BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created significant obstacles within medical education. For medical students interested in pursuing neurosurgery as a specialty, the educational policies surrounding COVID-19 have resulted in unique challenges. The present study used a nationwide survey to identify the concerns of medical students interested in pursuing neurosurgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.-METHODS: Students who had previously registered for medical student neurosurgery training camps were sent an online Qualtrics survey requesting them to assess how the COVID-19 pandemic was affecting their neurosurgical education. The Pearson c 2 test and post hoc pairwise Fisher exact test were used for analysis of categorical variables, and the 2tailed paired Student t test was used for continuous variables.-RESULTS: The survey was distributed to 852 medical students, with 127 analyzed responses. Concerns regarding conferences and networking opportunities (63%), clinical experience (59%), and board examination scores (42%) were most frequently cited. Of the third-year medical students, 76% reported ‡1 cancelled or postponed neurosurgery rotation. On average, students were more likely to take 1 year off from medical school after than before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, measured from 0 to 100 (25.3 AE 36.0 vs. 39.5 AE 37.5; P [ 0.004). Virtual mentorship pairing was the highest rated educational intervention suggested by first-and second-year medical students. The third-and fourth-year medical students had cited virtual surgical skills workshops most frequently.-CONCLUSIONS: The results from the present nationwide survey have highlighted the concerns of medical students regarding their neurosurgery education during the COVID-19 pandemic. With these findings, neurosurgery organizations can consider targeted plans for students of each year to continue their education and development.

No abstract

Given serious consequences of maternal smoking, we aimed to develop and test a multicomponent behavioral intervention to enhance smoking cessation during pregnancy. In this nonconcurrent, multiple-baseline intervention pilot study, 48 daily smoking pregnant women (mean 13.7 weeks of gestation) were recruited from Buffalo, NY, USA. Upon completion of the repeated baseline smoking monitoring (up to 3 weeks), 30 continuous smokers received a contingent financial incentive-based intervention with three additional components (education and counseling, monitoring and feedback, and family support). After the quit date, participants met with counselors (~1 hr/visit) daily for 2 weeks and twice a week for another 6 weeks. Twenty-one out of 30 participants quit smoking completely (verified by urine cotinine) after receiving the intervention, and the other nine nonquitters decreased smoking substantially. The estimated smoking cessation rate was 70.0% (21/30) at the second week of the intervention, and 63.3% (19/30) at the conclusion of the 8-week intervention assuming the dropouts as smoking. In interrupted time series analysis, the mean daily number of cigarettes smoked among quitters decreased by 6.52, 5.34, and 4.67 among early, delayed, and late intervention groups, respectively. Quitters' mean urine cotinine level maintained stably high before the intervention but decreased rapidly to the nonsmoking range once the intervention was initiated. Most participants (85.7%) reported meeting or exceeding expectations, and 100% would recommend the program to others. This pilot multicomponent intervention was feasible and acceptable to most participants, resulting in a high smoking cessation rate among pregnant smokers who were unlikely to quit spontaneously.