Human activity and land use change impact every landscape on Earth, driving declines in many animal species while benefiting others. Species ecological and life history traits may predict success in human‐dominated landscapes such that only species with “winning” combinations of traits will persist in disturbed environments. However, this link between species traits and successful coexistence with humans remains obscured by the complexity of anthropogenic disturbances and variability among study systems. We compiled detection data for 24 mammal species from 61 populations across North America to quantify the effects of (1) the direct presence of people and (2) the human footprint (landscape modification) on mammal occurrence and activity levels. Thirty‐three percent of mammal species exhibited a net negative response (i.e., reduced occurrence or activity) to increasing human presence and/or footprint across populations, whereas 58% of species were positively associated with increasing disturbance. However, apparent benefits of human presence and footprint tended to decrease or disappear at higher disturbance levels, indicative of thresholds in mammal species’ capacity to tolerate disturbance or exploit human‐dominated landscapes. Species ecological and life history traits were strong predictors of their responses to human footprint, with increasing footprint favoring smaller, less carnivorous, faster‐reproducing species. The positive and negative effects of human presence were distributed more randomly with respect to species trait values, with apparent winners and losers across a range of body sizes and dietary guilds. Differential responses by some species to human presence and human footprint highlight the importance of considering these two forms of human disturbance separately when estimating anthropogenic impacts on wildlife. Our approach provides insights into the complex mechanisms through which human activities shape mammal communities globally, revealing the drivers of the loss of larger predators in human‐modified landscapes.

No abstract

In 2003–2004, we examined 8031 whitebark pine ( Pinus albicaulis Engelm.) trees and 3812 seedling-establishment sites in 170 plots for mortality and incidence of white pine blister rust ( Cronartium ribicola A. Dietr.). We found blister rust in all but four plots (98%), and 57% of all trees assessed for blister rust were either already dead or showed signs of blister rust infection. Mean percentage of trees infected was highest in the southern Canada – United States border area (∼73%), decreasing to a low in the northern region of Banff National Park, Alberta (∼16%), and then rising (∼60%) in the northern end of the study area in Jasper National Park, Alberta. Stands with higher infection, mortality, and canopy kill of trees and higher presence of rust on seedlings tended to be located on the western side of the Continental Divide. In the eight stands in Waterton Lakes National Park, Alberta, that had been previously assessed in 1996, infection levels increased from 43% to 71%, and mortality increased from 26% to 61%, whereas no change was apparent in Glacier National Park, Montana, stands. The impacts of high mortality and infection levels, high crown kill, and reduced regeneration potential, suggest that the long-term persistence of whitebark pine in the southern part of the study area is in jeopardy.