spindle cell lipoma as follows. Case Report A 49-years old patient reports about progressive knee pain for four years and observes an increasing joint swelling. This swelling is a soft tissue, shiftable tumour, not painful. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast agent brings the diagnosis of an advanced osteoarthritis of the knee joint and classifies the tumour as LA. Subsequently, we treat the osteoarthritis by implanting a total knee arthroplasty with simultaneous intraoperative tumour resection performed as total synovectomy. The histopathological processing confirms the clinically and radiologically made diagnosis of LA. Summary Lipoma arborescens presents an uncommon subgroup of Lipomas, which is characterized by a slowly progressive increasing soft tissue swelling, especially around bigger human joints. Due to its intraarticular location, the LA might become clinically relevant when it reaches a certain tumour size. Looking at the diagnostics, sonography, MRI and especially the histopathological processing give the crucial results. Final proof can only be made by histopathological examination. Additionally, we have some differential diagnoses to exclude. Under these we predominantly find the spindle cell lipoma, synovial haemagioma, vascular synovial malformations and tenosynovial giant-cell tumour. Furthermore, an atypical lipomatous tumour should be excluded by FISH-analysis via determining the MDM2-Genamplification.