A b s t r a c tBackground: Permanent cardiac pacing is the treatment of choice for severe and symptomatic bradycardia. Patients undergoing emergency pacemaker implantation are stabilised earlier by the insertion of a temporary emergency pacing lead, and they experience more comorbidities than with planned admissions. Aim:To identify the parameters associated with one-year mortality and in-hospital adverse events after emergency permanent pacemaker implantation. Methods:This retrospective study analyses data from 131 consecutive emergency pacemaker implantations performed within a single centre. Results:Cox regression analysis revealed the independent predictors of death to be: use of a temporary transvenous pacing lead (TTPL) (HR = 2.82, 95% CI 1.21-6.58, p = 0.02), age ≥ 78 years (OR = 3.01, 95% CI 1.22-7.42, p = 0.02), longer baseline QRS duration (HR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.03, p = 0.03), and history of myocardial infarction (MI) (HR = 2.43, 95% CI 1.04-5.68, p = 0.04). Twenty-six patients experienced in-hospital adverse events, such as: death (n = 6), cardiac arrest (n = 3), surgical complications (lead dislocation: n = 4, haematoma: n = 4, microperforation: n = 2), pneumonia or respiratory tract disease (n = 7), wound infection treated with antibiotics (n = 1), and subsequent MI following pacemaker implantation (n = 2). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that independent parameters associated with in-hospital adverse events were history of MI (OR = 5.01, 95% CI 1.88-13.3, p = 0.001) and stroke (OR = 3.51, 95% CI 1.16-10.55, p = 0.03). Conclusions:Our results suggest that the most serious risk factors of one-year mortality related to the use of TTPL are: age ≥ 78 years, longer baseline QRS duration, and history of MI. The independent parameters associated with in-hospital adverse events were the presence of a history of MI and stroke.

Our study results suggest that AVD optimization in patients with DDD pacemaker with ICG improves hemodynamic when compared to the default factory settings. Furthermore, optimally programmed AVD reduces BNP and improves exercise tolerance and functional class.

Background & objectives:The clinical benefit of optimization (OPT) of atrioventricular delay (AVD) and interventricular delay (VVD) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains debatable. This study was aimed to determine the influence of AVD and VVD OPT on selected parameters in patients early after CRT implantation and at mid-term follow up (FU).Methods:Fifty two patients (61±10 yr, 23 males) with left bundle branch block, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35 per cent and heart failure were selected for CRT implantation. Early on the second day (2DFU) after CRT implantation, the patients were assigned to the OPT or the factory setting (FS) group. Haemodynamic and electrical parameters were evaluated at baseline, on 2DFU after CRT and mid-term FU [three-month FU (3MFU)]. Echocardiographic measures were assessed before implantation and at 3MFU. The AVD/VVD was deemed optimal for the highest cardiac output (CO) with impedance cardiography (ICG) monitoring.Results:On 2DFU, the AVD was shorter in the OPT group, LV was paced earlier than in FS group and CO was insignificantly higher in OPT group. At 3MFU, improvement of CO was observed only in OPT patients, but the intergroup difference was not significant. At 3MFU in OPT group, reduction of LV in terms of LV end-diastolic diameter (LVeDD), LV end-systolic diameter, LV end-diastolic and systolic volume with the improvement in LVEF was observed. In FS group, only a reduction in LVeDD was present. In OPT group, the paced QRS duration was shorter than in FS group patients.Interpretation & conclusions:CRT OPT of AVD and VVD with ICG was associated with a higher CO and better reverse LV remodelling. CO monitoring with ICG is a simple, non-invasive tool to optimize CRT devices.

(Cardiol J 2013; 20, 4: 411-417)

No abstract