SummaryRecent work established DNA replication stress as a crucial driver of genomic instability and a key event at the onset of cancer. Post-translational modifications play an important role in the cellular response to replication stress by regulating the activity of key components to prevent replication-stress-induced DNA damage. Here, we establish a far greater role for transcriptional control in determining the outcome of replication-stress-induced events than previously suspected. Sustained E2F-dependent transcription is both required and sufficient for many crucial checkpoint functions, including fork stalling, stabilization, and resolution. Importantly, we also find that, in the context of oncogene-induced replication stress, where increased E2F activity is thought to cause replication stress, E2F activity is required to limit levels of DNA damage. These data suggest a model in which cells experiencing oncogene-induced replication stress through deregulation of E2F-dependent transcription become addicted to E2F activity to cope with high levels of replication stress.

The coordination of cell proliferation with reversible cell cycle exit into quiescence is crucial for the development of multicellular organisms and for tissue homeostasis in the adult. The decision between quiescence and proliferation occurs at the restriction point, which is widely thought to be located in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, when cells integrate accumulated extracellular and intracellular signals to drive this binary cellular decision. On the molecular level, decision‐making is exerted through the activation of cyclin‐dependent kinases (CDKs). CDKs phosphorylate the retinoblastoma (Rb) transcriptional repressor to regulate the expression of cell cycle genes. Recently, the classical view of restriction point regulation has been challenged. Here, we review the latest findings on the activation of CDKs, Rb phosphorylation and the nature and position of the restriction point within the cell cycle.

How proteins in the bacterial cell division complex (the divisome) coordinate to divide bacteria remains unknown. To explore how these proteins collectively function, we conducted a complete dynamic characterization of the proteins involved, and then examined the function of FtsZ binding proteins (ZBPs) and their role in cytokinesis. We find that the divisome consists of two dynamically distinct subcomplexes: stationary ZBPs that transiently bind to treadmilling FtsZ filaments, and a directionally-moving complex that includes cell wall synthases. FtsZ filaments treadmill at steady state and the ZBPs have no effect on filament dynamics. Rather, ZBPs bundle FtsZ filaments, condensing them into Z rings. Z ring condensation increases the recruitment of cell wall synthesis enzymes to the division site, and this condensation is necessary for cytokinesis. Main Text:The mechanism by which bacteria divide remains poorly understood. In most bacteria, division begins when filaments of FtsZ, a tubulin homolog, form a "Z ring" at midcell (1). The Z ring then recruits other cell division proteins, collectively called the divisome (Fig 1A). The first group of these proteins (early proteins) arrives concurrently with FtsZ and includes the actin homolog FtsA and several other FtsZ binding proteins (ZBPs): EzrA, SepF, and ZapA. The second group of integral membrane proteins (late proteins) is then recruited, including DivIB, DivIC, and FtsL, and the cell wall synthesis enzymes Pbp2B and FtsW (2, 3). During cytokinesis, the Z ring constricts while the associated cell wall synthesis enzymes build a septum that divides the cell in half (4). Recent work has shown that FtsZ filaments treadmill around the division plane, moving at the same rate as the transpeptidase Pbp2B. (5, 6) (Movie S1). FtsZ treadmilling dynamics are critical for cell division: In Bacillus subtilis, the rate of treadmilling limits Pbp2B motion, the rate of septal cell wall synthesis, and the overall rate of septation (5).To understand how these proteins work to divide cells, we sought to build a dynamic characterization of how this multi-component machine functions in B. subtilis. We first worked to identify groups of divisome proteins that move together, then investigated how the FtsZ-.