This study compared spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) estimates obtained from an identical set of data by 11 European centers using different methods and procedures. Noninvasive blood pressure (BP) and ECG recordings were obtained in 21 subjects, including 2 subjects with established baroreflex failure. Twenty-one estimates of BRS were obtained by methods including the two main techniques of BRS estimates, i.e., the spectral analysis (11 procedures) and the sequence method (7 procedures) but also one trigonometric regressive spectral analysis method (TRS), one exogenous model with autoregressive input method (X-AR), and one Z method. With subjects in a supine position, BRS estimates obtained with calculations of alpha-coefficient or gain of the transfer function in both the low-frequency band or high-frequency band, TRS, and sequence methods gave strongly related results. Conversely, weighted gain, X-AR, and Z exhibited lower agreement with all the other techniques. In addition, the use of mean BP instead of systolic BP in the sequence method decreased the relationships with the other estimates. Some procedures were unable to provide results when BRS estimates were expected to be very low in data sets (in patients with established baroreflex failure). The failure to provide BRS values was due to setting of algorithmic parameters too strictly. The discrepancies between procedures show that the choice of parameters and data handling should be considered before BRS estimation. These data are available on the web site (http://www.cbi.polimi.it/glossary/eurobavar.html) to allow the comparison of new techniques with this set of results.
Non-technical summary It is still unknown how the autonomic nervous system influences the fractal dynamics of cardiovascular signals. We show that in supine volunteers vagal and sympathetic outflows contribute differently to the fractal structures of heart rate and blood pressure. The vagal outflow contributes with a 'white-noise' component to the heart rate dynamics, indirectly influencing also the fractal dynamics of blood pressure. The sympathetic outflow contributes with a Brownian motion component to the heart rate dynamics, increasing long-term fractal coefficients, without affecting long-term coefficients of blood pressure. Results are explained by the different distribution and dynamics of acetylcholine receptors and of α-and β-adrenergic receptors. Our findings may allow better delineating alterations of cardiovascular fractal dynamics in physiological and pathophysiological settings.Abstract How the autonomic nervous system influences the fractal dynamics of heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) remains unclear. The purpose of our study was to separately assess cardiac vagal and sympathetic (cardiac vs. vascular) influences on fractal properties of HR and BP as described by scale exponents of detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA). R-R intervals, systolic and diastolic BP were measured in nine supine volunteers before and after administration of autonomic blocking agents (atropine, propranolol, atropine + propranolol, clonidine). Spectra of DFA scale exponents, α(t), were calculated for scales between 5 and 100 s. HR and BP scale structures differed at baseline, being α(t) of HR <1, with a minimum between 10 and 20 s followed by a higher plateau between 40 to 80 s, while α(t) of BP decreased with t from values >1. Comparison of atropine and propranolol with baseline and combined cardiac parasympathetic and sympathetic blockade (atropine + propranolol) indicated opposite influences of vagal and cardiac sympathetic outflows on HR exponents. The vagal outflow adds white-noise components, amplifying differences with BP exponents; the cardiac sympathetic outflow adds Brownian motion components at short scales and contributes to the plateau between 40 and 80 s. Overall sympathetic inhibition by clonidine decreased short-and long-term exponents of HR, and short-term exponents of BP, so that their α(t) spectra had different means but similar profiles. Therefore, cardiac vagal, cardiac sympathetic and vascular sympathetic outflows contribute differently to HR and BP fractal structures. Results are explained by different distribution and dynamics of acetylcholine receptors and of α-and β-adrenergic receptors between heart and vasculature. Abbreviations BP, blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DFA, detrended fluctuation analysis; HF, high frequency; HR, heart rate; LF, low frequency; MAP, mean arterial pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; VLF, very low frequency.
The pressor response to norepinephrine was reduced following lipopolysaccharide and increased to baseline levels following α-2 agonists.
It is unclear whether the complexity of the variability of the systolic arterial pressure (SAP) provides complementary information to that of the heart period (HP). The complexity of HP and SAP variabilities was assessed from short beat-to-beat recordings (i.e., 256 cardiac beats). The evaluation was made during a pharmacological protocol that induced vagal blockade with atropine or a sympathetic blockade (beta-adrenergic blockade with propranolol or central sympathetic blockade with clonidine) alone or in combination, during a graded head-up tilt, and in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) without orthostatic hypotension undergoing orthostatic challenge. Complexity was quantified according to the mean square prediction error (MSPE) derived from univariate autoregressive (AR) and multivariate AR (MAR) models. We found that: 1) MSPE(MAR) did not provide additional information to that of MSPE(AR); 2) SAP variability was less complex than that of HP; 3) because HP complexity was reduced by either vagal blockade or vagal withdrawal induced by head-up tilt and was unaffected by beta-adrenergic blockade, HP was under vagal control; 4) because SAP complexity was increased by central sympathetic blockade and was unmodified by either vagal blockade or vagal withdrawal induced by head-up tilt, SAP was under sympathetic control; 5) SAP complexity was increased in patients with PD; and 6) during orthostatic challenge, the complexity of both HP and SAP variabilities in patients with PD remained high, thus indicating both vagal and sympathetic impairments. Complexity indexes derived from short HP and SAP beat-to-beat series provide complementary information and are helpful in detecting early autonomic dysfunction in patients with PD well before circulatory symptoms become noticeable.
Extracellular recordings were made in the right nucleus ambiguus of urethane-anesthetized rats from 33 neurons that were activated at constant latency from the craniovagal cardiac branch. Their calculated conduction velocities were in the B-fiber range (1.6-13.8 m/s, median 4.2), and most (22/33) were silent. Active units were confirmed as cardiac vagal motoneurons (CVM) by the collision test for antidromic activation and by the presence of cardiac rhythmicity in their resting discharge (9/9). Brief arterial pressure rises of 20-50 mmHg increased the activity in five of five CVM by 0.1 +/- 0.02 spikes. s(-1). mmHg(-1) from a resting 3.8 +/- 1.2 spikes/s; they also recruited activity in two of four previously silent cardiac branch-projecting neurons. CVM firing was modulated by the central respiratory cycle, showing peak activity during inspiration (8/8). Rat CVM thus show firing properties similar to those in other species, but their respiratory pattern is distinct. These findings are discussed in relation to mechanisms of respiratory sinus arrhythmia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.