Primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast (NECB) as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2012 is a rare, but possibly under-diagnosed entity. It is heterogeneous as it entails a wide spectrum of diseases comprising both well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the breast as well as highly aggressive small cell carcinomas. Retrospective screening of hospital charts of 612 patients (2008–2019) from our specialized outpatient unit for neuroendocrine neoplasia revealed five patients diagnosed with NECB. Given the low prevalence of these malignancies, correct diagnosis remains a challenge that requires an interdisciplinary approach. Specifically, NECB may be misclassified as carcinoma of the breast with neuroendocrine differentiation, carcinomas of the breast of no special type/invasive ductal carcinoma, or a metastasis to the breast. Therefore, this study presents multifaceted characteristics as well as the clinical course of these patients and discusses the five cases from our institution in the context of available literature.
For almost a decade, systemic therapy of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was limited to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sorafenib. Different agents including checkpoint inhibitors, TKIs and anti-VEGFR antibodies demonstrated efficacy in treatment. For the first time, the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab, a first-line treatment that is superior to the current standard was identified, potentially changing the way we treat HCC. In this review, we summarize current data on systemic treatment of patients with advanced HCC, focusing on combination therapies comprising immune checkpoint inhibitors, TKIs and locoregional therapies. We elucidate findings from recent trials and discuss such challenges as the lack of predictive biomarkers for identification of subgroups that will benefit from novel treatment strategies.
Background and Aims: The progression of chronic liver diseases towards liver cirrhosis is accompanied by drastic tissue changes. This study combines elaborate transcriptomic and histological methods aiming at spatially resolving the hepatic immune microenvironment in NAFLD (including NASH, primary sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary cholangitis, and severe alcoholic hepatitis). Approach and Results: Human liver samples were subjected to RNA-sequencing (n=225) and imaging cytometry (n=99) across 3 independent patient cohorts. Liver samples from alcoholic hepatitis and primary biliary cholangitis patients were used for comparison. Myeloid populations were further characterized in corresponding mouse models. Imaging, clinical, and phenotypical data were combined for multidimensional analysis. NAFLD/NASH and primary sclerosing cholangitis disease stages were associated with loss of parenchymal areas, increased ductular cell accumulation, and infiltration of immune cells. NASH patients predominantly exhibited myeloid cell accumulation, whereas primary sclerosing cholangitis patients additionally had pronounced lymphoid cell responses. Correlating to disease stage, both etiologies displayed intense IBA1+CD16lowCD163low macrophage aggregation in nonparenchymal areas, with a distinct spatial proximity to ductular cells. Mouse models revealed that disease-associated IBA1+ hepatic macrophages originated from bone marrow–derived monocytes. Using an unbiased, machine learning–based algorithm, IBA1 in combination with hepatocyte and ductular cell immunostaining–predicted advanced cirrhosis in human NASH, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and alcoholic hepatitis. Conclusions: Loss of hepatocytes and increased ductular reaction are tightly associated with monocyte-derived macrophage accumulation and represent the most prominent common immunological feature revealing the progression of NAFLD, primary sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary cholangitis, and alcoholic hepatitis, suggesting IBA1+CD163low macrophages are key pathogenic drivers of human liver disease progression across diverse etiologies.
The implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) into the clinical management of different malignancies has largely changed our understanding of cancer treatment. After having proven efficacy in different tumor entities such as malignant melanoma and lung cancer, ICI were intensively tested in the setting of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here they could achieve higher and more durable response rates compared to tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI), that were sole standard of care for the last decade. Most recently, ICI treatment was approved in a first line setting of HCC, for cases not suitable for curative strategies. However, only a subset of patients benefits from ICI therapy, while others experience rapid tumor progression, worsening of liver function and poor prognosis. Efforts are being made to find immune characteristics that predict tumor responsiveness to ICI, but no reliable biomarker could be identified so far. Nevertheless, data convincingly demonstrate that combination therapies (such as dual inhibition of PD-L1 and VEGF) are more effective than the application of single agents. In this review, we will briefly recapitulate the current algorithms for systemic treatment, discuss available results from checkpoint inhibitor trials and give an outlook on future directions of immunotherapy in HCC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.