Objective:The treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is evolving, with the development of new surgical techniques. |We wanted to study if modified Dunn procedure restores the normal alignment of the proximal femur and the risk of avascular necrosis is increased.Methods:This is a single centre, retrospective study, comparing the outcomes of in situ pinning and modified Dunn procedure. Between 2001 and 2014, 7 children (7 hips) underwent the modified Dunn procedure and 10 children (10 hips) pinning in situ for stable and unstable SCFE. Mean age of the patients was 12.7 years with a median follow-up of 18 months.Results:The radiological parameters improved in the modified Dunn procedure group, while the length of the femoral neck didn’t change significantly (p=0.09). Postoperative clinical outcomes were slightly better in the modified Dunn procedure group (6 hips out of 7 had good and excellent results) compared to the pinning in situ group (8 good and excellent results out of 10 hips) (p=0.04). No avascular necrosis was found and there were no cases of chondrolysis.Conclusion:Radiographic parameters of the proximal femur assessed in our study improved in all hips that underwent modified Dunn procedure, without the creation of secondary deformities.

Joint hyperlaxity could be a protective factor for clubfoot relapse.

Purpose Although many short-term studies have shown the superiority of Ponseti treatment to surgical treatment, studies with long-term follow-up of patients into adolescence are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the morphological, functional and radiological results of the two methods into and during adolescent age, when both soft tissue and bony procedures can be performed to correct residual deformities. Patients and Methods We retrospectively evaluated two groups of patients diagnosed with congenital idiopathic clubfoot and treated with either the Ponseti method (34 clubfeet) and surgery in the form of posteromedial release (31 clubfeet). All included clubfeet were clinically fully corrected after initial treatment and final plaster removal. Evaluation was performed with the International Clubfoot Study Group (ICFSG) score. Results The age at follow-up was 12.8±1.6 years in the Ponseti group and 13.5±1.7 years in the surgical group. Excellent or good results were obtained in 26 feet (76%) of the Ponseti group and in 14 feet (45%) in the surgical group. The Ponseti treatment was significantly superior to posteromedial release in terms of the final score (10.58±6.49 versus 17.26±8.83, p<0.001), functional score (p<0.001) and radiological score (p<0.001). Residual deformities were clinically present in both groups but were less frequent and less severe in Ponseti-treated patients. Flat-top talus was found to be present in both groups, but the Ponseti method was more protective than surgical treatment against this outcome (relative risk=0.494, p=0.002). The overall foot and ankle mobility was significantly better in the Ponseti group (p<0.001). Conclusion The Ponseti method was superior to surgery for treatment of clubfoot and achieved better long-term morphological, functional and radiological results. It preserves better mobility of the foot and ankle, and results in less frequent and less severe residual deformities than surgical treatment.

A unique case of combined anterolateral, anterior, and anteromedial ankle impingement in an adolescent soccer player is presented in this article. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only report of circumferential, massive, anterior ankle impingement in children described in the literature. The importance of proper diagnosis and treatment of such a lesion is illustrated in this case report. We also emphasize that clinical examination combined with 3D computed tomography scan reconstruction is an excellent and cost-effective imaging modality that can help with the diagnosis of anterior ankle impingement. Finally, open surgical treatment showed excellent results in an elite athlete.

Background and aimDevelopmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a potentially disabling disease. There are many diagnostic approaches, Graf method ultrasonography being the most popular imaging method. Although considered as a healthy condition, the existence of hips at the 60 degree limit or the asymmetries higher than 4 degrees between left and right side may be a source of unfavorable evolution and consequently of late diagnosed dysplasia cases.MethodsThe retrospective study was conducted in the Radiology Department of the Emergency Clinical County Hospital Cluj-Napoca, by retrospective analysis of the database containing 3013 records of the subjects presented for DDH assessment between January 2008 and December 2014. The study focuses on investigating two possible sources of missed cases by clinical-ultrasound management of DDH: borderline and asymmetric hips. Two conditions were studied in patients considered healthy according to Graf method: borderline hips (those with α angle value of 60° and 61°) and asymmetric hips (left to right difference between the α angle values exceeds 4°). Three study groups were formed: healthy subjects, asymmetric/borderline subjects and patients with immature or mild dysplasia. The incidence of risk factors, clinical suspicion and the success of therapy were evaluated.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the three groups regarding the role of the risk factors in DDH pathogenesis. Data reveal a high suspicion rate after the clinical examination, in groups II and III, compared to the healthy population. This means that from this point of view, Group II might be considered having at least a dysplastic prognosis. An increased correlation in the therapeutic results was observed between Group II patients and those from mild delayed maturation subgroups from Group III (IIa−, IIa+).ConclusionsAsymmetric and borderline hips should be approached similarly to immature hips, clinical suspicion and the therapeutic outcome being similar.