Optimization of pacemaker settings for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains challenging and problematic. Several noninvasive methods are offered to customize the programmed parameters for individual patients, but so far only echocardiographic imaging has established itself as an accepted method. The authors examined the value of acoustic cardiography as a fast and more cost‐efficient alternative to established echocardiographic imaging techniques for the optimization of CRT devices. The atrioventricular delay in 22 subjects with implanted CRT devices was independently optimized using echocardiography (Doppler transmitral flow) as well as acoustic cardiography, and the recommended settings from each method were later compared. Doppler echocardiography and acoustic cardiography recommendations matched within a mean value ± SD of 17±16 milliseconds and gave a correlation coefficient of r=0.90 (p<0.001). In 17 of the 22 cases (77.3%), the difference between echocardiographic and acoustic cardiogram CRT optimization results was ≤20 milliseconds. Furthermore, the echocardiographic transmitral flow pattern was not significantly different for the setting independently chosen by the echocardiographic expert and the acoustic cardiographer for the cases with a difference of >20 milliseconds (22.7%). In addition, it took less time for the acoustic cardiogram to collect sufficient information to make a recommendation, and it was found that the acoustic cardiogram data trend is easier to interpret.
Optimization of pacemaker settings for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains challenging and problematic. Several noninvasive methods are offered to customize the programmed parameters for individual patients, but so far only echocardiographic imaging has established itself as an accepted method. The authors examined the value of acoustic cardiography as a fast and more cost-efficient alternative to established echocardiographic imaging techniques for the optimization of CRT devices. The atrioventricular delay in 22 subjects with implanted CRT devices was independently optimized using echocardiography (Doppler transmitral flow) as well as acoustic cardiography, and the recommended settings from each method were later compared. Doppler echocardiography and acoustic cardiography recommendations matched within a mean value +/- SD of 17+/-16 milliseconds and gave a correlation coefficient of r=0.90 (p<0.001). In 17 of the 22 cases (77.3%), the difference between echocardiographic and acoustic cardiogram CRT optimization results was 20 milliseconds (22.7%). In addition, it took less time for the acoustic cardiogram to collect sufficient information to make a recommendation, and it was found that the acoustic cardiogram data trend is easier to interpret.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.