Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are a family of particles/vesicles present in blood and body fluids, composed of phospholipid bilayers that carry a variety of molecules that can mediate cell communication, modulating crucial cell processes such as homeostasis, induction/dampening of inflammation, and promotion of repair. Their existence, initially suspected in 1946 and confirmed in 1967, spurred a sharp increase in the number of scientific publications. Paradoxically, the increasing interest for EV content and function progressively reduced the relevance for a precise nomenclature in classifying EVs, therefore leading to a confusing scientific production. The aim of this review was to analyze the evolution of the progress in the knowledge and definition of EVs over the years, with an overview of the methodologies used for the identification of the vesicles, their cell of origin, and the detection of their cargo. The MISEV 2018 guidelines for the proper recognition nomenclature and ways to study EVs are summarized. The review finishes with a “more questions than answers” chapter, in which some of the problems we still face to fully understand the EV function and potential as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool are analyzed.

The impact that COVID-19 could have on patients with COPD is a real concern. In this study we evaluated, in a cohort of longitudinally followed COPD subjects, the incidence of COVID-19, seeking for possible risk factors and prognostic factors predicting the clinical outcome. In our cohort of 370 patients (followed for 5.3 ± 2.7 years), 22 developed COVID-19 (COPD/COVID-19+) between February/November 2020 (5.9%). Cardio-metabolic conditions (hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, diabetes) but not respiratory abnormalities (FEV1, DLCO, emphysema and exacerbation history), were risk factors for development of COVID-19 in COPD patients. Out of the 22 COPD/COVID-19+ patients, 10 needed intensive care. Low DLCO and emphysema, but also metabolic comorbidities, were related to the need for intensive care.

Background. Microvesicles (MVs) released from almost all cells are recognized as cell communication tools. MVs have been investigated in several inflammatory diseases but poorly in biological fluids like bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of smokers. Aims. The purpose of this study was to investigate the presence and source of MVs in BAL of smokers with and without COPD compared to non-smoking controls. Methods and Results. Using flow-cytometry in BAL we detected endothelial and Alveolar Macrophage (AM)-derived MVs, and found a higher number of AM-MVs in the BAL of smokers with COPD than in smokers without COPD and non-smokers, which correlated with the pack-years (r=0.46; p=0.05) and with the degree of airway obstruction measured by the FEV1 % predicted (r= -0.56; p=0.01). Conclusion. Endothelial and Alveolar Macrophages-derived MVs are present and measurable in human BAL fluid. In response to smoking and to the development of COPD, inflammatory signals in AM-derived MVs can be quantified, and their numbers are related to the pack-years and the decrease in lung function. These results open the opportunity for future investigation of these microvesicles as biomarkers and possible mechanistic guides in COPD.

BackgroundChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a major health problem, mainly due to cigarette smoking. Most studies in COPD are dedicated to fully developed COPD in older subjects, even though development of COPD may start soon after smoking initiation. Therefore, there is a need to diagnose this “early disease” by detecting the initial events responsible for ultimate development of COPD.MethodsMeasurement of maximum mid expiratory flow between 25–75 of vital capacity (MMEF) in a routine spirometry, that detects small airways disease, was used to investigate if MMEF abnormalities in smokers without COPD (noCOPD) would relate to respiratory symptoms and identify smokers that might progress to COPD. For this purpose we studied 511 smokers, 302 COPD and 209 noCOPD, followed long term with spirometry including MMEF, CO diffusion capacity (DLCO), 6-minute walking test (6MWT), MRC Dyspnoea Scale, and COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Three spirometries V1,V2,V3 (5±2.5 and 10±4 years apart respectively from V1) were performed to assess functional decline and development of COPD.Results65% of noCOPD had an abnormal MMEF (<80%) and 38% an abnormal DLCO. NoCOPD with MMEF<80% performed worse in the 6MWT (p=0.01), were more dyspnoeic (p=0.01) and had higher prevalence of chronic bronchitis than noCOPD with MMEF>80% (p=0.04). 21% of noCOPD with MMEF<80%, and 2.7% with MMEF>80% developed COPD by V3 (p=0.0004).ConclusionsThe MMEF, a functional test available in a routine spirometry, can detect early lung abnormalities and identify the subset of symptomatic smokers with pathologic changes that might lead to COPD.

Background: Some 20% of patients with stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) might have heart failure (HF). HF contribution to acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) presenting to the emergency department (ED) is not well established. Aims: To assess (1) the HF incidence in patients presenting to the ED with AECOPD; (2) the concordance between ED and respiratory ward (RW) diagnosis; (3) the factors associated with risk of death after hospital discharge. Methods: Retrospective chart review of 119 COPD patients presenting to ED for acute exacerbation of respiratory symptoms and then admitted to RW where a final diagnosis of AECOPD, AECOPD and HF and AECOPD and OD (other diagnosis), was obtained. ED and RW diagnosis were then compared. Factors affecting survival at follow-up were investigated. Results: At RW, 40.3% of cases were diagnosed of AECOPD, 40.3% of AECOPD and HF and 19.4% of AECOPD and OD, with ED diagnosis coinciding with RW’s in 67%, 23%, and 57% of cases respectively. At RW, 60% of patients in GOLD1 had HF, of which 43% were diagnosed at ED, while 40% in GOLD4 had HF that was never diagnosed at ED. Lack of inclusion in a COPD care program, HF, and early readmission for AECOPD were associated with mortality. Conclusions: HF is highly prevalent and difficult to diagnose in patients in all GOLD stages presenting to the ED with severe AECOPD, and along with lack of inclusion in a COPD care program, confers a high risk for mortality.