PURPOSE Patients seeking care for medically unexplained physical symptoms pose a major challenge at primary care sites, and there are very few wellaccepted and properly evaluated interventions to manage such patients. METHODSWe tested the effectiveness of a cognitive behavior therapy (CBT)-type intervention delivered in primary care for patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either the intervention plus a consultation letter or usual clinical care plus a consultation letter. Physical and psychiatric symptoms were assessed at baseline, at the end of treatment, and at a 6-month follow-up. All treatments and assessments took place at the same primary care clinic where patients sought care.RESULTS A signifi cantly greater proportion of patients in the intervention group had physical symptoms rated by clinicians as "very much improved" or "much improved" compared with those in the usual care group (60% vs 25.8%; odds ratio = 4.1; 95% confi dence interval, 1.9-8.8; P <.001). The intervention's effect on unexplained physical symptoms was greatest at treatment completion, led to relief of symptoms in more than one-half of the patients, and persisted months after the intervention, although its effectiveness gradually diminished. The intervention also led to signifi cant improvements in patient-reported levels of physical symptoms, patient-rated severity of physical symptoms, and clinician-rated depression, but these effects were no longer noticeable at follow-up.CONCLUSIONS This time-limited, CBT-type intervention signifi cantly ameliorated unexplained physical complaints of patients seen in primary care and offers an alternative for managing these common and problematic complaints in primary care settings.

No abstract

No abstract

Worldwide, patients with common mental disorders, such as depression and anxiety, have a tendency to present first to primary care exhibiting idiopathic physical symptoms. Typically, these symptoms consist of pain and other physical complaints that remain medically unexplained. While in the past, traditional psychopathology emphasized the relevance of somatic presentations for disorders, such as depression, in the last few decades, the “somatic component” has been neglected in the assessment and treatment of psychiatric patients. Medical specialties have come up with a variety of “fashionable” labels to characterize these patients and the new psychiatric nomenclatures, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, attempt to classify these patients into a separate “somatoform disorders” category. These efforts fall short, and revisionists are asking altogether for the elimination of “somatoform disorders” from future nomenclatures.This review emphasizes the importance of idiopathic physical symptoms to the clinical phenomenology of many psychiatric disorders, offers suggestions to the diagnostic conundrum, and provides some hints for the proper assessment and management of patients with these common syndromes.

A history of four or more PNS is common among somatizing patients in primary care and associated with a more severe clinical presentation, even after controlling for other factors known to be associated with severity. Four or more PNS may identify a distinct subgroup of somatization and serve as a clinical indicator for identifying psychiatric disorders in primary care. Future studies should explore the assessment of PNS using briefer measures. Furthermore, PNS should be evaluated with samples more representative of US primary care populations, as well as samples that include adequate representation from other ethnic backgrounds (eg, African-American, Asian, etc.).