Mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) metabolism plays a crucial role in the surrounding microenvironment in both normal physiology and pathological conditions. While MSCs predominantly utilize glycolysis in their native hypoxic niche within the bone marrow, new evidence reveals the importance of upregulation in mitochondrial activity in MSC function and differentiation. Mitochondria and mitochondrial regulators such as sirtuins play key roles in MSC homeostasis and differentiation into mature lineages of the bone and hematopoietic niche, including osteoblasts and adipocytes. The metabolic state of MSCs represents a fine balance between the intrinsic needs of the cellular state and constraints imposed by extrinsic conditions. In the context of injury and inflammation, MSCs respond to reactive oxygen species (ROS) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), such as damaged mitochondria and mitochondrial products, by donation of their mitochondria to injured cells. Through intercellular mitochondria trafficking, modulation of ROS, and modification of nutrient utilization, endogenous MSCs and MSC therapies are believed to exert protective effects by regulation of cellular metabolism in injured tissues. Similarly, these same mechanisms can be hijacked in malignancy whereby transfer of mitochondria and/or mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) to cancer cells increases mitochondrial content and enhances oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) to favor proliferation and invasion. The role of MSCs in tumor initiation, growth, and resistance to treatment is debated, but their ability to modify cancer cell metabolism and the metabolic environment suggests that MSCs are centrally poised to alter malignancy. In this review, we describe emerging evidence for adaptations in MSC bioenergetics that orchestrate developmental fate decisions and contribute to cancer progression. We discuss evidence and potential strategies for therapeutic targeting of MSC mitochondria in regenerative medicine and tissue repair. Lastly, we highlight recent progress in understanding the contribution of MSCs to metabolic reprogramming of malignancies and how these alterations can promote immunosuppression and chemoresistance. Better understanding the role of metabolic reprogramming by MSCs in tissue repair and cancer progression promises to broaden treatment options in regenerative medicine and clinical oncology.

Although the cancer stem cell (CSC) hypothesis has been around for many years, the reliability of cell-surface markers to classify CSCs has remained debatable. The finding that cancerous cells are significantly more deformable than healthy ones has provided motivation to consider mechanical properties as a possible biomarker for stemness. In this study, using the micropipette aspiration technique, mechanical properties of multiple breast cancer cell lines were investigated and correlated with breast cancer stem cell (BCSC) marker, CD44/CD24/ALDH1. The results indicated that Hs578T and MDA-MB-231 cell lines with CD44/CD24/ALDH1 phenotype were significantly more deformable than the MDA-MB-468 cell line, which did not express the BCSC marker. The BT-20 cell line with intermediate deformability did not express any CD44/CD24 phenotype, but it expressed aldehyde dehydrogenase-1 activity. In addition, more-deformable cell lines were found to roll with shear-independent velocities on E-selectin-coated substrates in a parallel-plate flow chamber, which might be a mediating factor for firm adhesion of CSCs to endothelium during metastasis. Our results indicate that rheological properties can be considered as a biomechanical marker in addition to, or as a complement of, surface markers to find more-definitive evidence of CSC characteristics within tumors.-Mohammadalipour, A., Burdick, M. M., Tees, D. F. J. Deformability of breast cancer cells in correlation with surface markers and cell rolling.

