Spontaneous remission is a well known characteristic of idiopathic membranous nephropathy, but contemporary studies describing predictors of remission and long-term outcomes are lacking. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of 328 patients with nephrotic syndrome resulting from idiopathic membranous nephropathy that initially received conservative therapy. Spontaneous remission occurred in 104 (32%) patients: proteinuria progressively declined after diagnosis until remission of disease at 14.7 Ϯ 11.4 months. Although spontaneous remission was more frequent with lower levels of baseline proteinuria, it also frequently occurred in patients with massive proteinuria: 26% among those with baseline proteinuria 8 to 12 g/24 h and 22% among those with proteinuria Ͼ12 g/24 h. Baseline serum creatinine and proteinuria, treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists, and a Ͼ50% decline of proteinuria from baseline during the first year of follow-up were significant independent predictors for spontaneous remission. Only six patients (5.7%) experienced a relapse of nephrotic syndrome. The incidence of death and ESRD were significantly lower among patients with spontaneous remission. In conclusion, spontaneous remission is common among patients with nephrotic syndrome resulting from membranous nephropathy and carries a favorable long-term outcome with a low incidence of relapse. A decrease in proteinuria Ͼ50% from baseline during the first year predicts spontaneous remission.

We evaluated the use of telemedicine in the long-term control of stable patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis at home. From September 2003 to August 2005, patients were randomly selected from current cases and invited to join study group A, in which they had telemedicine support. Patients not selected for this group, or who refused the invitation, were placed in study group B, and used for comparison. There were 25 patients in group A and 32 patients in group B. Videoconferencing equipment was installed in each patient's home, connected to a videoconferencing unit at the hospital by three ISDN lines. Patients in group A were followed for a mean of 8 months (range 3-24) with alternate months of teleconsultations and hospital visits. A total of 172 teleconsultations were conducted. A mean of 22 min (SD 9) were spent on each teleconsultation, significantly less than in hospital consultations, which took a mean of 33 min (SD 8) (P<0.01). In 148 teleconsultations (89%) medical treatment was modified. In 4 cases (2%) patients needed a hospital visit. In all instances (100%) the condition of the catheter exit site and the presence of oedema could be evaluated. In group A, the estimated cost of telemedicine was euro198 and that of a hospital visit was euro177. The mean hospitalization rate was 2.2 days/patient/year in group A and 5.7 days/patient/year in group B (P<0.05). Home telemedicine appears to be clinically useful in the long-term follow-up of stable patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis, and the costs and savings also seem to be encouraging.

Background and objectives Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis represents an emerging cause of acute kidney disease, especially among polymedicated elderly patients. Although corticosteroids are frequently used, controversy exists about the timing of initiation, efficacy, safety, and duration of treatment.Design, setting, participants, & measurements We performed a retrospective study of 182 patients with biopsy-proven drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis from 13 Spanish centers. Exposure was defined as the length of corticosteroid treatment. The main outcome was the level of serum creatinine at month 6, with respect to baseline values. ResultsThe most common offending agents were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (27%). In 30% of patients, the offending drug could not be identified. The median time to suspected drug withdrawal was 11 days (interquartile range, 5-22). All patients presented with acute kidney disease and were treated with corticosteroids. The mean initial dose of prednisone was 0.860.2 mg/kg per day. High-dose corticosteroid treatment was maintained for 2 weeks (interquartile range, 1-4). After 6 months, the mean recovered GFR was 34626 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 and ten patients required maintenance dialysis. Use of high-dose corticosteroids for 3 weeks or treatment duration .8 weeks were not associated with better recovery of kidney function. In the multivariable analysis, delayed onset of steroid treatment (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 1.04) and the presence of interstitial fibrosis of .50% on the kidney biopsy specimen (odds ratio, 8.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.7 to 27.4) were both associated with serum creatinine level at month 6 of .75%, with respect to baseline values.Conclusions High-dose corticosteroid treatment for 3 weeks or prolonged treatment for .8 weeks were not associated with greater kidney function recovery in drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis. A delay in the initiation of corticosteroids resulted in worse recovery of kidney function.

The prevalence of inflammation is high in pre-dialysis patients. High serum CRP levels predict a constant inflammatory state on follow-up. As occurs in dialysis patients, pre-dialysis inflammation predicts lower serum albumin concentration, poorer response to Epo, and a higher hospitalization rate. The decline in renal function does not seem to be related to the inflammatory state. Mortality was not affected on short-term follow-up.

Background/Aim: Sodium and water retention is common in peritoneal dialysis patients and contributes to cardiovascular disease. As peritoneal sodium removal depends partly on dwell time, and automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) often uses short dwell time exchanges, the aim of this study was to compare the 24-hour peritoneal sodium removal in APD and standard continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients and to analyze its possible influence on blood pressure control. Methods: A total of 53 sodium balance studies (30 in APD and 23 in CAPD) were performed in 36 stable peritoneal dialysis patients. The 24-hour net removal of sodium was calculated as follows: M = ViCi – VdCd, where Vd is the 24-hour drained volume, Cd is the solute sodium concentration in Vd, Vi is the amount of solution used during a 24-hour period, and Ci is the sodium concentration in Vi. Peritoneal sodium removal was compared between APD and CAPD patients. Residual renal function, serum sodium concentration, daily urinary sodium losses, weekly peritoneal Kt/V and creatinine clearance, 4-hour dialysate/plasma creatinine ratio, proportion of hypertonic solutions, net ultrafiltration, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and need for antihypertensive therapy were also compared between the groups. Results: Peritoneal sodium removal was higher (p < 0.001) in CAPD than in APD patients. There were no significant differences in residual renal function, serum sodium concentration, urinary sodium losses, peritoneal urea or creatinine clearances, 4-hour dialysate/plasma creatinine ratio, or proportion of hypertonic solutions between groups. The net ultrafiltration was higher in CAPD patients and correlated strongly (r = 0.82; p < 0.001) with peritoneal sodium removal. In APD patients, peritoneal sodium removal increased significantly only in those patients with a second daytime exchange. The systolic blood pressure was higher (p < 0.05) in APD patients, and the proportion of patients with antihypertensive therapy was also higher in APD patients, although no significant relationship between blood pressure values and amount of peritoneal sodium removal was found. Conclusions: The 24-hour sodium removal is higher in CAPD than in APD patients, and there is a trend towards better hypertension control in CAPD patients. As hypertension control and volume status are important indices of peritoneal dialysis adequacy, our results have to be considered in the choice of the peritoneal dialysis modality.