Previous cardiac valvular surgery, vascular prosthesis, aortic aneurysm, renal insufficiency, and older age increased risk.
Bronchial hyperresponsiveness is present in 40-60% of adult patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Drugs which alter airway hyperresponsiveness have not yet been studied in CF. In this randomized placebo-controlled study, we investigated the effects of an inhaled corticosteroid, budesonide, on lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in adult CF patients, with proven bronchial hyperresponsiveness to histamine. Twelve patients were treated with budesonide, 1600 micrograms day-1, and with placebo during two periods of 6 weeks in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. Drug effects were assessed with regard to bronchial hyperresponsiveness to histamine, spirometry and clinical symptom scores. After treatment with budesonide, no significant differences in spirometry were seen, however, bronchial hyperresponsiveness to histamine significantly improved as compared to baseline. Fifty-eight percent of the patients showed at least one doubling-dose increase in PC20 histamine. Daily symptom scores showed small, but statistically significant, improvements in dyspnoea and cough after budesonide treatment. There is increasing evidence suggesting that excessive inflammatory responses contribute to the pulmonary damage that characterizes CF. Treatment with oral corticosteroids improved the clinical course of selected CF patients, but was associated with unacceptable adverse effects. We conclude that daily inhalation of 1600 micrograms day-1 budesonide for 6 weeks induced a small, but significant, improvement in bronchial hyperresponsiveness to histamine, and symptoms of cough and dyspnoea in adult CF patients. Longer observations are needed to establish whether inhaled corticosteroids improve the long term outcome of CF.
PurposeIn 2007, a large goat-farming-associated Q fever outbreak occurred in the Netherlands. Data on the clinical outcome of Dutch Q fever patients are lacking. The current advocated follow-up strategy includes serological follow-up to detect evolution to chronic disease and cardiac screening at baseline to identify and prophylactically treat Q fever patients in case of valvulopathy. However, serological follow-up using commercially available tests is complicated by the lack of validated cut-off values. Furthermore, cardiac screening in the setting of a large outbreak has not been implemented previously. Therefore, we report here the clinical outcome, serological follow-up and cardiac screening data of the Q fever patients of the current ongoing outbreak.MethodsThe implementation of a protocol including clinical and serological follow-up at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after acute Q fever and screening echocardiography at baseline.ResultsEighty-five patients with acute Q fever were identified (male 62%, female 38%). An aspecific, flu-like illness was the most common clinical presentation. Persistent symptoms after acute Q fever were reported by 59% of patients at 6 months and 30% at 12 months follow-up. We observed a typical serological response to Coxiella burnetii infection in both anti-phase I and anti-phase II IgG antibodies, with an increase in antibody titres up to 3 months and a subsequent decrease in the following 9 months. Screening echocardiography was available for 66 (78%) out of 85 Q fever patients. Cardiac valvulopathy was present in 39 (59%) patients. None of the 85 patients developed chronic Q fever.ConclusionsClinical, serological and echocardiographic data of the current ongoing Dutch Q fever outbreak cohort are presented. Screening echocardiography is no longer part of the standard work-up of Q fever patients in the Netherlands.
These data support a sustained decrease in many aspects of health status in Q fever patients in The Netherlands, 1 year after primary infection.
BackgroundFrom 2007 to 2009, the Netherlands experienced a major Q fever epidemic, with higher hospitalization rates than the 2–5% reported in the literature for acute Q fever pneumonia and hepatitis. We describe epidemiological and clinical features of hospitalized acute Q fever patients and compared patients presenting with Q fever pneumonia with patients admitted for other forms of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We also examined whether proximity to infected ruminant farms was a risk factor for hospitalization.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted for all patients diagnosed and hospitalized with acute Q fever between 2007 and 2009 in one general hospital situated in the high incidence area in the south of the Netherlands. Pneumonia severity scores (PSI and CURB-65) of acute Q fever pneumonia patients (defined as infiltrate on a chest x-ray) were compared with data from CAP patients. Hepatitis was defined as a >twofold the reference value for alanine aminotransferase and for bilirubin.ResultsAmong the 183 hospitalized acute Q fever patients, 86.0% had pneumonia. Elevated liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase) were found in 32.3% of patients, although hepatitis was not observed in any of them. The most frequent clinical signs upon presentation were fever, cough and dyspnoea. The median duration of admission was five days. Acute Q fever pneumonia patients were younger, had less co-morbidity, and lower PSI and CURB-65 scores than other CAP patients. Anecdotal information from attending physicians suggests that some patients were admitted because of severe subjective dyspnoea, which was not included in the scoring systems. Proximity to an infected ruminant farm was not associated with hospitalization.ConclusionHospitalized Dutch acute Q fever patients mostly presented with fever and pneumonia. Patients with acute Q fever pneumonia were hospitalized despite low PSI and CURB-65 scores, presumably because subjective dyspnoea was not included in the scoring systems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.