The only available option to treat radiation-induced hematopoietic syndrome is allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, a therapy unavailable to many patients undergoing treatment for malignancy, which would also be infeasible in a radiological disaster. Stromal cells serve as critical components of the hematopoietic stem cell niche and are thought to protect hematopoietic cells under stress. Prior studies that have transplanted mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) without co-administration of a hematopoietic graft have shown underwhelming rescue of endogenous hematopoiesis and have delivered the cells within 24 h of radiation exposure. Herein, we examine the efficacy of a human bone marrow-derived MSC therapy delivered at 3 h or 30 h in ameliorating radiation-induced hematopoietic syndrome and show that pancytopenia persists despite MSC therapy. Animals exposed to radiation had poorer survival and experienced loss of leukocytes, platelets, and red blood cells. Importantly, mice that received a therapeutic dose of MSCs were significantly less likely to die but experienced equivalent collapse of the hematopoietic system. The cause of the improved survival was unclear, as complete blood counts, splenic and marrow cellularity, numbers and function of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, and frequency of niche cells were not significantly improved by MSC therapy. Moreover, human MSCs were not detected in the bone marrow. MSC therapy reduced crypt dropout in the small intestine and promoted elevated expression of growth factors with established roles in gut development and regeneration, including PDGF-A, IGFBP-3, IGFBP-2, and IGF-1. We conclude that MSC therapy improves survival not through overt hematopoietic rescue but by positive impact on other radiosensitive tissues, such as the intestinal mucosa. Collectively, these data reveal that MSCs could be an effective countermeasure in cancer patients and victims of nuclear accidents but that MSCs alone do not significantly accelerate or contribute to recovery of the blood system.

Introduction-Invasion of other tissues during bloodborne metastasis in part requires adhesion of cancer cells to vascular endothelium by specific fluid shear-dependent receptor-ligand interactions. This study investigates the hypothesis that the adhesion is mediated by ligands shared between endothelial E-selectin and Galectin-1 (Gal-1), both of which are upregulated during inflammation and cancer. Methods-Flow chamber adhesion and dynamic biochemical tissue analysis (DBTA) assays were used to evaluate whether Gal-1 modulates E-selectin adhesive interactions of breast cancer cells and tissues under dynamic flow conditions, while immunocytochemistry, immunohistochemistry, western blotting, and fluorescence anisotropy were used to study molecular interactions under static conditions. Results-Dynamic adhesion assays revealed a shear-dependent binding interaction between Gal-1hFc treated breast cancer cells and tissues and E-selectin-coated beads, caus-ing~300% binding increase of the beads compared to negative controls. Immunocyto-and immunohistochemical analyses showed that Gal-1 and E-selectin fluorescent signals colocalized on cells and tissues at~75% for each assay. Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting of Mac-2BP from breast cancer cell lysates revealed that Gal-1 and Eselectin share Mac-2BP as a ligand, while fluorescence anisotropy and circulating tumor cell model systems exhibited competitive or antagonistic binding between Gal-1 and E-selectin for shared ligands, including Mac-2BP. Furthermore, Mac-2BP functional blockade inhibited the effects of Gal-1 on E-selectin binding. Conclusions-In summary, this investigation reveals a sheardependent interaction between E-selectin and Gal-1 that may be due to intermediation by a similar or shared ligand(s), including Mac-2BP, which may provide a rational basis for development of novel diagnostics or therapeutics for breast cancer.

Lymphatic drainage generates force that induces prostate cancer cell motility via activation of Yes‐associated protein (YAP), but whether this response to fluid force is conserved across cancer types is unclear. Here, we show that shear stress corresponding to fluid flow in the initial lymphatics modifies taxis in breast cancer, whereas some cell lines use rapid amoeboid migration behavior in response to fluid flow, a separate subset decrease movement. Positive responders displayed transcriptional profiles characteristic of an amoeboid cell state, which is typical of cells advancing at the edges of neoplastic tumors. Regulation of the HIPPO tumor suppressor pathway and YAP activity also differed between breast subsets and prostate cancer. Although subcellular localization of YAP to the nucleus positively correlated with overall velocity of locomotion, YAP gain‐ and loss‐of‐function demonstrates that YAP inhibits breast cancer motility but is outcompeted by other pro‐taxis mediators in the context of flow. Specifically, we show that RhoA dictates response to flow. GTPase activity of RhoA, but not Rac1 or Cdc42 Rho family GTPases, is elevated in cells that positively respond to flow and is unchanged in cells that decelerate under flow. Disruption of RhoA or the RhoA effector, Rho‐associated kinase (ROCK), blocked shear stress–induced motility. Collectively, these findings identify biomechanical force as a regulator amoeboid cell migration and demonstrate stratification of breast cancer subsets by flow‐sensing mechanotransduction pathways.