No abstract

Purpose The most abundant among the separately collected waste materials in Italy is food waste. This research aims to evaluate the influence of the type of collection bag on the food waste management chain. In Italy, the food waste collection is mainly based on bioplastic bags. As an alternative, a new type of recycled paper bag shows potential advantages. Methods The two types of collection bag were compared evaluating the weight loss of food waste during the household storage, by means of an experimental assessment simulating the domestic dynamic bag filling. Moreover, the biomethane production of bags under anaerobic conditions was measured at the lab-scale level with Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) tests. Results During the household storage, the breathable fabric of the paper allows for higher weight losses, ranging on average between + 29 and + 44% compared to bioplastic. BMP tests, carried out under different conditions (temperature, inoculum), showed a 2–14 times higher generation of methane by paper bags compared to bioplastic bags, when referred to 1 kg of inserted food waste. Conclusions Collecting the food waste inside paper bags shows advantages compared to the use of bioplastic bags. First, the waste collection is benefitted thanks to the lower weight of material to be transported to treatment plants, leading also to the possibility of decreasing the collection frequency. Moreover, paper resulted more compatible than bioplastic with the anaerobic digestion treatment, which is currently rapidly increasing as a food waste management option. Graphic Abstract

The biochemical methane potential (BMP) of primary and biological sludge varies in a wide range, mostly depending on location, sewer characteristics, wastewater treatment plant design and operating conditions. BMP tests are useful to verify the performance of a full scale digester, but they are not yet a common procedure in the operation of most Italian facilities because of cost and test duration. Changes in the composition of sewage sludge can lead to a high variation of biogas production. Aimed at developing BMP predictive models based on low cost and fast analyses, this study investigated the chemical composition of 20 sludge samples by means of principal component and multiple linear regression analyses. Three preliminary predictive models were developed based on soluble organic nitrogen, volatile solids, carbohydrates, proteins, lipids and an operational parameter, the sludge retention time: the explained variance and the standard errors of prediction of BMP are in the range 77–81% and 21–34 NmLCH4·gVS−1, respectively. Models were evaluated on five additional samples: errors ranged 2–15% for four samples and about 54% for one sample, collected from a peculiar facility. Further data and variables describing the operation mode of the waterline would certainly improve the reliability and robustness of the models.

No abstract

Biogas production has been suggested as a valid valorization solution for microalgal/bacteria biomass (MAB) grown on wastewater. This research is aimed at assessing the feasibility to use MAB grown in an outdoor raceway fed on piggery wastewater for biogas production. Batch and continuous anaerobic tests were conducted on the sole MAB and on a blend of MAB and carbonaceous substrates (deproteinated cheese whey and cellulose) to improve the carbon/nitrogen ratio. Results of batch biochemical methane potential tests confirmed that the sole microalgal/bacteria biomass was poorly degradable (119 NmL·g), while blending it with deproteinated cheese whey or cellulose (80% of carbonaceous material and 20% of MAB, as chemical oxygen demand (COD)) had no synergistic effects on the methane yield, although slight improvements in the degradation kinetics were observed. Continuous anaerobic degradation tests (at an organic loading rate of 1.5 g·L·d, 35 °C and 30 days of hydraulic retention time) increased the overall methane yield from 81 NmL·g (sole MAB) to 216 NmL·g (MAB and deproteinated cheese whey) and 122 NmL·g (MAB and cheese whey). However, data confirm that no evident synergistic effects were obtained.