Sharif, Hatim O., Almoutaz A. Hassan, Sazzad Bin‐Shafique, Hongjie Xie, and Jon Zeitler, 2010. Hydrologic Modeling of an Extreme Flood in the Guadalupe River in Texas. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 1‐11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752‐1688.2010.00459.x Abstract:  Many of the storms creating the greatest rainfall depths in Texas, measured over durations ranging from one minute to 48 hours, have occurred in the Texas Hill Country area. The upstream portion of the Guadalupe River Basin, located in the Texas Hill Country, is susceptible to flooding and rapid runoff due to thin soils, exposed bedrock, and sparse vegetation, in addition to the Balcones Escarpment uplift contributing to precipitation enhancement. In November 2004, a moist air mass from the Gulf of Mexico combined with moist air from the Pacific Ocean resulted in the wettest November in Texas since 1895. Although the peak discharges were not the highest on record, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) stream gauge on the Guadalupe River at Gonzales, Texas reported a daily mean discharge of 2,304 m3/s on November 23, 2004 (average discharge is 53 m3/s). In this paper, we examine the meteorological conditions that led to this event and apply a two‐dimensional, physically based, distributed‐parameter hydrologic model to simulate the response of a portion of the basin during this event. The study results clearly demonstrate the ability of physically based, distributed‐parameter simulations, driven by operational radar rainfall products, to adequately model the cumulative effect of two rainfall events and route inflows from three upstream watersheds without the need for significant calibration.

No abstract

The need for accurate hydrologic analysis and rainfall–runoff modelling tools has been rapidly increasing because of the growing complexity of operational hydrologic and hydraulic problems associated with population growth, rapid urbanization and expansion of agricultural activities. Given the recent advances in remote sensing of physiographic features and the availability of near real‐time precipitation products, rainfall–runoff models are expected to predict runoff more accurately. In this study, we compare the performance and implementation requirements of two rainfall–runoff models for a semi‐urbanized watershed. One is a semi‐distributed conceptual model, the Hydrologic Engineering Center‐Hydrologic Modelling System (HEC‐HMS). The other is a physically based, distributed‐parameter hydrologic model, the Gridded Surface Subsurface Hydrologic Analysis (GSSHA). Four flood events that took place on the Leon Creek watershed, a sub‐watershed of the San Antonio River basin in Texas, were used in this study. The two models were driven by the Multisensor Precipitation Estimator radar products. One event (in 2007) was used for HEC‐HMS and GSSHA calibrations. Two events (in 2004 and 2007) were used for further calibration of HEC‐HMS. Three events (in 2002, 2004 and 2010) were used for model validation. In general, the physically based, distributed‐parameter model performed better than the conceptual model and required less calibration. The two models were prepared with the same minimum required input data, and the effort required to build the two models did not differ substantially. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Satellite snow cover area (SCA) mapping using optical sensors has been known to suffer severe obstruction due to vegetation canopy and cloud cover. Several algorithms have been developed to reduce cloud cover contamination and enhance the SCA mapping. In this study we introduce the use of a daily SCA product from the Multisensor Snow and Ice Mapping System (IMS) at a nominal resolution of 4 km, assess its accuracy and error levels against in situ observations, and compare the IMS SCA product with the SCA products from moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS), a combination of daily Terra and Aqua satellites. The results show that the snow accuracies are higher during winter for both IMS and MODIS, and that there is not much difference between MODIS at 500 m and upscaled at 4 km. The IMS SCA mapping accuracies are significantly higher than MODIS accuracies for all sky conditions, while they are similar to or slightly lower than MODIS accuracies in clear sky conditions. The overestimate error of snow cover using IMS is higher (lower) than that of MODIS during ablation (accumulation) periods. Both MODIS and IMS show a similar pattern of underestimation errors of snow cover with the IMS being slightly higher than the MODIS. It is concluded that the IMS SCA product has potential as a good alternative for the MODIS daily SCA products or replacing those cloud pixels in the MODIS daily or multiday products.