The excess risk of second malignancy after Hodgkin disease is an increasing problem. In light of the long-term data, guidelines for follow-up of survivors of Hodgkin disease need to be redefined. In this study we attempt to analyze the longterm risks and temporal trends, identify patient-and treatment-related risk factors, and determine the prognosis of patients who develop a second malignancy after radiation treatment with or without chemotherapy for Hodgkin disease. Among 1319 patients with clinical stage I-IV Hodgkin disease, 181 second malignancies and 18 third malignancies were observed. With a median follow-up of 12 years, the relative risk (RR) and absolute excess risk of second malignancy were 4.6 and 89.3/10 000 person-years. The RR was significantly higher with combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy (6.1) than with radiation therapy alone (4.0, P ؍ .015). The risk increased with increasing radiation field size (P ؍ .03) in patients who received combined modality therapy, and with time after Hodgkin disease. After 15 and 20 years, there was a 2.3% and 4.0% excess risk of second malignancy per person per year. The 5-year survival after development of a second malignancy was 38.1%, with the worst prognosis seen after acute leukemia and lung cancer. The excess risk of second malignancy after Hodgkin disease continues to be increased after 15 to 20 years, and there does not appear to be a plateau. Our analysis suggests that the risk may be reduced with smaller radiation fields, as are used in current trials of abbreviated chemotherapy and limitedfield radiation therapy.
Pathologic margin status and the use of adjuvant systemic therapy are the most important factors associated with LR among patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy.
Patients treated for early-stage Hodgkin's disease have a sustained excess mortality risk despite good control of the disease. Treatment reduction efforts in patients with early-stage, favorable-prognosis disease should continue, but for patients with an unfavorable prognosis, modified treatment may not be advisable. The excess mortality noted beyond two decades underscores the importance of long-term follow-up care in patients treated for Hodgkin's disease.
This study suggests that for patients ar substantial risk for systemic metastases, it is preferable to give a 12-week course of chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy, rather than radiation therapy followed by chemotherapy.
Background. The relationships among the involvement of tumor at the final margins of resection, the presence of an extensive intraductal component (EIC), and the risk of local recurrence are important considerations in patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer but have not been defined adequately. Methods. Between 1982 and 1985, 885 patients were treated for clinical Stage I or II invasive breast cancer. The study population was limited to 181 patients with an infiltrating ductal carcinoma who received a radiation dose to the surgical site of 60 Gy or greater, whose final microscopic margins of resection were evaluable, and who had at least 5 years of follow‐up. A positive margin was defined as tumor present at the inked margin of resection, a close margin as tumor within 1 mm of the inked margin, and a negative margin as no tumor within 1 mm of the inked margin. A focally positive margin was defined as tumor at the margin in three or fewer low‐power fields. In 157 patients (87%), the tumor was evaluable for the presence or absence of an EIC. The median follow‐up was 86 months. Results. In 12 of 181 patients (7%), a recurrence developed at or near the primary site (true recurrence/marginal miss [TR/MM]) within 5 years. The 5‐year rate of TR/MM (with 95% confidence intervals) among patients with negative, close, focally positive, and more than focally positive margins was 0% (0‐4%), 4% (0‐20%), 6% (1‐17%) and 21% (10‐37%), respectively. Patients with positive margins also were more likely to have a distant failure within 5 years (14%, 8%, 25%, and 32% in the four groups, respectively). However, patients with positive margins more often had positive axillary lymph nodes than patients with negative or close margins (59% vs. 38%, P < 0.02). The 5‐year rate of TR/MM was 20% for patients with an EIC‐positive tumor and 7% for patients with an EIC‐negative tumor. However, among the 127 patients with an EIC‐negative tumor, the 5‐year rate of TR/MM was less than 10% in all margin groups. Among the 30 patients with an EIC‐positive tumor, the 5‐year rate of TR/MM was 0% when margins were negative or close but 50% when margins were more than focally positive. Conclusions. These results provide support for the use of breast‐conserving surgery and breast irradiation in all patients with uninvolved margins, whether the tumor is EIC‐positive or EIC‐negative. This study suggests that breast‐conserving therapy (including a radiation boost to the primary site) also may be a reasonable option for some patients with an EIC‐negative tumor and margin involvement.
