Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease primarily affecting motor function, with additional evidence of extensive nonmotor involvement. Despite increasing recognition of the disease as a multisystem network disorder characterised by impaired connectivity, the precise neuroelectric characteristics of impaired cortical communication remain to be fully elucidated. Here, we characterise changes in functional connectivity using beamformer source analysis on resting‐state electroencephalography recordings from 74 ALS patients and 47 age‐matched healthy controls. Spatiospectral characteristics of network changes in the ALS patient group were quantified by spectral power, amplitude envelope correlation (co‐modulation) and imaginary coherence (synchrony). We show patterns of decreased spectral power in the occipital and temporal (δ‐ to β‐band), lateral/orbitofrontal (δ‐ to θ‐band) and sensorimotor (β‐band) regions of the brain in patients with ALS. Furthermore, we show increased co‐modulation of neural oscillations in the central and posterior (δ‐, θ‐ and γl‐band) and frontal (δ‐ and γl‐band) regions, as well as decreased synchrony in the temporal and frontal (δ‐ to β‐band) and sensorimotor (β‐band) regions. Factorisation of these complex connectivity patterns reveals a distinct disruption of both motor and nonmotor networks. The observed changes in connectivity correlated with structural MRI changes, functional motor scores and cognitive scores. Characteristic patterned changes of cortical function in ALS signify widespread disease‐associated network disruption, pointing to extensive dysfunction of both motor and cognitive networks. These statistically robust findings, that correlate with clinical scores, provide a strong rationale for further development as biomarkers of network disruption for future clinical trials.

No abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a devastating disease characterised primarily by motor system degeneration, with clinical evidence of cognitive and behavioural change in up to 50% of cases. ALS is both clinically and biologically heterogeneous. Subgrouping is currently undertaken using clinical parameters, such as site of symptom onset (bulbar or spinal), burden of disease (based on the modified El Escorial Research Criteria) and genomics in those with familial disease. However, with the exception of genomics, these subcategories do not take into account underlying disease pathobiology, and are not fully predictive of disease course or prognosis. Recently, we have shown that resting-state EEG can reliably and quantitatively capture abnormal patterns of motor and cognitive network disruption in ALS. These network disruptions have been identified across multiple frequency bands, and using measures of neural activity (spectral power) and connectivity (co-modulation of activity by amplitude envelope correlation and synchrony by imaginary coherence) on source-localised brain oscillations from high-density EEG. Using data-driven methods (similarity network fusion and spectral clustering), we have now undertaken a clustering analysis to identify disease subphenotypes and to determine whether different patterns of disruption are predictive of disease outcome. We show that ALS patients (N = 95) can be subgrouped into four phenotypes with distinct neurophysiological profiles. These clusters are characterised by varying degrees of disruption in the somatomotor (α-band synchrony), frontotemporal (β-band neural activity and γl-band synchrony) and frontoparietal (γl-band co-modulation) networks, which reliably correlate with distinct clinical profiles and different disease trajectories. Using an in-depth stability analysis, we show that these clusters are statistically reproducible and robust, remain stable after re-assessment using a follow-up EEG session, and continue to predict the clinical trajectory and disease outcome. Our data demonstrate that novel phenotyping using neuroelectric signal analysis can distinguish disease subtypes based exclusively on different patterns of network disturbances. These patterns may reflect underlying disease neurobiology. The identification of ALS subtypes based on profiles of differential impairment in neuronal networks has clear potential in future stratification for clinical trials. Advanced network profiling in ALS can also underpin new therapeutic strategies that are based on principles of neurobiology and designed to modulate network disruption.

ObjectiveTo localise and characterise changes in cognitive networks in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) using source analysis of mismatch negativity (MMN) waveforms.RationaleThe MMN waveform has an increased average delay in ALS. MMN has been attributed to change detection and involuntary attention switching. This therefore indicates pathological impairment of the neural network components which generate these functions. Source localisation can mitigate the poor spatial resolution of sensor-level EEG analysis by associating the sensor-level signals to the contributing brain sources. The functional activity in each generating source can therefore be individually measured and investigated as a quantitative biomarker of impairment in ALS or its sub-phenotypes.MethodsMMN responses from 128-channel electroencephalography (EEG) recordings in 58 ALS patients and 39 healthy controls were localised to source by three separate localisation methods, including beamforming, dipole fitting and exact low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography.ResultsCompared with controls, ALS patients showed significant increase in power of the left posterior parietal, central and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices (false discovery rate = 0.1). This change correlated with impaired cognitive flexibility (rho = 0.45, 0.45, 0.47, p = .042, .055, .031 respectively). ALS patients also exhibited a decrease in the power of dipoles representing activity in the inferior frontal (left: p = 5.16 × 10−6, right: p = 1.07 × 10−5) and left superior temporal gyri (p = 9.30 × 10−6). These patterns were detected across three source localisation methods. Decrease in right inferior frontal gyrus activity was a good discriminator of ALS patients from controls (AUROC = 0.77) and an excellent discriminator of C9ORF72 expansion-positive patients from controls (AUROC = 0.95).InterpretationSource localization of evoked potentials can reliably discriminate patterns of functional network impairment in ALS and ALS subgroups during involuntary attention switching. The discriminative ability of the detected cognitive changes in specific brain regions are comparable to those of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).Source analysis of high-density EEG patterns has excellent potential to provide non-invasive, data-driven quantitative biomarkers of network disruption that could be harnessed as novel neurophysiology-based outcome measures in clinical trials.