Furian and colleagues report on the results of two randomized controlled trials testing the use of acetazolamide to prevent the adverse effects of altitude on healthy older persons and in people with COPD. They find that acetazolamide decreased the incidence of altitude related adverse health events (primarily hypoxemia) in both populations with no evidence of adverse events.

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may be susceptible to impairments in postural control (PC) when exposed to hypoxia at high altitude. This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-design trial evaluated the effect of preventive acetazolamide treatment on PC in lowlanders with COPD traveling to 3100 m. 127 lowlanders (85 men, 42 women) with moderate to severe COPD, aged 57 ± 8 y, living below 800 m, were randomized to treatment with acetazolamide 375 mg/d starting 24 h before ascent from 760 m to 3100 m and during a 2-day sojourn in a clinic at 3100 m. PC was evaluated at both altitudes with a balance platform on which patients were standing during five tests of 30 s each. The primary outcome was the center of pressure path length (COPL). In the placebo group, COPL significantly increased from (mean ± SD) 28.8 ± 9.7 cm at 760 m to 30.0 ± 10.0 cm at 3100 m (p = 0.002). In the acetazolamide group, COPL at 760 m and 3100 m were similar with 27.6 ± 9.6 cm and 28.4 ± 9.7 cm (p = 0.069). The mean between-groups difference (acetazolamide-placebo) in altitude-induced change of COPL was −0.54 cm (95%CI −1.66 to 0.58, p = 0.289). Multivariable regression analysis confirmed an increase in COPL of 0.98 cm (0.39 to 1.58, p = 0.001) with ascent from 760 to 3100 m, but no significant effect of acetazolamide (0.66 cm, 95%CI −0.25 to 1.57, p = 0.156) when adjusting for several confounders. In lowlanders with moderate to severe COPD, an ascent to high altitude was associated with impaired postural control and this was not prevented by acetazolamide.

Introduction: We evaluated whether exposure to high altitude impairs visuomotor learning in lowlanders with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and whether this can be prevented by acetazolamide treatment.Methods: 45 patients with COPD, living <800 m, FEV1 ≥40 to <80%predicted, were randomized to acetazolamide (375 mg/d) or placebo, administered 24h before and during a 2-day stay in a clinic at 3100 m. Visuomotor performance was evaluated with a validated, computer-assisted test (Motor-Task-Manager) at 760 m above sea level (baseline, before starting the study drug), within 4h after arrival at 3100 m and in the morning after one night at 3100 m. Main outcome was the directional error (DE) of cursor movements controlled by the participant via mouse on a computer screen during a target tracking task. Effects of high altitude and acetazolamide on DE during an adaptation phase, immediate recall and post-sleep recall were evaluated by regression analyses. www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03165890.Results: In 22 patients receiving placebo, DE at 3100 m increased during adaptation by mean 2.5°, 95%CI 2.2° to 2.7° (p < 0.001), during immediate recall by 5.3°, 4.6° to 6.1° (p < 0.001), and post-sleep recall by 5.8°, 5.0 to 6.7° (p < 0.001), vs. corresponding values at 760 m. In 23 participants receiving acetazolamide, corresponding DE were reduced by −0.3° (−0.6° to 0.1°, p = 0.120), −2.7° (−3.7° to −1.6°, p < 0.001) and −3.1° (−4.3° to −2.0°, p < 0.001), compared to placebo at 3100 m.Conclusion: Lowlanders with COPD travelling to 3100 m experienced altitude-induced impairments in immediate and post-sleep recall of a visuomotor task. Preventive acetazolamide treatment mitigated these undesirable effects.

BackgroundNovel, portable blood gas analyzers (BGAs) may serve as essential point-of-care tools in remote regions, during air travel or in ambulance services but they have not been extensively validated.Research QuestionWe compared accuracy of a portable BGA to a validated stationary device.MethodsIn healthy individuals and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease participating in clinical field studies at different altitudes, arterial blood samples were obtained at rest and during exercise in a hospital at 760 m and in a high altitude clinic at 3100 m. Paired measurements by a portable BGA (EPOC, Siemens Healthcare) and a stationary BGA (Rapidpoint500, Siemens Healthcare) were performed to compute bias (mean difference) and limits of agreement (95% CI of bias).ResultsOf 105 individuals, 248 arterial blood samples were analyzed, 108 at 760 m, 140 at 3100 m. Ranges of values measured by portable BGA were: pH 7.241−7.473, PaCO2 21.5−52.5 mmHg, and PaO2 45.5−107.1 mmHg. Bias (95% CI) between devices were: pH 0.007 (−0.029 to 0.044), PaCO2 −0.3 mmHg (−4.8 to 4.2), and PaO2 −0.2 mmHg (−9.1 to 4.7). For pH, agreement between devices was improved by the equation to correct pH by portable BGA = −1.37 + pHmeasured × 1.19; bias after correction −0.007 (−0.023 to 0.009). The portable BGA was easily handled and worked reliably.InterpretationAccuracy of blood gas analysis by the portable BGA in comparison to the reference BGA was adequate for clinical use. Because of portability and ease of handling, portable BGA are valuable diagnostic tools for use in everyday practice as well as under challenging field conditions.

No abstract