Purpose To investigate the influence of ethnic origin on the incidence of keratoconus and the association of atopic diseases in patients with keratoconus. Methods Retrospective study of new patients referred to Dewsbury District General Hospital and diagnosed with keratoconus in a 6-year period between 1994 and 2000. The ethnic origin of the patient was defined as white, Asian, or other. Incidence was calculated from the catchment population of 176 774 (82% white people, 17% Asians, 1% others). t-Test, confidence intervals and v 2 tests were used to show statistical significance. Results A total of 74 cases of keratoconus were diagnosed over this period. Of these patients 29 (39%) were white and 45 (61%) were Asian. This equated to an incidence of keratoconus of 25 per 100 000 (1 in 4000) per year for Asians, compared with 3.3 per 100 000 (1 in 30 000) per year for white people (Po0.001). Asians presented significantly younger than white patients. The incidence of atopic disease was found to be significantly higher in white compared to Asian keratoconic patients. Conclusions Asians were significantly more likely to present with keratoconus. The Asian patients were mostly of Northern Pakistani origin. This community has a tradition of consanguineous, especially first-cousin marriages. The higher incidence in this population was highly suggestive of a genetic factor being significant in the aetiology. The incidence was higher than revealed by previous studies. Atopic disease was significantly less common in Asians compared to white people, supporting the theory of a different aetiology in these patients.
ObjectiveThough one of the most common surgeries, there is limited information on variability of practices in cataract surgeries. ‘Eyefficiency’ is a cataract surgical services auditing tool to help global units improve their surgical productivity and reduce their costs, waste generation and carbon footprint. The aim of the present research is to identify variability and efficiency opportunities in cataract surgical practices globally.Methods and Analysis9 global cataract surgical facilities used the Eyefficiency tool to collect facility-level data (staffing, pathway steps, costs of supplies and energy use), and live time-and-motion data. A point person from each site gathered and reported data on 1 week or 30 consecutive cataract surgeries. Environmental life cycle assessment and descriptive statistics were used to quantify productivity, costs and carbon footprint. The main outcomes were estimates of productivity, costs, greenhouse gas emissions, and solid waste generation per-case at each site.ResultsNine participating sites recorded 475 cataract extractions (a mix of phacoemulsification and manual small incision). Cases per hour ranged from 1.7 to 4.48 at single-bed sites and 1.47 to 4.25 at dual-bed sites. Average per-case expenditures ranged between £31.55 and £399.34, with a majority of costs attributable to medical equipment and supplies. Average solid waste ranged between 0.19 kg and 4.27 kg per phacoemulsification, and greenhouse gases ranged from 41 kg carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) to 130 kg CO2e per phacoemulsification.ConclusionResults demonstrate the global diversity of cataract surgical services and non-clinical metrics. Eyefficiency supports local decision-making for resource efficiency and could help identify regional or global best practices for optimising productivity, costs and environmental impact of cataract surgery.
Background
Cataract extraction is the most frequently performed surgical intervention in the world and demand is rising due to an ageing demography. One option to address this challenge is to offer selected patients immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS). This study aims to investigate patient and operative characteristics for ISBCS and delayed bilateral cataract surgery (DSCS) in the UK.
Methods
Data were analysed from the Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ National Ophthalmology Database Audit (NOD) of cataract surgery. Eligible patients were those undergoing bilateral cataract extraction from centres with a record of at least one ISBCS operation between 01/04/2010 and 31/08/2018. Variable frequency comparison was undertaken with chi-square tests.
Results
During the study period, 1073 patients had ISBCS and 248,341 DSCS from 73 centres. A higher proportion of ISBCS patients were unable to lie flat (11.3% vs. 1.8%;
p
< 0.001), unable to cooperate (9.7% vs. 2.7%;
p
< 0.001); underwent general anaesthesia (58.7% vs. 6.6% (
p
< 0.001)); had brunescent/white/mature cataracts (odds ratio (OR) 5.118); no fundal view/vitreous opacities (OR 8.381); had worse pre-operative acuity 0.60 LogMAR ISBCS vs. 0.50 (first) and 0.40 (second eye) DSCS and were younger (mean ages, 71.5 vs. 75.6 years;
p
< 0.001). Posterior capsular rupture (PCR) rates adjusted for case complexity were comparable (0.98% ISBCS and 0.78% DSCS).
Conclusions
ISBCS was performed on younger patients, with difficulty cooperating and lying flat, worse pre-operative vision, higher rates of known PCR risk factors and more frequent use of general anaesthesia than DSCS in centres recorded on NOD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.