We produced capsids of Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) in a baculovirus expression system and developed a virus-like particle (VLP) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). To determine age-specific seroprevalence, serum samples were collected from 947 individuals attending hospital outpatient clinics and ranging in age from 1 to 93 years. To evaluate the association between exposure to MCPyV and Merkel cell cancer (MCC), plasma samples were obtained from 33 MCC patients and 37 controls. MCPyV seroprevalence was 45% in children under 10 years of age, increased to 60% in the next decade of life, and peaked at 81% among those 60 to 69 years of age. Levels of MCPyV capsid antibodies were positively correlated with age (P ؍ 0.007). Virus specificity of MCPyV seroreactivity was supported by competitive inhibition of reactivity by MCPyV VLPs and not by BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) VLPs. MCPyV seroprevalence was greater among MCC patients (91%) than controls (68%; age-adjusted P value, 0.32); the mean level of MCPyV antibodies was also greater (P ؍ 0.04). The age-specific seroprevalence of MCPyV shares with previously known polyomaviruses, BKPyV and JC polyomavirus (JCPyV), evidence of widespread exposure in human populations beginning early in life. MCPyV age-specific seroprevalence also has unique features. Seroprevalence among children is higher than that of JCPyV but lower than that of BKPyV. Among older adults, MCPyV seroprevalence remains high, while that of BKPyV declines and that of JCPyV continues to rise. In agreement with results from other studies, we found an association between MCPyV seropositivity and MCC, and higher levels of serum MCPyV capsid antibodies in MCC patients than in controls.Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV), a new human polyomavirus, was recently discovered by molecular techniques in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) (11), a rare and aggressive skin tumor (20,22). Studies from North America and Europe have detected MCPyV DNA by PCR in 69 to 100% of MCC tumors (1,9,11,13,14,17,25). The virus has also been detected in rare instances and in low copy numbers in cutaneous, gastrointestinal, and respiratory tract samples from healthy individuals (2,11,15). Little is known about the natural history of MCPyV infection in human populations. Serological assays can reveal the extent of past exposure to a virus and provide insights into its epidemiology. We and others have developed virus-like particle (VLP)-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) to measure antibodies to various human and animal polyomaviruses (10, 27, 31). Polyomavirus VLPs are empty viral capsids produced by expression of the gene for the major capsid protein, VP1, in a eukaryotic expression system. VLPs resemble native virions morphologically and retain their immunological properties, including the ability to bind antiviral capsid antibodies. We now report the development of a VLP-based ELISA to detect antibodies to MCPyV and its application for comparison of the age-specific seroprevalence of MCPyV to those of two other huma...
Previous studies of patients with infiltrating ductal breast cancer treated with conservative surgery (ie, limited excision) and radiotherapy have indicated that the presence of an extensive intraductal component (EIC) in the excision specimen is highly associated with subsequent breast recurrence. The reason for this association is not clear, but possible explanations include the presence of more extensive disease in the breast or increased radiation resistance among tumors with an EIC (EIC+) compared with those without (EIC-) tumors. To investigate this association further, we related the presence or absence of an EIC in the primary tumors of 214 women who underwent mastectomy to the likelihood of finding additional foci of cancer in their mastectomy specimens using a correlated pathologic-radiologic mapping technique. Primary tumors that were EIC+ were significantly more likely to have carcinoma in the remainder of the breast than those which were EIC--(74% v 42%; P = .00001). This difference was primarily due to the presence of residual intraductal carcinoma. Seventy-one percent of EIC+ patients had residual intraductal carcinoma compared with 28% of EIC-patients (P less than .00001). In particular, 44% of EIC+ patients had "prominent" residual intraductal carcinoma compared with 3% of EIC-patients (P less than .00001). We conclude that patients whose tumors contain an EIC more frequently have a large subclinical tumor burden in the remainder of the breast compared with patients whose tumors do not contain an EIC. This observation may explain the association between EIC and subsequent breast recurrence when patients are treated with a limited excision before radiotherapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.