We have previously demonstrated the antiproliferative effect of two flavonoids-2,2'-dihydroxychalcone (DHC), a novel synthetic flavonoid, and fisetin, a naturally occurring flavonol-in prostate cancer cells. In this study, we further examine the mechanisms of these compounds on survival and proliferation pathways. DHC and fisetin (1-50 microM) caused a dose-dependent reduction in viability, a concomitant increase in apoptosis in PC3 cells at 72 h, and a decrease in clonogenic survival at 24 h treatment. DHC was considerably more potent than fisetin in these cytotoxicity assays. The mechanism of accelerated cellular senescence was not activated by either compound in PC3 or lymph node carcinoma of the prostate (LNCaP) cells. Gene expression alterations in PC3 and LNCaP cells treated with 15 muM DHC and 25 microM fisetin for 6 to 24 h were determined by oligonucleotide array. Amongst the most highly represented functional categories of genes altered by both compounds was the cell cycle category. In total, 100 cell cycle genes were altered by DHC and fisetin including 27 genes with key functions in G2/M phase that were downregulated by both compounds. Other functional categories altered included chromosome organization, apoptosis, and stress response. These results demonstrate the multiple mechanisms of antitumor activity of DHC and fisetin in prostate cancer cells in vitro.
Introduction: We sought to determine the effectiveness and safety of hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin (HCQ-AZM) therapy in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 613 patients hospitalized (integrated health system involving three hospitals) for RT-PCRconfirmed COVID-19 infection between March 1, 2020 and April 25, 2020. Intervention was treatment with HCQ-AZM in hospitalized patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Outcomes of interest were in-hospital all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, pulseless electrical activity (PEA) arrest, non-lethal arrhythmias, and length of hospital stay. Secondary measures included inhospital corrected QT (QTc) interval parameters and serum biomarkers levels. Results: Propensity-matched groups were composed of 173 patients given HCQ-AZM and 173 matched patients who did not receive treatment. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-2.89; p = 0.2), PEA arrest (OR 1.68, CI 0.68-4.15; p = 0.27), or incidence of non-lethal arrhythmias (10.4% vs. 6.8%; p = 0.28). Length of hospital stay (10.5 ± 7.4 vs. 5.8 ± 6.1; p \ 0.001), peak CRP levels (252 ± 136 vs. 166 ± 124; p \ 0.0001), and degree of QTc interval prolongation was higher for the HCQ-AZM group (28 ± 32 vs. 9 ± 32; p \ 0.0001), but there was no significant difference in incidence of sustained ventricular arrhythmias (2.8% vs. 1.7%; p = 0.52). HCQ-AZM was stopped in 10 patients because of QT interval prolongation and 1 patient because of drug-related polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Conclusion: In this propensity-matched study, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality, life-threatening arrhythmias, or incidence of PEA arrest between the HCQ-AZM and Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.