Objective
The primary objective of this project was to retrospectively investigate the relationship between patient‐reported and physiologic swallowing measures after chemoradiation therapy for head neck cancer (HNC).
Methods
Adult patients who underwent chemoradiation therapy for HNC and presented for videofluoroscopic swallow study were reviewed retrospectively. Surgically treated patients were excluded. Patient perception of swallowing‐related outcomes was assessed via the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) on the same day that physiologic measures of swallow function were obtained. Using vidoefluoroscopic data, the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) scale yielded measures of safety (DIGEST‐S: penetration/aspiration) and efficiency (DIGEST‐E: residue). Statistical analysis for correlation coefficients was performed.
Results
Thirty patients met the inclusion criteria. The oropharynx was the most commonly affected site (70.0%), followed by the larynx (16.7%). The median radiation dose was 72 grays (Gy), and participants were assessed a mean of 4.6 (range 0–12) years following completion of treatment. There was no correlation between the MDADI and the DIGEST‐E score (Pearson rho = −0.045, P = 0.812), DIGEST‐S score (Pearson rho = 0.075, P = 0.695), or summary DIGEST grade (Pearson rho = 0.046, P = 0.810). MDADI scores did not change significantly with increasing time since radiation (P = 0.375), whereas the DIGEST‐E scores, DIGEST‐S score, and summary DIGEST grades worsened over time (P = 0.007, P = 0.002, and P = 0.0005, respectively).
Conclusion
Assessment of swallowing physiology showed that function worsened after chemoradiation therapy, but this did not correlate with patient‐reported quality‐of‐life measures. Reduced patient awareness of swallow dysfunction years after completion of chemoradiation has implications for management of dysphagia in the face of physiologic decline.
Level of Evidence
4
Laryngoscope, 129:2059–2064, 2019
Pharyngoesophageal stricture after IMRT and chemotherapy treatment for head and neck cancer is not uncommon. Videofluoroscopic swallow study should be performed prospectively to evaluate swallowing function.
Objective (1) To identify factors associated with severe dysfunctional larynx leading to total laryngectomy after curative treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and (2) to describe swallowing and voice outcomes. Study Design Retrospective single-institution case-control study. Setting Tertiary care referral center. Methods A 10-year chart review was performed for patients who had previously undergone radiation or chemoradiation for head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinoma and planned to undergo total laryngectomy for dysfunctional larynx, as well as a control group of matched patients. Controls were patients who had undergone radiation or chemoradiation for mucosal squamous cell carcinoma but did not have severe dysfunction warranting laryngectomy; these were matched to cases by tumor subsite, T stage, and time from last treatment to video swallow study. Main outcomes assessed were postoperative diet, alaryngeal voice, pharyngeal dilations, and complications. Results Twenty-six patients were scheduled for laryngectomy for dysfunctional larynx, of which 23 underwent surgery. Originally treated tumor subsites included the larynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, oral cavity, and a tumor of unknown origin. The median time from end of cancer treatment to laryngectomy was 11.5 years. All cases were feeding tube or tracheostomy dependent or both prior to laryngectomy. As compared with matched controls, cases were significantly less likely to have undergone IMRT (intensity-modified radiotherapy) and more likely to have pulmonary comorbidities. Eighty-nine percent of cases with follow-up achieved functional alaryngeal voice, and all were able to have oral intake. Conclusion Non-IMRT approaches and pulmonary comorbidities are associated with laryngectomy for dysfunction after radiation or chemoradiation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.