Thioflavin T (ThT) has been widely used to investigate amyloid formation since 1989. While concerns have recently been raised about its use as a probe specific for amyloid, ThT still continues to be a very valuable tool for studying kinetic aspects of fibrillation and associated inhibition mechanisms. This review aims to provide a conceptual instruction manual, covering appropriate considerations and pitfalls related to the use of ThT. We start by giving a brief introduction to amyloid formation with focus on the morphology of different aggregate species, followed by a discussion of the quality of protein needed to obtain reliable fibrillation data. After an overview of the photochemical basis for ThT's amyloid binding properties and artifacts that may arise from this, we describe how to plan and analyze ThT assays. We conclude with recommendations for complementary techniques to address shortcomings in the ThT assay.

In systemic light chain amyloidosis, an overexpressed antibody light chain (LC) forms fibrils which deposit in organs and cause their failure. While it is well-established that mutations in the LC’s VL domain are important prerequisites, the mechanisms which render a patient LC amyloidogenic are ill-defined. In this study, we performed an in-depth analysis of the factors and mutations responsible for the pathogenic transformation of a patient-derived λ LC, by recombinantly expressing variants in E. coli. We show that proteolytic cleavage of the patient LC resulting in an isolated VL domain is essential for fibril formation. Out of 11 mutations in the patient VL, only one, a leucine to valine mutation, is responsible for fibril formation. It disrupts a hydrophobic network rendering the C-terminal segment of VL more dynamic and decreasing domain stability. Thus, the combination of proteolytic cleavage and the destabilizing mutation trigger conformational changes that turn the LC pathogenic.

Systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a fatal protein misfolding disease in which excessive secretion, misfolding, and subsequent aggregation of free antibody light chains eventually lead to deposition of amyloid plaques in various organs. Patient-specific mutations in the antibody V L domain are closely linked to the disease, but the molecular mechanisms by which certain mutations induce misfolding and amyloid aggregation of antibody domains are still poorly understood. Here, we compare a patient V L domain with its nonamyloidogenic germline counterpart and show that, out of the five mutations present, two of them strongly destabilize the protein and induce amyloid fibril formation. Surprisingly, the decisive, disease-causing mutations are located in the highly variable complementarity determining regions (CDRs) but exhibit a strong impact on the dynamics of conserved core regions of the patient V L domain. This effect seems to be based on a deviation from the canonical CDR structures of CDR2 and CDR3 induced by the substitutions. The amyloid-driving mutations are not necessarily involved in propagating fibril formation by providing specific side chain interactions within the fibril structure. Rather, they destabilize the V L domain in a specific way, increasing the dynamics of framework regions, which can then change their conformation to form the fibril core. These findings reveal unexpected influences of CDR-framework interactions on antibody architecture, stability, and amyloid propensity.