No abstract

Background: Myocardial injury (MI) can be detected during the acute phase of Coronavirus disease 19 and is associated with a dismal prognosis. Recent imaging studies described the persistence of cardiac abnormalities after the recovery. The aim of the study was to investigate the spectrum of cardiac abnormalities at mid-term follow-up in patients recovered from COVID-19 using clinical assessment, laboratory tests, and imaging evaluation with comprehensive echocardiography.Methods: This is an observational, cross-sectional study assessing an unselected cohort of consecutive patients recovered from COVID-19. MI was defined by elevated plasma levels of high sensitive troponin T (hsTnT). At the follow-up, a complete examination including echocardiography was performed. Results:The 123 patients included were divided into two groups according to the presence of MI during hospitalization: group A (without MI) and group B (with MI). After a median of 85 days, group B patients were more frequently symptomatic for dyspnea and had significantly higher values of hsTnT and N-Terminal prohormone of Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP), compared to Group A. No differences between the 1778

Far from being historically considered a primary healthcare problem, tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has recently gained much attention from the scientific community. In fact, in the last years, robust evidence has emerged regarding the epidemiological impact of TR, whose prevalence seems to be similar to that of other valvulopathies, such as aortic stenosis, with an estimated up to 4% of people >75 years affected by at least moderate TR in the United States, and up to 23% among patients suffering from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. This recurrent coexistence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and TR is not surprising, considered the multiple etiologies of tricuspid valve disease. TR can complicate heart failure mostly as a functional disease, because of pulmonary hypertension (PH), subsequent to elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, leading to right ventricular dilatation, and valve tethering. Moreover, the so-called “functional isolated” TR can occur, in the absence of PH, as a result of right atrial dilatation associated with atrial fibrillation, a common finding in patients with LVSD. Finally, TR can result as a iatrogenic consequence of transvalvular lead insertion, another frequent scenario in this cohort of patients. Nonetheless, despite the significant coincidence of these two conditions, their mutual relation, and the independent prognostic role of TR is still a matter of debate. Whether significant TR is just a marker for advanced left-heart disease, or a crucial potential therapeutical target, remains unclear. Aim of the authors in this review is to present an update concerning the epidemiological features and the clinical burden of TR in the context of LVSD, its prognostic value, and the potential benefit for early tricuspid intervention in patients affected by contemporary TR and LVSD.

Aims Infection by SARS‐CoV‐2 may result in a systemic disease and a proportion of patients ranging 15%–44% experienced cardiac injury (CI) diagnosed by abnormal troponin levels. The aim of the present study was to analyse the clinical characteristics of a large series of hospitalized patients for COVID‐19 in order to identify predisposing and/or protective factors of CI and the outcome. Methods and results This is an observational, retrospective study on patients hospitalized in two Italian centres (San Raffaele Hospital and Cremona Hospital) for COVID‐19 and at least one high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs‐cTnt) measurement during hospitalization. CI was defined if at least one hs‐cTnt value was above the 99th percentile. The primary end‐point was the occurrence of CI during hospitalization. We included 750 patients (median age 67, IQR 56–77 years; 69% males), of whom 46.9% had history of hypertension, 14.7% of chronic coronary disease and 22.3% of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Abnormal troponin levels (median troponin 74, IQR 34–147 ng/l) were detected in 390 patients (52%) during the hospitalization. At multivariable analysis age, CKD, cancer, C‐reactive protein (CRP) levels were independently associated with CI. Independent predictors of very high troponin levels were chronic kidney disease and CRP levels. Patients with CI showed higher rate of all‐cause mortality (40.0% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.001) compared to those without CI. Conclusion This large, multicentre Italian study confirmed the high prevalence of CI and its prognostic role in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19, highlighting the leading role of systemic inflammation for the occurrence of CI.

No abstract