Estudo de caráter observacional, transversal, descritivo, com abordagem quantitativa, com o objetivo de avaliar as implicações bioéticas decorrentes da iniquidade socioeconômica em relação à distribuição de equipamentos de imagem na saúde pública brasileira. Foi encontrado resultado significante quando relacionado o número de equipamentos de diagnósticos por 100.000 habitantes e a porcentagem da população com renda inferior a meio salário-mínimo. Apenas dois estadosofereceram ótimas ofertas de equipamentos por imagem na rede do sistema público de saúde e baixos índices de extrema pobreza. Na perspectiva bioética, a má distribuição de equipamentos de diagnóstico por imagem pode ser vista como uma iniquidade gerada pela gestão pública.
O conhecimento do suprimento sanguíneo do seio maxilar, em particular da parede lateral, é de considerável importância devido à possibilidade de rompimento acidental de uma artéria durante os procedimento de elevação do assoalho do seio maxilar. Paciente do sexo feminino, 65 anos de idade, com histórico de complicação pós-operatória, após procedimento de elevação do seio maxilar realizado há três anos. Após avaliação tomográfica, foi observada a presença da artéria antral em posição atípica. Identificar e reconhecer essa estrutura anatômica pelo exame radiográfico pré-operatório, evita possíveis complicações hemorrágicas, durante e após o procedimento cirúrgico.Palavras-chave: Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico. Seio Maxilar. Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios.AbstractIt is very important the knowledge of the maxillary sinus blood supply, in particular of the lateral maxillary wall, due to the possibility of accidental rupture of a vessel during the sinus floor augmentation. A case report is described of a 65-year-old female, who reported a postoperative complication after a sinus augmentation that she had had 3 years before. After radiographic evaluation, it was observed the presence of antral artery in atypical position. The identification of this anatomical structure is very important, by preoperative radiographic examination, avoiding possible bleeding complications, during and after the surgical procedures.keywords: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Maxillary Sinus. Surgical Procedures, Operative.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence, location and clinical implications related to the presence of the retromolar canal (RMC) on cone beam computed tomography(CBCT). CBCT images of patients from Latin America Institute for Dental Research and Education - Curitiba,Pr,Brazil, was performed from June/2008 to February/2013. The interpretation was performed by a calibrated examiner, according to the criterias: presence, location and classification of the RMC variation, as well as, measurements of horizontal distances of the RMC in relation to the buccal bone cortical and diameter of these canals. A total of 751 CBCT images were interpreted: 486(64.7%) from females and 265 (35.3%) from male patients, with mean age of 54.57 (±13.23) years. The presence of RMC was observed in 58 (7.7%) patients, 23 men and 35 women. A total of 1502 hemi- mandibles were analyzed. The RMC was identified in 69(4.6%) hemi-mandibles, 44(63.8%) from females and 25(36.2%) from males. Thirty (42.8%) RMC were observed on the right side and 40 (57.2%) on the left one. The type B1 (n=33; 47.1%) was the most common, followed by the type A1 (n=18;25.7%). The mean diameter of RMC was 0.97mm (±0.44), and the mean distance between retromolar foramen and the buccal cortical of the mandible was 4.12mm (±1.35). There were no significant differences between the distances and genders, and distances and sides (p 0.05). The prevalence of RMC was 7.7% in the studied sample; they were predominantly unilateral and showed to be type B1.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.