Prostate cancer is the most common cancer affecting males in developed countries. It shows consistent evidence of familial aggregation, but the causes of this aggregation are mostly unknown. To identify common alleles associated with prostate cancer risk, we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) using blood DNA samples from 1,854 individuals with clinically detected prostate cancer diagnosed at

A B S T R A C T PurposeTo analyze the baseline clinicopathologic characteristics of prostate tumors with germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutations and the prognostic value of those mutations on prostate cancer (PCa) outcomes. Patients and MethodsThis study analyzed the tumor features and outcomes of 2,019 patients with PCa (18 BRCA1 carriers, 61 BRCA2 carriers, and 1,940 noncarriers). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate the associations between BRCA1/2 status and other PCa prognostic factors with overall survival (OS), cause-specific OS (CSS), CSS in localized PCa (CSS_M 0 ), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and CSS from metastasis (CSS_M 1 ). ResultsPCa with germline BRCA1/2 mutations were more frequently associated with Gleason Ն 8 (P ϭ .00003), T3/T4 stage (P ϭ .003), nodal involvement (P ϭ .00005), and metastases at diagnosis (P ϭ .005) than PCa in noncarriers. CSS was significantly longer in noncarriers than in carriers (15.7 v 8.6 years, multivariable analyses [MVA] P ϭ .015; hazard ratio [HR] ϭ 1.8). For localized PCa, 5-year CSS and MFS were significantly higher in noncarriers (96% v 82%; MVA P ϭ .01; HR ϭ 2.6%; and 93% v 77%; MVA P ϭ .009; HR ϭ 2.7, respectively). Subgroup analyses confirmed the poor outcomes in BRCA2 patients, whereas the role of BRCA1 was not well defined due to the limited size and follow-up in this subgroup. ConclusionOur results confirm that BRCA1/2 mutations confer a more aggressive PCa phenotype with a higher probability of nodal involvement and distant metastasis. BRCA mutations are associated with poor survival outcomes and this should be considered for tailoring clinical management of these patients.

BRCA-positive EOC patients have better outcomes than nonhereditary EOC patients. There exists a clinical syndrome of BRCAness that includes serous histology, high response rates to first and subsequent lines of platinum-based treatment, longer TFIs between relapses, and improved OS.

Prostate cancer (PrCa) is the most frequently diagnosed male cancer in developed countries. To identify common PrCa susceptibility alleles, we have previously conducted a genome-wide association study in which 541, 129 SNPs were genotyped in 1,854 PrCa cases with clinically detected disease and 1,894 controls. We have now evaluated promising associations in a second stage, in which we genotyped 43,671 SNPs in 3,650 PrCa cases and 3,940 controls, and a third stage, involving an additional 16,229 cases and 14,821 controls from 21 studies. In addition to previously identified loci, we identified a further seven new prostate cancer susceptibility loci on chromosomes 2, 4, 8, 11, and 22 (P=1.6×10 −8 to P=2.7×10 −33 ).Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) provide a powerful approach to identify common disease alleles. We previously conducted a GWAS 1 , based on genotyping of 541, 129 SNPs in 1,854 clinically detected PrCa cases and 1,894 controls (see Figure 1, stage 1). Follow-up genotyping of SNPs exhibiting strong evidence of association (P<10 −6 ), in a further 3,268 cases and 3,366 controls, allowed us to identify SNPs at 7 susceptibility loci associated with the disease at genome-wide levels of significance 1 . Other studies have identified an additional 8 loci [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] . These loci, however, explain only a small fraction of the familial risk of PrCa. Moreover, the strength of the associations that have been detected are generally small (perallele odds ratios, OR, 1.1-1.2), and the power of the existing studies to detect many of the susceptibility alleles has been limited. It is highly likely, therefore, that other PrCa predisposition loci exist, and that such loci should be detectable by studies with larger sample sizes.In an attempt to identify further susceptibility loci, we conducted a more extensive follow-up of SNPs showing evidence of association in stage 1 of our GWAS. We designed a panel of 47,120 SNPs, aiming to include all SNPs with a significant association in stage 1 at P-trend (1df)<.05 or P(2df)<.01 (see Online Methods). These SNPs were genotyped using the Illumina iSELECT platform in 3,894 PrCa cases and 4,055 controls from the United Kingdom (UK) and Australia ( Figure 1, stage 2). After quality control (QC) exclusions (as described in Online Methods), we utilised data from 43,671 SNPs in 3,650 PrCa cases and 3,940 controls. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptGenotype frequencies in cases and controls were compared using a 1 degree of freedom (df) Cochran-Armitage trend test (for QQ plots see Supplementary Figure 1). There was little evidence of inflation in the test statistics in the UK samples (estimated inflation factor λ=1.08), but there was more marked inflation in those from Australia (λ=1.23; λ=1.19 for stage 2 overall), suggestive of some population substructure. The Australian samples were selected from three studies (MCCS, RFPCS and EOPCS; see Supplementary Note for cohort descriptions), and further analysis revealed that ...